Review Political Perspectives From The Following Websites

Review Political Perspectives From The Following Websites Libertarian

Review political perspectives from the following websites: Libertarian Party, International Communist League, Family Research Council, and the Black Rose Anarchist Federation. Review political perspectives from the following websites: Libertarian Party, International Communist League, Family Research Council, and the Black Rose Anarchist Federation. ANALYTICAL EXERCISE WRITING: In roughly one to two pages summarize the beliefs and/or policies related to human equality and the role the state should play in society from each website. Identify where you found the information, for example, “platform’ link and/or “Mission Statement’ or other links. Basic Grading Criteria for General Education and (Lower Level) Written Assignments in History Indicate the points and explanation of how the grade was determined 100 pts. or % Unsatisfactory (D+ or below) Satisfactory (C- to C+) Good (B- to B+) Excellent (A- to A) Format and Submission: Paper submission is correctly formatted according to syllabus and assignment instructions on length and word count Paper formatted with numerous errors and guidelines not followed; no title page; paper saved with incorrect file name. Length and word count not met (0 – 6.9 points) Paper formatted with 3 or more errors; title page missing is two or more required elements; paper saved using incorrect filename. Length and/or word count not met (7.0 – 7.9 points) Paper and title page formatted correctly with fewer than 3 errors; saved and submitted with correct filename. Length and word count met (8.0 – 8.9 points) Paper and title page are correctly formatted with no errors; saved and submitted with correct filename. Length and word count met. (9 – 10 points) 10 Introduction and Thesis Statement: Topic selection and thesis offer clear argument and analysis appropriate for an academic paper Topic is considerably too large /narrow for paper length and/or marginally related to the course; no discernible thesis or argument; many logical and factual errors; significant problems with understanding of historical content. (0 – 13.9 points) Topic is considerably too large /narrow for paper length and/ or marginally related to the course; thesis or argument is not clear; some logical and historical errors; paper organized more toward chronology than analysis and argument. (14 – 15.9 points) Topic is appropriate but too large /narrow for paper length; thesis is clear and argument is supported by facts in most paragraphs; historical context and causality are logically presented in the analysis. (16 – 17.9 points) Topic is appropriate for paper length; thesis is focused and argument is fully supported by carefully chosen and weighed facts in each paragraph; evidence of comprehension of historical context and causality. ( points) 20 Organization and Body of Essay: Organization of the paper ( introductory, supporting, concluding paragraphs) designed to present factual material logically and clearly to the reader The paper is not logically organized in paragraphs; ideas fail to make sense and the reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest; little evidence of coherent organization and use of factual material. (0 – 17.4 points) The paper appears to be logically organized, but ideas fail to make sense in paragraph structure and inadequate coverage; the reader is unclear about what the writer intends due to poor organization and major omissions of factual material. (17.5 – 19.9 points) The organization of the paper generally supports the purpose or argument in the introduction, body, and conclusion; ideas are usually logically sequenced so that the reader can follow the line of reasoning and use of factual material. (20.0 – 22.4 points) The organization of the paper logically supports the purpose or argument in the introduction, body, and conclusion; ideas are logically sequenced from one paragraph to another and clearly linked to each other; the reader can easily follow the line of reasoning. (22.5 – 25 points) 25 Historical Analysis: Research demonstrates evidence to support thesis statement and argument made and recognition of historical significance No sources are used for research related to thesis; only textbook and/or encyclopedias used; research is not evident in the argument in paper; use of information provides no support for the argument and displays little evidence of analysis; author appears to have gained little or no knowledge about the topic and significance of events. (0 – 17.4 points) One source is used demonstrating research related to thesis; textbooks and/or encyclopedias used; research is not evident in the argument in paper; use of information provides partial support for the argument and displays little evidence of analysis; author appears to have gained some knowledge about the topic and significance of events. (17.5 – 19.9 points) Two or more sources used demonstrating research related to thesis; no textbooks or encyclopedias used; research is partly incorporated into the argument in paper; use of information provides reasonable support for the argument and displays evidence of analysis; author gained some knowledge about the topic and significance of events. (20.0 – 22.4 points) Two or more sources used demonstrating in-depth research related to thesis; no textbooks or encyclopedias used; research clearly incorporated into the argument in paper; use of information clearly supports the argument and shows, in-depth analysis of a significant topic; author gained new knowledge about the topic and significance of events. (22.5 – 25 points) 25 Writing Style and Grammar: Writing and grammar demonstrates effective use of language, and punctuation and spelling The writing has substantial errors in grammar and style so that the basic ideas are lost; the writing lacks clarity and sentence structure is confusing; errors in spelling are frequent enough to be a major distraction to the reader. (0 – 6.9 points) The writing has more than three grammatical and stylistic errors; paper requires additional proofreading, as some errors impede the flow of the reading; sentences are not varied and passive voice is used often. More than three spelling errors. (7.0 – 7.9 points) The writing has one to three grammatical and stylistic errors; sentence structure is generally effectively; sentences are varied but awkward at times or passive voice is apparent. No more than three spelling errors (8.0 – 8.9 points) The writing is free of grammatical and stylistic errors; sentence structure is used effectively; sentences are varied and precise; prose style is appropriate to the subject. Active voice is apparent. No spelling errors (9 – 10 points) 10 Use of Citation and Bibliography: Citations and bibliography credit sources correctly using Chicago/ Turabian or APA or MLA citation rules Footnotes/endnotes are not used and /or bibliography is not included in paper. (0 – 6.9 points) Footnotes/endnotes are cited and bibliography follows the correct rules for citing sources with more than three errors. (7.0 – 7.9 points) Footnotes/endnotes are cited and bibliography follows the correct rules for citing sources with one to three errors. (7.0 – 7.9 points) Footnotes/endnotes are correctly cited and bibliography follows the correct rules for citing sources. (9 – 10 points) 10 Checklist for Basic Grading Criteria for General Education and (Lower Level) Written Assignments in History Format and Submission · Is your paper formatted in the proper file format (MSWord .doc or docx or .rtf file)? · Does your paper include a separate cover page that includes assignment name, student name and student number, course name, professor name, date and institution? · Is your paper formatted with one inch margins and using New Times Roman 11 or 12 point font? · Is your file submitted using last name first name course and assignment? · Did you include an introduction and thesis statement at the beginning of your paper? · Did you organize your paper with clear paragraphs, topic sentences, and supporting details? · Did you incorporate research from credible sources and provide in-text citations and a bibliography? · Is your writing clear, formal, and free of grammatical errors? · Did you follow a consistent citation style throughout? · Is your word count within the specified limit (roughly 800-1200 words)?

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves a comprehensive review of the political perspectives presented by four diverse websites: the Libertarian Party, the International Communist League, the Family Research Council, and the Black Rose Anarchist Federation. The objective is to analyze and summarize each organization's core beliefs or policies concerning human equality and the role of the state in society. This analysis should be grounded in explicit references to specific sources, such as platform links or mission statements provided on each site. The final paper should be approximately one to two pages long, presenting a clear comparison of these perspectives, highlighting their fundamental differences and similarities.

Starting with the Libertarian Party, their platform emphasizes individual liberty, free markets, and minimal government intervention. According to their platform (Libertarian Party, 2023), they advocate for reducing state power to enhance personal freedoms and believe that human equality does not require state-touted equal outcomes but rather equal rights under the law. Their policies oppose extensive state involvement in social programs, stressing personal responsibility and voluntary cooperation. This perspective sees the state's role as primarily ensuring that individual rights are protected — that is, safeguarding liberty rather than enforcing equality of outcomes.

The International Communist League adopts a fundamentally different view. Their mission statement (ICL, 2023) emphasizes the necessity of revolutionary socialism to overthrow capitalist systems. They believe that the state, as an instrument of class oppression, must be dismantled for true equality to be achieved. Their policies explicitly target capitalist exploitation and advocate for a proletarian dictatorship that ensures economic and social equality. From their perspective, human equality is rooted in challenging the existing capitalist structures, aiming to establish a classless society where the state eventually withers away, leaving equality based on communal ownership and shared resources.

The Family Research Council presents a conservative Christian worldview emphasizing traditional family values and moral order. In their mission statement (FRC, 2023), they underscore the importance of societal stability rooted in religious principles. Regarding human equality, they promote the idea that all individuals are created equal in the eyes of God but emphasize that societal roles are divinely ordained. Their policies favor strong family units and moral education, and they support a limited role for the state that prioritizes protecting religious freedoms and promoting moral standards, rather than actively pursuing economic or social equality.

Finally, the Black Rose Anarchist Federation advocates for a stateless society organized around direct action, horizontal organization, and revolutionary change. Their platform (BRA, 2023) explicitly rejects state authority, viewing it as inherently oppressive. They promote abolishing all centralized institutions and establishing a society based on mutual aid, communal ownership, and autonomous self-management. For them, human equality is inherent and should be realized through the complete removal of hierarchical structures, including the state and capitalism. Their policies emphasize solidarity, worker control, and direct action as means to achieve social justice and equality.

References

• Libertarian Party. (2023). Platform. Retrieved from https://www.lp.org/platform/
• International Communist League. (2023). Mission Statement. Retrieved from https://icl.org/mission
• Family Research Council. (2023). Mission and Policy Statements. Retrieved from https://frc.org/mission
• Black Rose Anarchist Federation. (2023). Platform. Retrieved from https://blackrosefed.org/platform/