Summary Of The Article Titled The Use Of Task Clarification

Summary Of The Article Titled The Use Of Task Clarification And Self

Summary of the article titled "The Use of Task Clarification and Self-Monitoring to Increase Affirmative to Constructive Feedback Ratios in Supervisory Relationships."

Paper For Above instruction

The article titled "The Use of Task Clarification and Self-Monitoring to Increase Affirmative to Constructive Feedback Ratios in Supervisory Relationships" explores effective strategies for enhancing communication between supervisors and their supervisees. The primary focus is on improving the balance of positive (affirmative) and constructive (critical) feedback to foster a supportive and developmental environment. The authors argue that constructive feedback, while necessary for growth, must be balanced with affirmative feedback to maintain motivation and morale. This balance is crucial, as an overemphasis on critical feedback can lead to decreased confidence and engagement, whereas sufficient positive feedback can reinforce desired behaviors and encourage continuous improvement.

To address this issue, the article emphasizes two pivotal strategies: task clarification and self-monitoring. Task clarification involves clearly defining goals, expectations, and performance standards from the outset of the supervisory relationship. By ensuring that supervisees understand what is expected of them, supervisors can reduce misunderstandings and miscommunications that often result in unnecessary or overly critical feedback. Clear task guidance helps supervisees focus on specific behaviors or outcomes, making feedback more targeted and constructive.

Complementing task clarification, self-monitoring encourages supervisees to develop awareness of their own behaviors and progress. This strategy involves training supervisees to observe and evaluate their own performance regularly, which promotes self-reflection and accountability. When supervisees actively monitor their development, they become more receptive to feedback, as they recognize their own areas of strength and growth opportunities. This process empowers supervisees to take ownership of their learning and performance, leading to a more balanced and open feedback exchange.

The article reports on empirical findings indicating that combining task clarification with self-monitoring significantly increases the ratio of positive to constructive feedback in supervisory interactions. Supervisors who implement these strategies tend to provide more affirmative comments, which enhances supervisee motivation and confidence. Moreover, supervized individuals who engage in self-monitoring demonstrate greater self-efficacy and are more likely to seek out formative feedback proactively.

Practically, these strategies can be integrated into real-world supervisory relationships through structured training programs for supervisors, emphasizing clear communication of expectations and promoting self-assessment tools for supervisees. Supervisors can set specific, measurable goals and schedule regular check-ins to clarify tasks and progress. Simultaneously, they can teach supervisees self-monitoring techniques such as journaling, self-rating scales, or digital tracking tools. These methods foster a culture of continuous learning and constructive exchange, ultimately leading to improved performance and professional growth.

In conclusion, the article underscores the importance of clear communication and self-awareness in maintaining a productive supervisory dynamic. Task clarification ensures that both parties understand the objectives, reducing unnecessary criticisms, while self-monitoring cultivates an internal motivation for improvement. When combined, these strategies create a more positive feedback environment, which enhances professional development and promotes healthier supervisory relationships.

References

• Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on team training research. Military Psychology, 13(3), 243-252.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (2000). The corporate personality revisited. Human Relations, 53(12), 1591-1618.
• Kohli, R., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Studying feedback effects in sales organizations. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 3-18.
• McCauley, C. D., & Van Velsor, E. (2004). The Center for Creative Leadership development: Leadership development. In C. C. McCauley & E. Van Velsor (Eds.), The Center for Creative Leadership handbook of leadership development (pp. 1-22). Jossey-Bass.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Self-regulated learning: Theories, methodologies, and instructional models. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 61-83). Cambridge University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Pearson Education.