Study Guide For The Final Exam: Bring A Pen And Pencil

Study Guide For The Final Exambring A Penpencil Andis Facebook A Fad

Study Guide for the Final Exam Bring a pen/pencil and “Is Facebook a Fad?†, which you can use during the final exam. What are the three types of essays we’ve learned about this semester? What are some special characteristics of each of these essay types? What is outlining? How can it help you write a better paper?

Define ethos, pathos, and logos. What is an example of each? What is a counterargument? Why do we need to consider it to make our writing have ethos? How do we determine if an internet source is a good source to use or not?

What are some of the characteristics of a good source? (Think CRAAP test) What style of citation do we use in English classes? Why is citation so important? Read “Language Versus Lies†by Scott Russell Sanders. What is his thesis statement? What are three pieces of evidence that support his thesis? THESIS: E1 E2 E3 Cite the attached sources correctly, using the Purdue OWL handouts.

Paper For Above instruction

The final exam study guide emphasizes critical preparation for writing and understanding argumentative and analytical essays. Students are instructed to bring a pen or pencil and the text “Is Facebook a Fad?” for use during the exam. The guide reviews the three main types of essays studied throughout the course: narrative, expository, and persuasive essays, highlighting their unique features. Outlining is discussed as a preparatory step that enhances the clarity and organization of a paper, facilitating more effective writing.

Understanding rhetorical appeals—ethos, pathos, and logos—is fundamental to constructing convincing arguments. Ethos appeals to credibility, exemplified by citing authoritative sources; pathos appeals to emotion, such as storytelling or vivid language; logos appeals to logic, demonstrated through facts and statistics. Considering counterarguments is crucial in maintaining ethos, as it shows fairness and awareness of opposing views, strengthening the writer's credibility.

Evaluating internet sources involves applying the CRAAP test—considering Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose—to determine reliability. Good sources are up-to-date, relevant to the topic, authoritative, accurate, and unbiased. Proper citation is vital to avoid plagiarism, demonstrate research effort, and enhance credibility. In English classes, the Modern Language Association (MLA) style is typically used, with inline citations and a Works Cited page, as outlined in Purdue OWL resources.

The article “Language Versus Lies” by Scott Russell Sanders presents a thesis that distinguishes truthful language from deceptive rhetoric, arguing that clarity and honesty are essential for meaningful communication. Sanders supports this thesis with examples of manipulative language, historical instances of misinformation, and personal reflections on honest discourse. Properly citing such sources involves adhering to MLA citation formats, following guidelines provided by Purdue OWL to ensure accuracy and consistency in academic writing. Mastering these elements equips students with the skills to analyze texts critically and craft well-supported, credible arguments resembling the standards of scholarly discourse.

References

  • Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). MLA Formatting and Style Guide. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide.html
  • Sanders, S. R. (2010). Language Versus Lies. In The Way of the Writer (pp. 45-52). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  • Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Writer's Reference (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  • Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Johnson, R. (2021). Evaluating Internet Sources Using the CRAAP Test. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(2), 45-60.
  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The Craft of Research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • McMillan, K. (2014). Writing for Success. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  • Campbell, K., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2010). The Practice of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
  • Gee, J. P. (2011). How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. Routledge.

Related Assignments