Review Your Problem Or Issue And The Cultural Assessm 201017 ✓ Solved

Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment. Co

Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment.

Consider how the findings connect to your topic and intervention for your capstone change project.

Write a list of three to five objectives for your proposed intervention.

Below each objective, provide a one or two sentence rationale.

After writing your objectives, provide a rationale for how your proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction: Reviewing a problem through a cultural lens is essential for designing an intervention that is not only effective but also ethically sound and just. The cultural assessment illuminates values, beliefs, and structural barriers that shape how individuals perceive, experience, and engage with care. In the context of a capstone change project, it is critical that findings from this assessment connect clearly to the chosen topic and the proposed intervention, ensuring relevance, acceptability, and potential for real-world impact among diverse populations (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019; Tervalon & Murray-García, 1998). Aligning patient-centered care with ethical principles—autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice—supports respect for persons while acknowledging social determinants of health that influence outcomes (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). Embracing cultural humility helps prevent paternalism and promotes equity by acknowledging power dynamics and social context (Tervalon & Murray-García, 1998). The objectives should be concrete, feasible, and directed at reducing disparities in access, outcomes, and lived experiences of care, in keeping with calls for health equity and social justice (Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014). The capstone change project benefits from a clear articulation of how three to five objectives will advance autonomy and social justice for individuals from diverse backgrounds (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016).

Objective 1: Clarify the problem or issue in the context of the cultural assessment and current evidence.

Rationale: Grounding the problem in cultural context ensures the intervention addresses real barriers and leverages facilitators identified by the assessment and supported by the literature on social determinants of health and equity (Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014; World Health Organization, 2008). This framing also aligns with ethical principles that require considering how social context influences patient choices and outcomes (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019).

Objective 2: Design an intervention that supports autonomous decision-making by providing accessible information and culturally appropriate decision aids.

Rationale: Respect for autonomy requires timely, understandable, and culturally consonant information to facilitate informed choices. Cultural humility and sensitivity are essential to avoid coercion or paternalism and to support meaningful engagement with diverse patients and communities (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019; Tervalon & Murray-García, 1998).

Objective 3: Engage diverse stakeholders in co-design and governance of the intervention.

Rationale: Inclusive participation strengthens relevance, legitimacy, and uptake of the intervention. Cultural humility and community engagement principles encourage ongoing dialogue, shared leadership, and responsiveness to community needs (Tervalon & Murray-García, 1998; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016).

Objective 4: Establish equity-focused metrics and evaluation processes to monitor impact on autonomy, access, and outcomes across populations.

Rationale: Evaluating progress through an equity lens helps identify unintended effects and ensures that improvements reduce disparities. Frameworks on the social determinants of health and health equity guide the selection of indicators linked to autonomy, justice, and population health (Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014; World Health Organization, 2008).

Objective 5: Plan for sustainability, policy alignment, and potential scaling of the intervention.

Rationale: For lasting impact, the project should integrate with existing systems and policy contexts, guided by change-management theories that emphasize leadership, coalition-building, and iterative adaptation (Kotter, 1996; Lewin, 1947).

Rationale for autonomy and social justice: The proposed project centers autonomy as a core ethical and practical outcome—facilitating individuals' capacity to make informed choices aligned with their values within a framework of respect and support. Simultaneously, the plan foregrounds social justice by explicitly addressing structural barriers, engaging diverse communities, and monitoring equity in outcomes. This approach draws on foundational bioethics to protect personhood and rights (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019), and on cultural humility to avoid biases and power imbalances in care (Tervalon & Murray-García, 1998). By incorporating the social determinants of health and equity-focused evaluation, the project aligns with evidence that disparities arise from upstream factors and that intentional, community-informed interventions can shift the distribution of health advantages (Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014; World Health Organization, 2008). The change process is framed by established models of organizational transformation, ensuring that ethical commitments translate into sustainable practice changes (Lewin, 1947; Kotter, 1996). This integrated approach fosters autonomy and social justice across diverse populations while enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of the capstone change project (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016; Institute of Medicine, 2011).

Conclusion: By connecting the cultural assessment to a concrete, multi-objective intervention plan, the capstone project can advance autonomy for individuals while promoting social justice across diverse populations. The alignment with ethical principles, humility, community engagement, and equity-focused evaluation provides a rigorous pathway from problem framing to sustainable impact. The integration of change-management theory strengthens the likelihood that the intervention will endure beyond initial implementation and contribute to broader improvements in health equity and patient-centered care (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019; Lewin, 1947; Kotter, 1996; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016).

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in training. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117-125.
  • Purnell, L. (2009). The Purnell Model for Cultural Competence. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 20(3), 238-245.
  • Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2014). The social determinants of health: It's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(S2), 19-31.
  • Marmot, M. (2005). The social determinants of health: The solid facts. World Health Organization.
  • World Health Organization. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Institute of Medicine (US). (2011). The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Related Assignments