Review Your Problem Or Issue And The Study Materials ✓ Solved

Review your problem or issue and the study materials to form

Review your problem or issue and the study materials to formulate a PICOT question for your capstone project change proposal. A PICOT question starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention used to address the problem must be a nursing practice intervention. Include a comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process. Formulate a PICOT question using the PICOT format that addresses the clinical nursing problem. The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project change proposal. Clearly identify the clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome. Describe the problem in the PICOT question related to: 1) Evidence-based solution, 2) Nursing intervention, 3) Patient care, 4) Health care agency, 5) Nursing practice.

Paper For Above Instructions

Proposed PICOT framing. In adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery in the acute care setting (P), implementing a nurse-led early mobilization protocol (I) compared with standard postoperative care without structured mobilization (C) is expected to reduce length of stay, decrease postoperative pulmonary complications, and improve functional mobility within 30 days (O) during the immediate postoperative period (T). This PICOT question provides a clear research and practice-oriented framework for a capstone project change proposal (Sackett et al., 1996).

Rationale and relevance. The clinical problem centers on postoperative immobility contributing to complications such as pneumonia, venous thromboembolism, delirium in vulnerable patients, muscle atrophy, and delayed functional recovery. Evidence-based practice supports mobility as a core nursing intervention to enhance outcomes and shorten hospital stay (Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, Stillwell, & Williamson, 2010; Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, 2014). By articulating a PICOT question, the student can ground the proposal in a structured inquiry that links patient outcomes to nursing interventions and organizational readiness (Polit & Beck, 2017).

Evidence-based solution. The proposed intervention—an evidence-informed, nurse-driven early mobilization protocol—integrates best practices for perioperative care. The core of the solution rests on moving patients with appropriate safety checks earlier in the postoperative period, with standardized thresholds for ambulation, activity progression, pain control, and documentation. This aligns with foundational EBP principles that emphasize integrating research findings with clinical expertise and patient preferences (Sackett et al., 1996; Melnyk et al., 2010; Polit & Beck, 2017).

Nursing intervention details. The intervention includes: (a) nurse-led assessment of mobility readiness within 6–12 hours post-surgery; (b) progressive ambulation plan tailored to individual mobility status; (c) standardized orders for sit-to-stand transfers, walker-assisted ambulation, and supervised gait training; (d) multimodal pain management aligned with mobilization goals; and (e) consistent documentation of activity level, tolerance, and barriers. Education for patients and families reinforces the rationale for movement and expected benefits. Implementation requires unit-level protocols, staff training, and collaboration with physical therapy when indicated (Burns & Grove, 2011; Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, Stillwell, & Williamson, 2010).

Comparison and timeframe. The comparison group receives standard postoperative care without a structured mobilization protocol, representing typical practice prior to change. The timeframe for implementation spans initiation within the first postoperative day and sustained application for a 6–8 week pilot period, with ongoing evaluation for longer-term adoption. This structure adheres to PICOT conventions and enables measurement of process and outcome indicators over a defined period (Sackett et al., 1996; Melnyk et al., 2014).

Outcome measures and evaluation. Primary outcomes include length of stay and postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes include time to ambulation, mobility scores, readmission rates, discharge disposition, and patient-reported functional status. Process measures encompass protocol adherence, time-to-first-ambulation, and documentation completeness. Data collection relies on electronic health records and standardized mobility checklists. Analysis focuses on comparing groups using appropriate statistical methods to determine whether early mobilization yields meaningful improvements (Polit & Beck, 2017; Melnyk et al., 2010).

Evidence base and rationale. The evidence base for early mobilization is robust in the perioperative and postoperative domains, with systematic reviews and guidelines underscoring mobility as a critical determinant of recovery and reduced complications (Sackett et al., 1996; World Health Organization, 2009; CDC, 2020). Applying EBP frameworks, the PICOT-driven proposal seeks to translate this evidence into consistent nursing practice and improved patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2014; Institute of Medicine, 2001).

Health care agency and nursing practice implications. The proposed change aligns with broader health system goals to improve quality, safety, and patient outcomes while reducing hospital-associated complications and costs. Successful implementation demands leadership support, staff education, resource alignment, and multidisciplinary collaboration. The PICOT approach helps demonstrate the relevance of nursing interventions to patient care, agency strategic goals, and nursing practice standards (Grol & Wensing, 2005; IOM, 2001).

Implementation considerations. Barriers may include staffing constraints, varying patient tolerance, and competing priorities on busy units. Facilitators include leadership endorsement, unit champions, ongoing education, and feedback loops. A pilot phase with iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles can identify barriers, refine protocols, and optimize outcomes. The PICOT framework supports rigorous evaluation and potential scale-up if results are favorable (AHRQ, 2013; Sackett et al., 1996).

Conclusion. The PICOT question provides a precise blueprint for the capstone project change proposal, linking a nursing intervention to tangible patient outcomes, practice implications, and organizational impact. By systematically integrating evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences, the proposed nurse-led early mobilization protocol has the potential to reduce complications, shorten hospitalization, and promote safer, more effective perioperative care (Melnyk et al., 2014; Polit & Beck, 2017).

References

  1. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72.
  2. Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). The seven steps of evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 40-47.
  3. Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2014). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
  4. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
  5. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2011). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.
  6. World Health Organization. (2009). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings. Atlanta, GA: CDC.
  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2013). Evidence-based practice center program: Making health care safer. Rockville, MD: AHRQ.
  9. Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2005). Improving patient care: Implementing evidence-based practice. BMJ, 330(7494), 132-133.
  10. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Related Assignments