Research Design Refers To The Specific Type Of Study 076505

Research Design Refers To The Specific Type Of Study That You Will Con

Research design refers to the specific type of study that you will conduct. Research design is normally consistent with one’s philosophical worldview and the methodological approach the researcher chooses. In this case, you are using a quantitative methodology. Quantitative research designs can be experimental and non-experimental. You will be using a non-experimental design that can include descriptive statistics, correlational or causal-comparative research methods.

Research methods refer to specific procedures selected based on the chosen design. This is where you will provide detail on how you collected and analyzed your data. For quantitative methodologies, research methods can be quite detailed and require that attention be paid to recruitment, sampling, sampling frame, sample size, surveys, pilot tests, observations, data collection, data analysis, statistical procedures, data interpretation, coding, validity, reliability, generalizability, reporting, etc. For this assignment, you will develop the research design for the Sun Coast project, utilizing this the attached template to complete your assignment. research design submission should include the below elements.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a robust research design is fundamental to the success of any empirical investigation, particularly in the context of a quantitative study such as the Sun Coast project. This paper discusses the rationale behind the chosen methodology, type of research design, specific methods employed, data collection techniques, sampling strategies, and statistical analysis procedures, aligning each with the overarching research questions and hypotheses.

Research Methodology

The Sun Coast project adopts a non-experimental, quantitative research methodology, prioritizing descriptive and correlational techniques. This choice is driven by the nature of the research problem, which aims to examine relationships and describe phenomena without manipulating variables. Unlike experimental designs, which involve intervention and control groups to establish causality, non-experimental methods facilitate the analysis of existing conditions and associations in real-world settings, aligning with the project's objective to understand current patterns and relationships among variables.

The selected non-experimental approach contrasts with experimental designs, which, while valuable for establishing causality, require greater control over extraneous variables and resource-intensive procedures. Given the practical constraints and the descriptive aims of the Sun Coast project, a non-experimental design is more appropriate for capturing authentic data reflecting current phenomena.

Research Design

The research design for the Sun Coast project is primarily descriptive and correlational. A descriptive design enables the detailed characterization of variables related to the research problem, providing insights into current states and distributions within the population. Correlational design allows for the examination of relationships between variables without inferring causation, which aligns well with the project's objectives of understanding associations rather than establishing cause-effect relationships.

This choice is rationalized by the project’s aim to explore the nature of existing phenomena and the relationships among multiple variables across the community or setting. Given that the research does not manipulate or intervene but rather observes and measures, the descriptive and correlational framework offers the most suitable structure for generating valid, reliable insights into the phenomena under investigation.

Research Methods

The research questions and hypotheses outlined in Unit II guide the selection of specific methods. For instance, if a hypothesis posits that there is a relationship between community engagement and access to resources, a correlational method involving surveys will be employed to test this association. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize demographic characteristics and baseline measures. If another hypothesis involves differences across groups, such as varying levels of service satisfaction among different neighborhoods, then a casual-comparative method, such as t-tests or ANOVA, will be utilized.

Specifically, for data related to perceptions and attitudes, structured questionnaires with Likert-scale items will be administered. For exploratory questions regarding patterns or distributions, descriptive statistics such as frequencies, means, and standard deviations will be used. For hypotheses examining relationships, Pearson correlation coefficients and regression analyses will be conducted to identify and quantify these associations. When comparing groups, t-tests or ANOVA will test for statistically significant differences, chosen based on the number of groups and the nature of the variables.

Data Collection Methods

Data collection in the Sun Coast project primarily involves surveys distributed to community members and stakeholders to capture quantitative data related to variables of interest, such as resource accessibility, satisfaction levels, and community engagement. Surveys are selected for their efficiency in reaching diverse respondents and their ability to produce standardized data suitable for statistical analysis.

Additional data may be obtained from existing records or reports to supplement survey findings, especially for contextual or demographic variables. Observation may also be employed for behavioral or environmental assessments, although its use is limited in this non-experimental design. Each research question and hypothesis determines specific data collection tools; for example, attitudes and perceptions are measured through validated survey instruments, while demographic data are captured via structured questionnaires.

Sampling Design

The sampling strategy most appropriate for the Sun Coast project is stratified random sampling. This approach ensures representativeness across key subgroups within the target population, such as different neighborhoods, age groups, or socioeconomic statuses. Stratification improves the precision of estimates and enhances the generalizability of findings by capturing variability across relevant strata.

Rationale for this choice stems from the need to account for underlying heterogeneity within the population and to ensure that all significant subgroups are adequately represented in the sample. Random sampling within strata reduces selection bias and increases confidence that the sample accurately reflects the characteristics of the broader community.

Data Analysis Procedures

The analysis plan involves a sequence of statistical procedures aligned with each research hypothesis. To examine relationships between variables, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analyses will be performed, chosen for their capacity to quantify the strength and nature of associations. When comparing means between groups, t-tests or ANOVA will be used depending on the number of groups involved.

For example, if the hypothesis states that higher community engagement is associated with greater resource access, correlation and regression analyses will test this relationship. If differences in satisfaction levels are hypothesized across neighborhoods, ANOVA will determine whether significant differences exist among groups. These methods are appropriate due to their robustness, ease of interpretation, and suitability for the scale and type of data collected.

Ensuring validity and reliability involves pilot testing survey instruments, consistent data coding procedures, and applying appropriate statistical tests to control for Type I and Type II errors. Overall, these analysis strategies provide a comprehensive framework for testing hypotheses and advancing understanding of the researched phenomena.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill.
• Trochim, W. M. (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base. Atomic Dog Publishing.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
• Babbie, E. (2015). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Houghton Mifflin.
• Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. SAGE Publications.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-based dentistry, 7(1), 24-25.