Supporting Lectures Review: The Following Lecture Healthcare

Supporting Lecturesreview The Following Lecturehealthcare Ethics St

Review the following lecture: Healthcare Ethics (Stem Cell Research) Discussion Questions. Before beginning work on this discussion forum, please review the link “ Doing Discussion Questions Right” and any specific instructions for this topic. Before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least two of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress.

Submit your responses in the Discussion Area. Introduction: Case Study Seventy-Four: Ethical Issues over DNR Orders Mr. Warden, a 93-year-old white male, is admitted to Centerville Community Hospital from Centerville Estates Nursing Home. Mr. Warden has had multiple strokes and is only partially responsive to painful stimuli. He does not recognize or respond to nursing staff, physicians, or family members. In addition, he has flexion contractures and a large infected decubitus ulcer over his left sacral area. Further evaluation shows Mr. Warden has extremely poor heart function and is in congestive heart failure. The notes from Centerville Estates Nursing Home indicate Mr. Warden has had one visitor in the past six months; that visitor was not a family member.

Tasks: Discussion Questions What are the facts in this situation? Autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice are the cornerstones of ethical decision making. What ethical dilemmas does this case illustrate? Have any principles of ethical decision making been violated in this case? What ones have been supported? How might our cultural upbringing, personal assumptions, and opinions influence our decisions as health care managers? Provide rationales for your responses.

Based on what you know from this short case; why do you think Mr. Warden’s daughter is so insistent on wanting “everything” done for her father? What if Mr. Warden was wealthy and had a large estate? Would that change your opinion of the son and his responses? Provide a rationale for your response. If the son had no power of attorney, how could this issue be resolved?

Can a physician decide to withdraw care without the consent of the family? Who has the final say in the care of a patient in this condition? Provide your reflections and personal opinions as well as your recommendations and rationale for your responses. Submission Details: To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Your initial posting should be addressed at 500–1000 words as noted in the attached PDF. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format. Respond to your classmates throughout the week. Justify your answers with examples, research, and reasoning. Follow-up posts need to be submitted by the end of the week.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Healthcare ethics present complex dilemmas that require careful consideration of fundamental principles such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The case of Mr. Warden exemplifies several ethical challenges faced by healthcare providers, patients, and families, particularly concerning end-of-life decisions, the role of surrogates, and the limits of medical intervention. This paper explores the facts of the case, identifies ethical dilemmas, evaluates decision-making principles, and offers reflections on how cultural, personal, and legal factors influence healthcare decisions.

Facts of the Case

Mr. Warden is a 93-year-old man admitted to a hospital from a nursing home after suffering multiple strokes. His condition is severe: he is partially responsive, does not recognize or respond to staff or family, and has physical complications such as flexion contractures and a significant infected decubitus ulcer. Cardiac evaluation indicates congestive heart failure, with very poor heart function. Furthermore, his social history suggests limited family interaction, with only one visitor in six months who was not a family member. These facts suggest that Mr. Warden's quality of life is severely compromised, and his prognosis is poor.

Ethical Dilemmas and Principles at Play

This case raises numerous ethical issues, notably the decision-making authority concerning life-sustaining treatment, including Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders. Respect for patient autonomy is challenged here, considering his unresponsiveness and absence of directives. The principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence also come into focus—should healthcare providers continue aggressive treatments or prioritize comfort measures? Justice considers whether resources are being used proportionally given the prognosis and quality of life, especially in cases involving elderly patients with terminal conditions.

Potential Violations and Supports of Ethical Principles

In this scenario, respecting Mr. Warden’s autonomy appears compromised due to his inability to communicate his preferences. If there was a prior advance directive, that could support respecting his wishes; otherwise, surrogate decision-making becomes necessary. The principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence support providing comfort and avoiding futile interventions that may prolong suffering. Conversely, initiating or continuing aggressive interventions without clear benefit or patient input could violate these principles, potentially causing harm and violating the ethical obligation to prevent unnecessary suffering.

Cultural and Personal Influences on Decision-Making

Healthcare managers’ cultural and personal backgrounds inevitably influence decisions. For instance, some cultures emphasize filial responsibility and family-centered decision-making, leading to insisting on "everything" being done for the patient. Personal beliefs about quality versus quantity of life also shape choices. Healthcare professionals must reflect on their biases and assumptions to ensure ethically sound, culturally competent care. Awareness of multicultural perspectives and legal standards helps in balancing respect for diverse values with ethical obligations.

Family Dynamics and Wealth Considerations

The insistent demand by Mr. Warden’s daughter for all possible interventions may stem from emotional attachment, guilt, or cultural expectations. If Mr. Warden were wealthy with a substantial estate, the family’s approach might differ, possibly influenced by concerns about inheritance, or they might seek more aggressive treatments to preserve his life for monetary reasons. Such financial considerations can complicate ethical decisions and highlight the importance of objective, law-driven guidelines regarding end-of-life care.

Legal and Ethical Resolution without Power of Attorney

If the son lacks power of attorney, resolution would involve the healthcare proxy, if designated, or a court-appointed guardian. Legally, patients’ rights to refuse treatment and the legal hierarchy for surrogate decision-makers guide these determinations. Medical providers must follow state statutes and institutional policies to ensure ethically and legally appropriate decisions in such circumstances.

Physicians’ Authority and Final Decision-Making

In cases like Mr. Warden’s, physicians can propose withdrawal of treatment based on ethical principles like futility, but cannot unilaterally decide without family consultation if legally authorized. The final decision usually rests with the healthcare proxy or legal surrogate, aligning with the patient’s known preferences or best interests. Ethical practice mandates transparency, shared decision-making, and respecting the patient’s dignity, even when incapacitated.

Personal Reflections and Recommendations

Balancing respect for autonomy with beneficence and nonmaleficence is challenging, especially in end-of-life care for incapacitated patients. Healthcare providers should prioritize clear communication, advance directives, and legal documentation to guide decisions. When such directives are absent, surrogate decision-makers must act in the patient’s best interest, considering known values and preferences. Providers should advocate for palliative care and comfort measures when appropriate to minimize suffering. Ethical decision-making requires ongoing reflection, cultural competence, and adherence to legal standards to ensure respectful, patient-centered care.

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  • Caplan, A. L., & Delbanco, T. L. (2012). Ethical dilemmas in end-of-life care. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(10), 935-939.
  • Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2010). Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. McGraw-Hill.
  • Levi, B., et al. (2014). Ethical and practical challenges of end-of-life decision-making. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 25(1), 41-50.
  • President’s Council on Bioethics. (2008). Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Oreskes, B. (2009). Ethical dilemmas in caring for patients with advanced illness. Nursing Clinics of North America, 44(2), 213-224.
  • Snyder, L., & Newton, H. (2017). Ethical issues in end-of-life decision-making. Critical Care Nurse, 37(4), 54-59.
  • Sparks, S., et al. (2010). Ethical considerations for nursing practice. Nursing Ethics, 17(2), 206-217.
  • Supino, P. (2011). Medical ethics: A review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(18), 1962-1967.
  • Wright, L., et al. (2014). Decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(11), 784-789.

Related Assignments