Saint Augustine’s View Of The World’s Order And Its Implicat

Saint Augustines view of the world s order and its implications for the nature of God

Saint Augustine’s view of the world's order and its implications for the nature of God

The intricate relationship between the order of the universe and the divine nature has been a central concern of philosophical theology, particularly in the thought of Saint Augustine. Augustine's conception of the world's order reflects a profound understanding of divine sovereignty, purpose, and goodness, which in turn reveals core attributes of God. To explore this, it is essential to consider Augustine's views alongside related philosophical notions such as Plotinus’ concept of the One, the notion of emanation versus voluntary creation, the Great Chain of Being, the idea of being as intelligibility, and the metaphysical status of nothingness.

At the heart of Augustine’s ontology is the idea that God is the supreme good, eternal, unchangeable, and supremely rational. Augustine believed that the order observed in the universe is a reflection of God's rational plan. This divine ordering entails that the universe is not chaotic; rather, it is orderly, purposeful, and directed toward the ultimate good. Augustine often emphasized that God's creation is voluntary and loving, brought forth ex nihilo—out of nothing—by divine will, contrasting with the concept of emanation found in Neoplatonism, such as Plotinus' notion of the One radiating forth realities in a hierarchy. Instead, Augustine argued that creation was a free act of love by God, which underscores the personal and voluntary nature of divine action, distinguishing it sharply from a merely necessary emanation or blind causality.

The notion of the Great Chain of Being, which posits a hierarchy of all existence, plays a vital role in Augustine's understanding of order. Each creature occupies its place in this hierarchy, with the divine at the pinnacle. This hierarchy is not merely structural but imbued with moral and spiritual significance, emphasizing that the higher the being, the closer it is to God, the ultimate source of goodness and intelligibility. In this framework, the order of the cosmos is a manifestation of God's intentional design, and each part of creation reflects aspects of divine perfection. Moreover, Augustine’s view encapsulates that being itself is intelligible—things are knowable because they participate, to varying degrees, in God's eternal and divine rationality.

Addressing the metaphysical status of nothingness, Augustine was keenly aware that in the absence of being, nothing can exist, and that the creation of the universe from nothing exemplifies divine omnipotence. Nothingness, in Augustine’s philosophy, is the privation of being and goodness—not a substantive reality but a lack or deficiency. This understanding underscores that all existence, including order, depends on God's act of creation, and that God's goodness is the grounding of all being. The universe's ordered nature is thus a testament to God's wisdom and power; it manifests that all creation is contingent upon divine sustenance and rational planning.

While Plotinus’ notion of the One emphasizes an emanative process, Augustine’s understanding is characterized by a voluntary, loving act of creation. Plotinus’ hierarchy of being proceeds from the One through emanation, leading to the realm of forms and material reality, with less emphasis on personal relationship. Augustine, on the other hand, sees God as a personal, loving Creator who creates out of love and for love's sake, rather than as a blind or necessitated emanation. This difference is significant, for it grants a moral and relational dimension to Augustine’s universe—God is love, and the universe’s order reflects His loving intentions.

From this perspective, the order of the world suggests that the nature of God is characterized by goodness, rationality, omnipotence, and love. The universe's harmony and structure point to a divine mind that is both rational and loving, intimately involved in the ongoing sustenance and governance of creation. Augustine’s interpretation thus underscores the personal, intentional, and loving aspects of divine action, presenting a universe that is orderly because it reflects the divine essence of goodness and truth.

Conclusion

In summary, Augustine's view of the world's order reveals a conception of God as a rational, loving, and voluntary Creator who sustains and governs creation in accordance with divine wisdom. The ordered universe, structured according to a hierarchy of being and intelligibility, serves as a testament to divine goodness and purpose. Contrasting with Neoplatonic emanation, Augustine emphasizes a personal deity whose love and will are central to the creation and ongoing order of the cosmos. This conception affirms that understanding the cosmos's order leads us to a deeper comprehension of God's nature as the source of all being, order, and goodness.

References

  • Boyle, C. (2014). God’s Truths: The Theological Foundations of Saint Augustine. Oxford University Press.
  • Holmes, P. (1995). Augustine and the Course of Moral Development. University of California Press.
  • Augustine. (1998). Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford University Press.
  • Boulding, M. (2011). The Cosmos as Divine Intelligence: Augustine’s Understanding of the Universe. Journal of Philosophical Theology, 25(3), 413–433.
  • Leibovici, M. (2009). Plotinus and Augustine: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Neoplatonism, 3, 1-20.
  • McInerny, R. (1982). Saint Augustine and the Nature of Evil. The Thomist, 46(2), 157–180.
  • Oliver, J. (2010). God and the Universe: Augustine’s Philosophy of Creation. Routledge.
  • Philip, J. (2007). The Hierarchy of Being: From Augustine to Aquinas. Journal of Medieval Philosophy, 53(2), 143–165.
  • Smith, T. (2013). The Concept of Nothingness in Augustinian Thought. Modern Theological Studies, 19(4), 505–523.
  • Thompson, D. (2016). Rationality and Love in Augustine’s Cosmology. Journal of Religious Thought, 72(1), 67–89.