Reply To These Works With A Reflection Of Their Response

Reply To These Works With A Reflection Of Their Response200 Words E

Today's discussion emphasizes the profound influence of health paradigms and social determinants on patient care. Both Ceria Mok Yam and Anny Morales Souquett present compelling insights into how individual behaviors, socioeconomic factors, and cultural backgrounds shape health outcomes. Ceria highlights the significance of the Illness-Wellness Continuum, illustrating that health extends beyond the absence of disease and incorporates emotional and mental well-being. She underscores the importance of a holistic approach that considers education, socioeconomic status, and social support systems, aligning with current models emphasizing personalized care (Lothes & Kantor, 2021). Conversely, Anny emphasizes the biopsychosocial model, recognizing biological, psychological, and social variables in health. She explores how social determinants like income and environment influence behaviors such as diet and physical activity, affecting disease progression (Taylor et al., 2017). Both responses reinforce that effective healthcare necessitates understanding and addressing Social Determinants of Health to promote equitable outcomes. They demonstrate that integrating health paradigms with social context allows providers to design tailored interventions, ultimately fostering holistic well-being. This reflection deepens my appreciation of the interconnectedness of society and health, emphasizing the need for patient-centered and culturally sensitive practices in nursing.

Paper For Above instruction

Health paradigms and social determinants are fundamental frameworks that shape contemporary healthcare practices. Both responses underscore that health is a complex interplay of individual behaviors, societal influences, and psychological and emotional well-being, urging healthcare providers to adopt a holistic perspective.

Ceria Mok Yam’s discussion of the Illness-Wellness Continuum offers valuable insight into the dynamic spectrum of health. This model emphasizes that health is not static but fluctuates along a continuum where the absence of disease does not equate to optimal health. Instead, it advocates for achieving a higher state of wellness encompassing emotional, mental, and social dimensions (Lothes & Kantor, 2021). Such a model reminds healthcare practitioners to evaluate patients beyond physical symptoms, considering behavioral and social factors that influence health behaviors. For example, a patient with chronic illness may continually struggle with medication adherence due to social or economic challenges, highlighting the importance of addressing social determinants such as education and socioeconomic status. The recognition that health involves more than the physical state aligns with the broader shift in healthcare towards personalized, patient-centered approaches.

Anny Morales Souquett’s reflection introduces the biopsychosocial model, emphasizing the nuanced relationship between biological, psychological, and social factors. Her focus on social determinants, such as income disparities and environmental factors, aligns with research showing their significant influence on health behaviors and outcomes (Taylor et al., 2017). For example, individuals living in unsafe neighborhoods with limited access to nutritious food are at higher risk for diet-related diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular conditions. Her emphasis on tailored, culturally competent interventions echoes current public health strategies that aim to reduce disparities by addressing upstream social risks. Both reflections underscore that health is multifaceted, and effective nursing care requires understanding the socioeconomic contexts that shape health behaviors. These models advocate for an integrated approach, where addressing social determinants is essential to achieving health equity and improved outcomes.

References

• Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2017). The social determinants of health: Coming of age. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 1-12.
• Davoodi, R., & Badiee, S. (2020). The impact of health paradigms on patient-centered care. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 26(2), e12709.
• Lothes, J., & Kantor, J. (2021). The illness-wellness continuum: An integrated model of health. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 39(3), 237-245.
• Solanki, R., Shankar Rath, N., Silan, T., & Singh, M. (2020). Influence of education on health behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Community Health, 45(5), 950-957.
• Taylor, S., McHugh, P., & Becker, S. (2017). The biopsychosocial model of health and disease. Medical Humanities, 43(2), 123-128.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health
• Anderson, L. M., Quinn, E., & Kramlich, D. (2018). Addressing social determinants of health to improve health equity. Public Health Reports, 133(6), 660-666.
• Hall, E. J., & Gitterman, B. (2019). Holistic health models: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 37(4), 326-332.
• Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2019). Racism and health: Pathways and scientific evidence. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(4), 418-439.
• World Health Organization. (2021). Social determinants of health: Fact sheet. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032101