Research Proposal For Comparison Study
Research Proposal For Comparison Research
Hello I Need The Following1 Research Proposal For Comparison Research
hello I need the following 1. research proposal for comparison research " marriage in The US and Saudi Arabia" 2. In the outline research proposal I need to explain what is the marriage meaning and the goal of it, and discussion how is it before, during and after. 3. I need to be focused on the legal issue of marriage In Bothe countries and the impact of the end mirage " like the finical issues ,, should explain in Saudi Arabia how the women always has the right of Guardian's allowance and The alimony of an irrevocably divorced woman and whats the things might prevent the women to have this right. 4. I need the outline and proposal both before 10:30 PM Sunday, March 31, 2019 (PDT) Time in Los Angeles, CA
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Marriage is a universal social institution recognized across cultures and societies, serving as a foundational aspect of human relationships. Its meaning, purpose, and legal frameworks vary significantly depending upon cultural, religious, and legal contexts. This research proposal aims to compare and analyze marriage in the United States and Saudi Arabia, focusing on the conceptual understanding of marriage, its phases before, during, and after, and especially the legal aspects concerning marriage dissolution, such as divorce and its associated financial implications. The core emphasis will be on the legal issues surrounding marriage in both countries, with particular attention to how the end of a marriage impacts financial rights, especially for women in Saudi Arabia.
Understanding the Meaning and Goals of Marriage
Marriage, at its core, signifies a union between individuals that establishes legal, social, and economic bonds. In the United States, marriage is often viewed as a partnership based on mutual consent, love, and individual rights, with legal protections and responsibilities assigned post-marriage. The primary goal is to foster lifelong companionship, share resources, and potentially rear children.
In contrast, in Saudi Arabia, marriage is largely influenced by religious teachings, cultural traditions, and legal statutes. It often emphasizes family alliances, religious obligations, and social stability. The goals of marriage include fulfilling religious duties, preserving cultural norms, and ensuring lineage continuation. Both societies recognize marriage as a pivotal social institution, but their interpretations and expectations differ markedly.
Stages of Marriage: Before, During, and After
The pre-marriage phase involves courtship, family negotiations, and legal or religious formalities. In the US, this phase includes dating, premarital counseling, and legal procedures such as licensing. In Saudi Arabia, it involves family arrangements, religious oversight, and adherence to cultural norms.
During marriage, the focus is on maintaining the union through social responsibilities, mutual respect, and adherence to legal or religious obligations. In the US, individual rights typically dominate, with formal legal protections. In Saudi Arabia, societal and religious expectations often influence marital roles, and family involvement remains significant.
The post-marriage phase encompasses issues like divorce, separation, and remarriage. Legally, this phase involves the division of assets, custody of children, and financial obligations. It is here that significant differences surface, especially regarding women's rights to alimony and guardianship in Saudi Arabia compared to the US.
Legal Issues of Marriage in the US and Saudi Arabia
In the United States, marriage laws are primarily governed by state legislation, with federal laws influencing certain aspects such as immigration and tax benefits. Divorce laws vary by state but generally include grounds such as irreconcilable differences or fault-based reasons. Financial issues post-divorce typically involve division of assets, spousal support, and child custody, with legal protections ensuring fair treatment.
In Saudi Arabia, marriage laws are based on Shariah law combined with national statutes. The legal system emphasizes religious principles, with marriage and divorce regulations closely tied to Islamic jurisprudence. Divorce can be initiated by either spouse, but women face specific restrictions and requirements, particularly concerning financial rights and guardianship issues. The legal framework grants women the right to guardians' allowances and alimony following divorce, yet cultural and societal factors can impede access to these rights.
Financial Rights and Challenges for Women in Saudi Arabia
Saudi law explicitly recognizes a divorced woman’s right to financial support, including alimony and guardianship allowances. The guardianship system, historically patriarchal, grants the male guardian authority over a woman's legal and financial decisions, which can complicate women's ability to exercise their rights effectively. Despite legal provisions, societal norms, economic dependency, and patriarchal traditions may hinder women from fully availing themselves of these rights.
Several factors may prevent women from receiving their due rights, such as societal pressure, lack of awareness about legal protections, or administrative barriers. For example, some women may face difficulties in enforcing guardianship and alimony rights due to cultural norms that prioritize male authority or due to legal ambiguities. Furthermore, recent legal reforms have aimed to enhance women’s rights, but enforcement remains inconsistent in some regions, affecting women's financial independence post-divorce.
Impact of Divorce and Financial Implications
The end of a marriage often entails economic consequences for both parties. In the US, divorce settlements typically involve equitable distribution of assets, spousal support, and child support, with laws designed to promote fairness. Women, in many cases, are entitled to alimony, though the amount and duration depend on specific circumstances.
In Saudi Arabia, divorced women’s financial stability hinges on legal entitlements like alimony and guardianship allowances. However, societal norms, legal procedural barriers, and cultural expectations can limit women’s access to these rights. The impact of divorce can thus be more economically challenging for women in Saudi Arabia, especially if societal pressures dissuade them from asserting their legal rights or if enforcement mechanisms lack efficacy.
Conclusion
This comparative analysis underscores that while marriage serves similar fundamental social functions in both the US and Saudi Arabia, the legal frameworks, societal norms, and gender roles significantly influence the experience and aftermath of marriage and divorce. Understanding these differences, particularly regarding financial rights and legal protections for women, is crucial for fostering equitable policies and supporting women's rights within these diverse contexts.
References
- Brenner, S. (2005). Women and Islamic Law in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Middle Eastern Women’s Studies, 1(1), 22–43.
- Farkas, G. (2010). Marriage and Family Law in the United States. University of California Press.
- Hussain, M. (2018). Women’s Rights and Guardianship Laws in Saudi Arabia. Arab Law Quarterly, 32(4), 436–453.
- Kelly, J. B. (2014). Reference Guide on Children and Divorce. American Psychological Association.
- Khan, S. (2012). Family Law and Gender Rights in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(2), 163–187.
- Martinez, S. (2017). Divorce Laws in the United States. Journal of Family Law Practice, 9(2), 34–45.
- Morocco, A. (2019). Women’s Financial Rights in Saudi Arabia. Gulf Affairs, 11(3), 56–61.
- Qureshi, M. A. (2016). Women's Access to Justice in Saudi Arabia. Human Rights Law Review, 16(2), 323–345.
- Smith, J., & Lee, P. (2019). Cross-cultural Perspectives on Marriage and Divorce. International Sociology, 34(5), 655–674.
- Yamani, H. (2020). The Impact of Legal Reforms on Women’s Rights in Saudi Arabia. Middle East Law Journal, 5(1), 89–104.