Report Assessment Rubric For Literature Review Criteria ✓ Solved

Report Assessment Rubric Literature Reviewcriteriahigh

Assess the criteria for a high distinction in a literature review report, including understanding, use of evidence, structure and style, technical skills, and referencing.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In conducting a literature review with high distinction standards, it is imperative to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, engaging in a sophisticated interpretation of the existing scholarly work. Such a review should not only summarize relevant literature but critically analyze and synthesize findings across multiple sources, revealing insights that contribute to a deeper understanding of the research topic. For example, a high distinction literature review on organizational change might explore various theoretical frameworks, critically evaluating their applicability and limitations while integrating empirical studies that showcase the effectiveness or challenges of implementing change initiatives.

The use of evidence is a cornerstone of a high-quality literature review. An exemplary review integrates a broad range of reputable scholarly sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and authoritative reports. These sources should be seamlessly woven into the narrative to support the critical analysis rather than merely cited in passing. For instance, referencing key empirical studies alongside seminal theoretical papers demonstrates a well-rounded understanding and supports a nuanced discussion. The integration should serve to emphasize relationships, contradictions, and gaps within the literature, offering a compelling argument or perspective.

The structure and style of the literature review must be logically organized, beginning with an engaging introduction that clearly states the scope and purpose. The body should be divided into thematically or chronologically organized sections, each logically flowing into the next, culminating in a comprehensive conclusion that synthesizes the key insights and implications for practice or further research. Writing style should be sophisticated, employing clear, concise, and precise language. Sentence structures must vary to maintain reader engagement, and the tone should reflect academic rigor. Coherence and fluidity in presentation are essential, with each paragraph serving a distinct purpose within the overall argument.

Technical skills are demonstrated through accurate and varied sentence structures, minimal grammatical and punctuation errors, and the appropriate use of discipline-specific terminology. An exceptional literature review employs complex sentence constructions that enhance clarity and emphasis, using discipline-specific vocabulary correctly. Consistency and accuracy in spelling, grammar, and punctuation are critical, as errors can detract from the credibility and readability of the review. Attention to detail in language reflects a high level of academic writing proficiency.

Proper referencing in APA style is fundamental. All cited sources should be correctly formatted, with in-text citations matching the reference list entries. An accurate and comprehensive reference list not only acknowledges intellectual property but also allows readers to locate sources for further investigation. Attention should be paid to details such as author names, publication years, titles, and source details. Even minor errors in referencing can undermine the credibility of the work and may lead to penalization in assessment settings.

In summary, a high distinction literature review exemplifies critical thinking, comprehensive integration of evidence, impeccable organization and language, and scrupulous adherence to academic conventions. These standards reflect not only an advanced understanding of the literature but also scholarly excellence in communicating that understanding effectively.

References

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Routledge.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. SAGE Publications.
• Pourhoseingholi, M. A., Vahedi, M., & Rahimzadeh, M. (2013). How to control confounding effect. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 6(3), 69–74.
• Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. SAGE Publications.
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
• Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2016). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. SAGE Publications.
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.