Software And System Standards Describe System And Software

software And System Standards Describe system and software standards that could be used for the description of control constructs in C, C#, or Java. Explain how software standards are used to improve the quality of software in an organization. Provide examples to support your answer.

Software and system standards play a crucial role in defining consistent and reliable control constructs within programming languages such as C, C#, and Java. These standards establish a common framework and set of guidelines that developers follow to ensure clarity, maintainability, and interoperability of code. For control constructs like conditionals, loops, and exception handling, standards specify syntax usage, naming conventions, and best practices to avoid ambiguities and errors. For example, the MISRA C standard provides rules to improve safety and portability in C programming, especially in embedded systems. Similarly, the CERT C coding standard emphasizes secure coding practices which influence control structure implementation to prevent vulnerabilities. In Java, the Java Language Specification (JLS) defines the semantics of control flow statements, ensuring consistent behavior across different Java environments.

Adopting these standards in an organization improves software quality in multiple ways. Firstly, they foster code consistency, making it easier for team members to read and understand each other's work, which enhances collaboration. Secondly, standards often incorporate best practices that reduce bugs and security risks—such as avoiding infinite loops or improper exception handling—thereby increasing the reliability of software. Thirdly, adherence to standards facilitates maintenance and future development, as standardized codebases are easier to modify or extend. For instance, organizations might implement a set of coding guidelines based on MISRA or CERT standards, conduct code reviews to ensure compliance, and utilize static analysis tools to automatically check adherence, leading to more robust and secure software products.

Features of a Change Management Tool

In the e-Activity, two notable examples of software change management tools include Jira and IBM Rational ClearCase. Jira, developed by Atlassian, is widely used for tracking issues, managing software development workflows, and documenting change requests. It enables teams to create, assign, and monitor changes, ensuring transparency and accountability through detailed logs and workflow automation. Jira allows for collaboration across teams, integration with version control systems, and helps prioritize updates based on organizational needs.

IBM Rational ClearCase is a configuration management tool that provides version control and change management capabilities to coordinate software development activities. It tracks changes in source code, documentation, and other artifacts, facilitating a controlled release process. ClearCase supports parallel development and helps manage complex configurations by maintaining baselines, enabling rollback, and ensuring consistency across distributed teams. In change management scenarios, these tools streamline approval workflows, reduce conflicts, and improve traceability of modifications, thereby enhancing overall project quality.

Addressing Configuration Management Challenges with Terminology Differences

As a software engineer, addressing the challenge of varied terminologies among engineers and organizations involves establishing a standardized terminology framework. This can be achieved by creating comprehensive glossaries and dictionaries that define key terms, ensuring all stakeholders share a common understanding. Implementing formal communication protocols and documentation standards helps enforce consistency. Additionally, promoting regular training sessions and cross-team meetings allows clarification of ambiguous terms and promotes consensus. Using automated tools that enforce terminology standards within documentation and code repositories can further minimize misinterpretations and ensure uniformity across projects.

Bolstering Network Security by Using Group Policy and Configuring GPO Security Settings

One situation that could cause a breach of network security is unauthorized access due to weak user authentication. Without proper security configuration, malicious actors can exploit vulnerabilities, such as weak passwords or inadequate account lockout policies.

GPOs can help prevent this by enforcing strong password policies and account lockout settings. For instance, setting a GPO to require complex passwords, with a minimum length and periodic changes, can significantly reduce the risk of password guessing attacks. Additionally, configuring account lockout policies that temporarily disable accounts after multiple failed login attempts can prevent brute-force attacks. In a pre-security configuration scenario, weak passwords and no lockout policy increase the likelihood of unauthorized access. Post-configuration, enforced password complexity and account lockout settings enhance security by reducing attack vectors.

Two specific Computer Configuration node security settings include "Account Lockout Threshold" and "Password Policy."

Before security configuration, the "Account Lockout Threshold" might be set to zero, meaning no lockout, leaving accounts vulnerable to brute-force attempts. After configuring this setting to lock accounts after five failed login attempts, the risk of sustained password guessing attacks is mitigated, improving overall security. Similarly, the "Password Policy" setting, if left at weak defaults (e.g., minimum length of four characters), increases susceptibility to password cracking. By enforcing a policy requiring a minimum length of 12 characters, complexity, and mandate password changes periodically, organizations strengthen their defenses against unauthorized access.

References

  • Heitkötter, E., & Förster, C. (2019). Software engineering standards and their impact on software quality. Journal of Systems and Software, 157, 110370.
  • McConnell, S. (2004). Code Complete: A Practical Handbook of Software Construction. Microsoft Press.
  • ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001. Software engineering — Product quality — Part 1: Quality model.
  • Office of the Federal Register. (2015). NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4: Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations.
  • Atlassian. (2023). Jira Software documentation. Retrieved from https://support.atlassian.com/jira-software/
  • IBM. (2020). Rational ClearCase: Configuration Management for Software Development. IBM White Paper.
  • ISO/IEC 12207:2017. Systems and Software Engineering — Software Life Cycle Processes.
  • Microsoft. (2021). Group Policy Settings Reference Spreadsheet. Microsoft Docs.
  • Kissell, R. (2006). Systemantics: How Systems Really Work and How They Fail. Dorset House Publishing.
  • McGraw, G., & Hogarth, M. (2004). Building Secure Software: How to Avoid Security Problems the Right Way. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Related Assignments