Research Article Identification: Read Each Of The Abstracts
Research Article Identificationread Each Of The Abstracts For The Arti
Identify the study by title and authors.
Determine what question(s) the authors are trying to answer by doing this research. Differentiate between qualitative and quantitative research methods and terminology. Specify which approach is used in the study. Explain whether the study is qualitative or quantitative by citing specific clues from the article, such as sample size, data collection techniques, the nature of the data collected, or the data analysis techniques used. Associate the chosen study with a specific research area of psychology based on the information on research area in Chapter 1 of your course textbook.
Explain your reasoning. Summarize ethical issues which were addressed in the article and analyze the ethical principles applied. Can you discern additional ethical issues that apply but were not mentioned
Paper For Above instruction
The research article selected for this analysis is "Factors influencing the uptake of memory compensations: A qualitative analysis" by Baldwin, Powell, and Lorenc (2011). This study investigates the various factors that affect individuals' use of memory compensation strategies, aiming to understand both the personal and environmental influences on this behavior. The authors seek to answer questions related to what motivates or hinders the adoption of memory aids among people with memory impairments, which can inform intervention development and improve quality of life for this population.
In assessing the research methodology, it is essential to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Quantitative research involves numerical data collection and statistical analysis, aiming to quantify variables and determine relationships or effects. Conversely, qualitative research explores phenomena through non-numerical data, such as interviews or observations, with an emphasis on understanding experiences, motivations, and contextual factors.
This particular study employs a qualitative research approach. The authors utilized semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of participants, which included individuals with memory impairments and caregivers. The data collected consisted of detailed textual responses capturing personal experiences, perceptions, and contextual influences related to memory compensation strategies. The analysis involved thematic coding, identifying patterns and themes within the data to elucidate factors influencing the adoption of such strategies. The detailed narrative data and thematic analysis are hallmark features of qualitative methodology, emphasizing depth over numerical measurement.
This study aligns with the area of clinical or health psychology, focusing on cognitive and behavioral interventions to improve functioning among individuals with memory deficits. It explores psychological processes, adaptation mechanisms, and environmental adaptations—key concerns within applied health psychology aimed at reducing the impact of cognitive impairments.
Regarding ethical considerations, the authors addressed key principles such as informed consent, confidentiality, and voluntary participation, as is standard in research involving human subjects. Participants were provided with detailed information about the study's purpose, procedures, and their rights, and consent was obtained prior to participation. The authors also maintained strict confidentiality by anonymizing data and securely storing interview transcripts.
Additional ethical issues not explicitly mentioned but relevant include ensuring cultural competence, especially since participants’ backgrounds might influence their perceptions and willingness to participate. Researchers should also be vigilant of potential psychological distress caused during interviews about personal memory difficulties. Keeping empathetic communication and offering support or referrals when needed are ethical imperatives that could enhance the ethical rigor of such studies.
Overall, the study employs a qualitative approach suitable for exploring subjective experiences and is grounded in ethical research standards that prioritize participant well-being and integrity of data. Understanding these aspects is crucial for evaluating the validity and ethical soundness of research in applied psychology fields.
References
- Baldwin, V. N., Powell, T., & Lorenc, L. (2011). Factors influencing the uptake of memory compensations: A qualitative analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21(4).
- Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
- Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage.
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
- Bloor, M., & Wood, S. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods. Sage.
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. Sage.