Research Exercise: Consequences And Conclusion Section III

Research Exercise Consequences And Conclusionsection Iii Of The Inte

Research Exercise Consequences And Conclusionsection Iii Of The Inte

Research Exercise – Consequences and Conclusion Section III of the Integrated Research Essay is your FINAL section and asks you to outline the following: 1. What are two major consequences of Side 1 “succeeding?” 2. What are two major consequences of Side 2 “succeeding?” 3. Given these consequences, what are proposed solutions or compromises?

Finding Consequences Start with an Internet search using the phrase: Consequences OR Effects of (your topic/conflict). Consequences OR effects of (your topic/conflict). Try to find 2 sources for Each Side: SIDE ONE Source 1 (in correct MLA): Summary (3-4 sentences about what you learned) Source 2 (in correct MLA): Summary (3-4 sentences about what you learned) SIDE TWO Source 1 (in correct MLA): Summary (3-4 sentences about what you learned) Source 2 (in correct MLA): Summary (3-4 sentences about what you learned)

Exploring Compromise or Solution Start with an Internet search using the phrase: Compromise or Solution for (your conflict). Try to find 2 additional sources: Source 1 (in correct MLA): Summary (3-4 sentences about what you learned) Source 2 (in correct MLA): Summary (3-4 sentences about what you learned)

Navigate a Database After reading about consequences and possible compromises, go to the CONSEQUENCE tab in the 110 Library Guide AND the COMPROMISE tab. Use Academic Search Premier and find at least one “scholarly article” on your topic. Scholarly Article Citation: Article Summary: Use ProQuest Central and find at least one “scholarly article” on your topic. Article Summary: Section III Outline: As we visit these sites, we are looking for information for the chart below. As you find the necessary information fill it in below.

What are two major consequences of Side 1 “succeeding?”

Consequence 1: Citation:

Consequence 2: Citation:

What are two major consequences of Side 2 “succeeding?”

Consequence 1: Citation:

Consequence 2: Citation:

What are possible Compromises or Solutions?

Compromise/Solution 1: Citation:

Compromise/Solution 1: Citation:

What other conclusions have you drawn?

Paper For Above instruction

Immigration remains one of the most debated issues in the United States, often characterized by conflicting perspectives on its economic and cultural impacts. The consequences of either side succeeding—be it stricter immigration enforcement or more lenient policies—offer significant implications that warrant careful examination. This paper explores the potential outcomes of each scenario, along with possible compromises based on scholarly and credible sources to foster a balanced approach to immigration policy reform.

Consequences of Side 1 Succeeding

If stricter immigration policies are successfully implemented, one major consequence would be a reduction in undocumented immigration, which could lead to decreased strain on public resources such as healthcare, education, and social services. According to a report by the Department of Homeland Security, enhanced border enforcement aims to curb illegal crossings, which could reduce the economic burden associated with undocumented immigrants relying on public benefits (DHS, 2019). However, a downside is the economic impact due to the potential decrease in labor supply, especially in low-wage industries where immigrants constitute a significant workforce. The Economic Policy Institute highlights that such enforcement might lead to labor shortages in sectors like agriculture, construction, and hospitality, which depend heavily on immigrant labor (EP Institute, 2017).

Consequences of Side 2 Succeeding

If more lenient or immigration-friendly policies succeed, it could result in an increase in immigrant integration and economic contribution. Scholars like Claire Felter and Danielle Renwick note that immigrants are vital for economic growth, entrepreneurship, and cultural diversity in America (Felt er & Renwick, 2019). An increase in legal immigration could bolster the workforce, stimulate innovation, and support demographic stability as native-born populations age. However, there are concerns about increased demand for public services, possibly straining welfare systems and health resources, and fueling social tensions as native populations perceive competition for jobs and resources (Economic Policy Institute, 2017).

Proposed Solutions or Compromises

One potential compromise involves implementing a balanced immigration reform that tightens border security while providing pathways to legal status for certain undocumented immigrants who meet specific criteria, such as employment history and community integration. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy exemplifies a solution that recognizes the contributions of young undocumented immigrants while addressing enforcement concerns (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2019). Another compromise could be increasing investment in workforce development programs to ensure domestic workers are protected and prepared for jobs immigrants currently fill, minimizing economic disruption. Scholars suggest comprehensive reform that includes targeted enforcement, legal pathways, and investment in human capital as a sustainable approach (Felt er & Renwick, 2019).

Additional Conclusions

In conclusion, the debate over immigration success hinges on balancing economic benefits with social and security concerns. Both restrictive policies and more welcoming approaches can produce positive and negative outcomes, and a nuanced compromise appears essential for sustainable immigration reform. Evidence suggests that policies fostering integration, legal pathways, and strategic enforcement can mitigate potential adverse effects while maximizing economic opportunities and social cohesion.

References

  • Department of Homeland Security. (2019). Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). DHS.gov
  • Economic Policy Institute. (2017). The Economic Impact of Immigration Policy. epi.org
  • Felt er, Claire, and Danielle Renwick. (2019). The U.S. Immigration Debate. Council on Foreign Relations.
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2019). Immigration Enforcement Initiatives. DHS.gov
  • Amadeo, Kimberly. (2017). How Do Trump's Immigration Plans Affect You? The Balance.
  • Claire, Felter, and Renwick, Danielle. (2019). The U.S. Immigration Debate. CFR.
  • Nicholson, Michael D. (2017). The Facts on Immigration Today: 2017 Edition. Center for American Progress.
  • Schmidt, Jenna, et al. (2012). Impact of Illegal Immigration in the United States.
  • Welch, Michael. (2017). Ironies of social control and the criminalization of immigrants. Crime, Law and Social Change.