School Of Business Learning Team Charter For 300-400 Level C

School Of Business Learning Team Charterfor 300 400 Level Coursesschoo

Develop a learning team charter that includes team member contact information, a project plan by week, and team expectations. The assignment involves completing tables for each section with participation in discussions, defining guidelines for weekly team assignments, roles, collaboration, communication, contributions, deadlines, and other considerations. The purpose is to establish clear guidelines for team collaboration throughout the course, ensuring equitable participation and effective communication, with a final deliverable submitted as a unified team effort.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of business education, effective teamwork is essential for cultivating collaboration, communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, and professional values among students. The development of a learning team charter is a foundational activity that guides students in establishing mutual expectations and operational procedures necessary for successful group projects. This paper presents a comprehensive learning team charter tailored for students enrolled in 300-400 level business courses, emphasizing clarity in roles, responsibilities, and communication strategies to ensure equitable participation and achievement of team goals.

First, the team member contact information is fundamental in facilitating efficient communication. Each member should provide their name, phone number, time zone, availability, and non-academic email addresses to ensure seamless connectivity. For instance, in a typical team, members might include students such as Stacy Rhodes from EST, available between 10 am - 12 pm and 4 pm – 10 pm, and Cameron Clarke, with flexible hours predominantly during weekends. Accurate contact details prevent miscommunication and enable swift resolution of issues that may arise during project execution.

The project plan by week serves as a roadmap for timely delivery of assignments. Students should collaboratively determine the schedule for each learning activity, including weekly deliverables and due dates. For example, Week 1 might involve team formation with no immediate deliverables, but early engagement is encouraged. Week 2 could focus on reviewing the team charter and project plan, with specific responsibilities assigned. Week 3 may entail analyzing sales performance data, requiring data collection, analysis, and reporting by designated members. Establishing clear timelines ensures the team stays on track and can allocate resources effectively.

Team expectations form the framework that guides interactions and work ethic. Ground rules for participation specify meeting frequency—such as weekly meetings every Sunday or via email or messaging platforms—and outline procedures for handling unmet expectations. For example, if a member fails to contribute, the team should communicate with the instructor to resolve the issue. Collaboration protocols emphasize the use of recommended communication channels, such as email, text, or conference calls, and establish conflict resolution pathways, including internal discussion and instructor intervention if necessary. Equitable contribution expectations involve dividing tasks fairly and posting assignments with clear role assignments to foster accountability.

Deadlines are critical to maintaining productivity. The team should agree on submission dates, with drafts due at least two days before the final deadline, allowing time for review and revisions. Changes or delays must be communicated promptly, and emergencies or unforeseen circumstances should be addressed as a group to maintain cohesion. Additional considerations might include peer evaluations or contingency plans to accommodate absence or workload fluctuations, ensuring the team remains adaptable.

In conclusion, a well-structured learning team charter enhances collaborative learning by establishing clear communication, participation standards, and timelines. Such an approach not only facilitates successful completion of coursework but also prepares students for professional teamwork environments, emphasizing accountability, transparency, and mutual respect. Implementing these guidelines supports a positive team dynamic that fosters academic success and professional development.

References

• University of Phoenix. (2014). Learning team toolkit: Team basics. University of Phoenix Library.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson.
• Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-48.
• Gottfredson, C., & Mosston, M. (1998). Contemporary Group Work Strategies in Education. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 62-65.
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Developing Technology-Enabled Blended Learning Approaches. The International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 203-220.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2020). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 421-435.
• Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C., et al. (2015). Does Teamwork Make a Difference? The Effectiveness of Team Training. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 213-227.
• Levi, D. (2015). Group Dynamics for Teams. Sage Publications.
• Hollenbeck, J. R., & Beersma, B. (2014). Teams in Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 77-101.
• Thompson, L. (2017). Making the Team: A Guide for Managers. Pearson Education.