Second Summary Paper On Epistemology To Be Completed By Satu

Second Summary Paper Epistemologyto Be Completed By Saturday At 1155

Second Summary Paper: Epistemology To be completed by Saturday at 11:55 pm Eastern Time. A 1-3 page paper on this topic is due in week 6. The assignment is to choose a single article from the readings on epistemology and to summarize its primary line of argument such that every point needed to establish that argument’s conclusion is included in your summary while nothing unnecessary to the argument appears in the paper. Your aim is to include in the paper all and only those claims necessary and sufficient to the argument in the article you’ve chosen to summarize.

Paper For Above instruction

This paper aims to provide a clear and concise summary of a selected article on epistemology, focusing on its primary argument and the essential claims that support its conclusion. The task involves distilling the core of the author’s reasoning into a structured narrative that captures all necessary and sufficient premises, ensuring that nothing extraneous is included. This exercise enhances understanding of epistemological debate by sharpening the ability to identify and articulate the pivotal argumentative steps.

To undertake this, the first step is selecting an appropriate article from the assigned readings on epistemology. The chosen article should present a well-defined argument pertaining to knowledge, belief, justification, or related themes. Once selected, the next step is to analyze the argument by identifying its conclusion—the main claim the author intends to establish—and then tracing backward to uncover all the premises and intermediate claims that are strictly necessary for that conclusion’s validity.

The summary should begin by stating the main conclusion of the article clearly. Following this, each premise or supporting point that contributes directly to the logical structure of the argument must be summarized. It is crucial to differentiate between claims that are essential and those that are supplementary or illustrative but not necessary for the core reasoning. The goal is to include all claims that are both necessary for the argument’s coherence and sufficient for deriving the conclusion, avoiding any tangential points or extraneous information.

Structurally, the paper should mirror the flow of the original argument, presenting premises in a logical sequence that leads to the conclusion. Care should be taken to accurately represent the author’s reasoning and to use one’s own words to articulate each claim, maintaining fidelity to the original source. This entails understanding the logical connections—such as inference, implication, and dependences—between the claims.

Given the length of 1-3 pages, the summary must be concise yet comprehensive, translating the complex argument into an accessible overview that captures the essential argumentative structure without oversimplification. This task not only demonstrates the ability to analyze philosophical texts but also to communicate complex ideas succinctly and precisely, a vital skill in philosophical writing.

Furthermore, it is beneficial to reflect briefly on the significance of the argument, perhaps highlighting how it contributes to ongoing debates within epistemology or its implications for understanding knowledge and justification. This contextualization should be brief but insightful, showing awareness of the broader philosophical conversation.

References

  • Audi, R. (2010). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge.
  • Greco, J. (2010). Putting Knowledge to Work: An Introduction to Logic and Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
  • Nagel, T. (1971). The Limits of Knowledge. The Philosophical Review, 80(2), 226-251.
  • Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.
  • BonJour, L. (1985). Epistemology: Classic Problems and New Perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Kvanvig, J. (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
  • Harman, G. (1986). The Nature of Knowledge and the Scope of Justification. In Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.
  • Turri, J. (2015). Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology. Philosophical Studies, 172(3), 725-746.
  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
  • Rescher, N. (2003). The Philosophical Foundations of Knowledge. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Related Assignments