Select The Population And Sample Focus Of The Study

Select the population and sample that is the focus of the action research project

The research project focuses on the financial crisis of 2008, specifically examining loans granted by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The target population comprises all loans issued by these institutions during that period. The sample will focus on subprime mortgages granted to low-income and unqualified borrowers, as this segment played a crucial role in igniting the financial crisis.

The research employs a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative techniques. The quantitative method will involve descriptive analysis of the data, enabling an understanding of current status and conditions related to the loans. The qualitative approach will explore causes and reasons behind the market crash by analyzing primary data, such as statistics and borrower information, to interpret the underlying factors contributing to the crisis.

Data will be gathered through questionnaires, records of loans, interviews, and document reviews. The questionnaire will collect demographic information, borrower background, and perceptions about loan services. The sample will include borrowers with subprime mortgages from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, especially those who defaulted or experienced financial distress during the crisis.

Paper For Above instruction

The 2008 financial crisis represented one of the most significant economic downturns in recent history, primarily triggered by a multitude of factors involving risky lending practices, financial instruments, and regulatory failures. Understanding this complex event requires a comprehensive analysis of the population involved in mortgage lending, particularly focusing on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that played a pivotal role in the housing bubble and subsequent collapse.

The population central to this research comprises all mortgage loans issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the period leading up to and including the crisis. This extensive population includes various types of mortgages, but particular emphasis is placed on subprime mortgages—loans granted to borrowers with poor credit histories or low income that were deemed high risk. The reason for focusing on this subset is due to its significant impact on the destabilization of the housing market, which precipitated nationwide financial instability.

The specific sample selected for this study will consist of subprime mortgages granted to low-income and unqualified borrowers. These borrowers are particularly relevant because their inability to meet repayment obligations and subsequent defaults contributed heavily to the systemic fragility. By analyzing these subprime loans, the research aims to uncover insights into lending practices, borrower characteristics, and the factors leading to loan delinquency and foreclosure, which were central to the crisis.

This research adopts a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative research techniques to provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue. The quantitative component involves descriptive statistical analysis of loan data, such as default rates, loan-to-value ratios, borrower profiles, and repayment histories. This method allows for the quantification of the scope of risky loans and the identification of patterns and correlations that contributed to the financial turmoil.

The qualitative component explores the underlying causes of risky lending and market failure through interviews, case studies, and content analysis of relevant documents. This approach will provide contextual understanding, capturing the perspectives of lenders, borrowers, and regulators. It will help in identifying systemic issues, such as lax lending standards, inadequate regulation, and the influence of financial incentives that precipitated the surge in risky lending practices.

Data collection will involve multiple instruments. Primary data will be gathered through structured questionnaires designed to extract detailed information from borrowers and lenders. These questionnaires will include demographic questions, lending process checks, borrower background, and subjective assessments of service quality. Secondary data will consist of loan records, court documents, financial reports, and market statistics, especially focusing on default rates and foreclosure proceedings during the period.

The questionnaire designed for this research will be an essential instrument, including survey items that capture demographic and background information, such as gender, income level, education, race/ethnicity, and loan details. It will also include checklist items related to the approval process, like credit scores, financial solvency, and rejections, providing insights into lending criteria. Open-ended questions will probe borrower experiences, perceptions of service quality, and suggestions for improvement.

Implementing this research will contribute to a deeper understanding of the systemic failures that precipitated the 2008 crisis. Analyzing risk factors inherent in subprime lending, borrower demographics, and institutional practices can help inform future policies and prevent recurrence. Furthermore, this study will shed light on the social and economic impacts on vulnerable populations, emphasizing the importance of fair lending practices and effective regulation.

References

• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.
• Gotham, K. F. (2013). The Right to the City: Race, Housing, and the Politics of Space. Routledge.
• Gorton, G., & Metrick, A. (2012). Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 425-451.
• Gerardi, K. S., Lehnert, A., Shapiro, R., & Willen, P. (2018). Subprime Outcomes: Risky Mortgage Lending, Homeownership, and the Current Housing Crisis. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series.
• Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2014). House of Debt: How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent It from Happening Again. University of Chicago Press.
• Thompson, K. (2014). The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Regulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 33–56.
• Partnoy, F., & Skeel, D. (2007). The Paradox of Securitization: How Securities Market Incentives Cannot Be Reconciled with Financial Stability. Washington University Law Review, 85(2), 347-388.
• Gordon, J. N. (2010). The Rise and Fall of the Subprime Mortgage Market. Harvard Business Law Review, 1, 117-141.
• Barba, A. (2009). Financial Deregulation and Bank Failures: The Case of the U.S. Savings & Loan Crisis. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 2218-2253.
• Huang, H., & Swanson, E. (2010). Analyzing the Propagation of Subprime Mortgage Guarantees: A Systemic Risk Perspective. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(12), 2755-2768.