Step 1: Complete The Table Below In Which You Will Propose T ✓ Solved

Step 1: Complete the table below in which you will propose t

Step 1: Complete the table below in which you will propose the calculations and graph(s) you will need to perform to answer your health question.

Question: Answer: What is your health (research) question? Does BMI affect the survival (follow-up status) of MI patients?

What is the corresponding null and alternative hypotheses? Null hypothesis = BMI does not affect the survival rates of MI patients. Alternative hypothesis = BMI does affect the survival rates of MI patients.

List the descriptive statistics you will compute, using which variable(s), to help answer your health question. BMI mean values of fstat=0 &1 Standard Deviation P-value of the calculations Median Value & IQR of BMI Mean Differences.

What is the name of the statistical test that you will use to test your hypothesis and answer your health question? Two paired t-test.

What is the formula for your chosen statistical test? H0 : μ = 0 HA: μ ≠ 0

Why is the statistical test you chose appropriate to answer your health question? Be sure to be clear on how the two variables you described in Milestone Two are used to complete this test. My research is interested in knowing the difference between two groups for the same subject length of follow-up for follow-up status. Using the paired T-test, I will compare the two means of the length of follow up. The formula in the paired T-tests is used to measure the mean of two populations, which in my case it is the length of follow-up with two samples in which observations in one sample can be paired with observations in the other sample (Shier, 2004).

Which graph(s) (histogram, stem and leaf, boxplot, bar graph, scatterplot) will you use to visualize the answer to your health question? Be specific and include which variables will be used and if the graph will be created for different subgroups of subjects. A boxplot for both groups (fstat=0 and fstat=1). The BMI values, Stem and Leaf, means table. This will allow me to see the sample mean, median, upper, and lower limits for each group.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction and overview. The research question—whether body mass index (BMI) influences the survival or follow-up status of patients who have experienced a myocardial infarction (MI)—aligns with a broader literature on the obesity paradox in cardiovascular disease. While higher BMI is a known risk factor for incident cardiovascular events, several large cohorts have observed that overweight and mildly obese patients with established cardiovascular disease sometimes exhibit comparable or even better survival than normal-weight peers. This paradox raises important questions about prognosis, treatment responsiveness, and the role of BMI in risk stratification after MI (Poirier et al., 2006; Lavie et al., 2009). This paper outlines a rigorous, hypothesis-driven plan to quantify descriptive statistics, specify a null and alternative hypothesis, justify the chosen statistical test, and visualize the data to address the research question with transparent methodology and interpretable outputs (Altman, 1990; Bland & Altman, 1986).

Data and variables. The core variables in this analysis are BMI (continuous, kg/m²) and follow-up status (survival or non-survival) after MI, with follow-up time measured in days. The proposed design discusses two fstat-defined groups (fstat=0 and fstat=1) to reflect two conditions or strata within the dataset, allowing a paired comparison of follow-up length across related observations for the same subjects. The descriptive statistics will be computed for BMI within each group, including mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range (IQR). The plan also calls for reporting mean differences between groups, along with p-values from appropriate tests to assess whether BMI relates to follow-up duration or survival status in a statistically meaningful way (Flegal et al., 2013; Anand & Yusuf, 1999).

Hypotheses and rationale. Null hypothesis (H0): BMI does not affect the survival rates of MI patients. Alternative hypothesis (HA): BMI affects the survival rates of MI patients. The selected test is a two paired t-test, chosen because the investigation examines mean differences in a continuous variable (BMI) across paired observations or matched subgroups with respect to follow-up duration. The paired t-test is appropriate when each subject contributes data to both conditions, thereby controlling for between-subject variability and focusing on within-subject differences (Altman, 1990; Shier, 2004). The formula for the paired t-test considers the mean of the differences, the standard deviation of the differences, and the number of pairs, testing whether the average difference is different from zero (H0: μdiff = 0; HA: μdiff ≠ 0).

Descriptive statistics and visualization. The analysis plans to compute BMI descriptive statistics for each fstat group: mean BMI, standard deviation, median, IQR, and the distribution of BMI through histograms and stem-and-leaf plots. Boxplots will be used to compare BMI by fstat group, highlighting central tendency and dispersion, as well as potential outliers. The visualization will help assess assumptions for the paired t-test (normality of difference scores) and provide intuitive visuals for stakeholders (Bland & Altman, 1986; Altman, 1990).

Graphical representations and subgroups. In addition to BMI-focused visuals, a boxplot of follow-up duration by the two fstat groups will illustrate whether there is a measurable difference in follow-up length between conditions. If the data permits, scatterplots of BMI versus follow-up days by group can reveal potential linear associations, while histograms by group can assess the shape of the distributions. If subgroups (e.g., age bands, sex, comorbidities) are available, stratified boxplots and interaction plots could reveal effect modification, informing interpretation and guiding further modeling (Rothman, Greenland, Lash, 2008).

Step 2: Rationale and interpretation plan. The justification for the calculations centers on leveraging the paired design to control for within-subject and within-pair variability, enabling a focused assessment of whether BMI differences correspond to differing follow-up outcomes. The statistics to be computed include the mean BMI per group, the standard deviation, the mean difference in BMI between paired observations, and the standard deviation and standard error of the mean difference. The p-value associated with the paired t-test will indicate whether the observed mean difference diverges meaningfully from zero at the conventional 0.05 significance level (Altman, 1990). Graphs such as boxplots and scatterplots will provide complementary information about data distribution and potential relationships, aiding in interpretation and communicating findings to non-statistical audiences (Cortes et al., 2001).

Considerations and limitations. The interpretation of any significant BMI effect on MI survival must account for potential confounders like age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, lipid profiles, treatment modalities, and time since MI onset. Although the paired design helps reduce between-subject noise, unmeasured confounding could still influence results. Sensitivity analyses, nonparametric alternatives (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank test) if normality is violated, and robust regression approaches should be considered as supplementary analyses to corroborate findings (Keller, 2013; Altman, 1990).

Conclusion. By explicitly detailing the descriptive statistics, hypotheses, testing strategy, and visualization plan, this analysis seeks to provide transparent, replicable insight into whether BMI is associated with MI patient survival or follow-up duration within a paired framework. The approach integrates established statistical practice with communicative visuals to support evidence-based conclusions and inform clinical interpretation (Lavie et al., 2009; Poirier et al., 2006).

References

  • Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and weight management. Circulation. 2006;113(24):2764-2773.
  • Lavie CJ, Arena R, Swift C, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: the obesity paradox revisited. Am J Med. 2009;122(4):315-322.
  • Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(1):71-82.
  • Kenchaiah S, Evans JC, Levy D, et al. Body mass index and risk of heart failure in men and women: The Framingham Heart Study. Lancet. 2002;355(9209):763-770.
  • Anand SS, Yusuf S, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361(9366):1772-1781.
  • Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1990.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307-310.
  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer; 2009.
  • McHugh ML. Ease of use of the Boxplot for data visualization in medical research. J Med Stat. 2011.

Related Assignments