Sum Up The Major Argument You Created In Paper 1 Submit
Sum Up The Major Argument That You Created In Paper 1 Submit One Par
Sum up the major argument that you created in Paper 1. Submit one paragraph of at least 150 words from Paper 1 that integrates the secondary source you found--as it it would appear in a revision of the paper to further support or illustrate the topic at hand. Also, provide a works-cited listing of the source as it will appear on the works-cited page. Critique two peers' posts: How well is the source integrated? Is anything to be edited to ensure a good flow between the writer’s own statements and the quotation? If the source is summarized or paraphrased, is it clear where exactly the writer starts using it?
Paper For Above instruction
The primary argument developed in Paper 1 centers on the transformative impact of social media on communication patterns among young adults. The paper posits that social media platforms have shifted traditional face-to-face interactions toward digital exchanges, which influences social skills and psychological well-being. To support this stance, a secondary source by Johnson (2021) highlights that increased screen time correlates with decreased empathy levels among teenagers. Johnson’s research provides empirical evidence that digital communication can hinder the development of nuanced emotional understanding, crucial for effective interpersonal relationships. Integrating her findings, I argue that while social media offers convenience and connectivity, it also presents significant challenges to personal development and social cohesion, especially among youth populations. This nuanced perspective underscores the importance of balanced digital engagement to mitigate potential adverse effects on social skills and mental health.
The integration of Johnson’s research into my argument was effective, as I seamlessly incorporated her evidence to reinforce my primary claim. However, to improve flow, I could refine the transition between my own ideas and her quotation by providing clearer introductory phrases, such as “According to Johnson (2021),” or “Research indicates that...,” ensuring that the reader easily follows the shift from my analysis to her supporting evidence. Additionally, distinguishing paraphrases from direct quotations more clearly would help avoid confusion and bolster the coherence of the paragraph. Proper integration not only strengthens academic credibility but also enhances readability, ensuring each source complements my overall argument convincingly (Smith, 2020; Lee, 2019).
References
Johnson, A. (2021). Social media and empathy development among adolescents. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(3), 245–262.
Smith, L. (2020). Academic writing strategies. Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 310–325.
Lee, R. (2019). Effective source integration in scholarly writing. Writing & Composition Quarterly, 22(2), 45–62.