Techniques Of Employee Selection And Recruitment Chapter 6 I

Techniques Of Employee Selection Recruitmentchapter 6 Internal Rec

Techniques Of Employee Selection Recruitmentchapter 6 Internal Rec

Analyze the pros and cons to Asda of aiming to recruit 70% of its leaders internally. Discuss your answer.

Evaluate the extent to which a commitment to training and development is effective in helping Asda’s colleague retention.

Which mobility path (Hierarchical or Alternative) did ASDA use for Ellen Rogan? Justify your answer.

Paper For Above instruction

The internal recruitment strategy of an organization significantly influences its operational efficiency, employee morale, and long-term growth prospects. Asda’s objective of filling 70% of its leadership vacancies internally presents both advantages and challenges that must be carefully weighed. This paper discusses the potential benefits, drawbacks, and strategic implications of such a high reliance on internal recruitment, and evaluates how their commitment to training and development supports this approach, ultimately affecting colleague retention. Furthermore, the mobility path used in Ellen Rogan’s career progression is analyzed to demonstrate practical applications of mobility theories in real-world organizational contexts.

Pros of Internal Recruitment at Asda include enhanced employee motivation and loyalty, as internal candidates see tangible career development opportunities, which increase their engagement and commitment (Mathis & Jackson, 2011). Internal hiring also reduces onboarding time and costs, as existing employees are familiar with the organizational culture, policies, and procedures (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016). Additionally, internal recruitment fosters a culture of meritocracy and recognition, encouraging others to improve performance with the hope of advancement (Barber, 2013). Given Asda's emphasis on promoting from within and its significant investment in training programs like the Asda Academy, internal candidates are likely to be well-prepared for leadership roles, aligning with organizational goals.

However, relying heavily on internal recruitment has its limitations. It may result in a stagnation of new ideas if promotions happen within a closed network, potentially reducing innovation and adaptability (Keller et al., 2020). Such dependence might also lead to internal conflicts or perceptions of favoritism, especially if promotion processes lack transparency. Over time, internal recruitment can create skill gaps in other parts of the organization if lateral movements are not balanced with external hiring. Moreover, it might foster complacency among staff if growth opportunities are perceived as limited or favoritism prevalent.

The strategic balance involves integrating internal and external recruitment to ensure fresh perspectives while fostering loyalty. For Asda, the focus on internal promotion aligns with its organizational culture of development and engagement, yet must be supplemented with external recruitment to bring in innovative ideas and critical skillsets currently absent internally. The high percentage of internal promotions signifies a strong learning culture supported by robust training, which is essential in preparing employees like Ellen Rogan for diverse leadership roles.

Training and development’s role in colleague retention is both significant and multifaceted. Asda’s comprehensive programs such as the Asda Academy, apprenticeships, and leadership training initiatives directly correlate with employee satisfaction and loyalty (Noe et al., 2017). These initiatives not only enable employees to acquire relevant skills but also demonstrate organizational investment in their career growth, reinforcing a sense of value and belonging (Saks et al., 2022). Empirical studies confirm that effective training programs can lead to higher retention rates, particularly when employees perceive clear pathways for advancement (Kim & Kuo, 2017).

In Asda’s case, the commitment to in-house training and recognition initiatives like the Star program and long-service awards foster a positive work environment. Employees are motivated to stay because they see real opportunities for career development, thus reducing turnover and associated costs. However, the effectiveness depends on the quality, relevance, and accessibility of training programs, and whether leaders actively promote a culture of continuous learning (Brown & Steel, 2019).

In conclusion, a high internal recruitment target offers Asda the advantages of increased motivation, alignment with organizational culture, and reduced hiring costs but must be managed carefully to prevent stagnation and perceived unfairness. The company’s investment in training and development directly supports this strategy by ensuring that internal candidates are well-prepared and motivated to ascend to leadership roles, thereby strengthening colleague retention. The integration of continuous learning initiatives can sustain a motivated, skilled workforce aligned with organizational goals, fostering long-term success.

The mobility path of Ellen Rogan can be classified as an example of an Alternative Mobility Path. According to the concepts discussed by Schein (2010), traditional hierarchical mobility emphasizes upward movement within a linear progression of roles. In contrast, Ellen’s career reflects lateral moves across different functions—service, HR, store management—culminating in her current role, which demonstrates mobility through skill diversification rather than strict hierarchical ascent. Her movements across diverse roles exemplify the alternative mobility path, which provides employees with broader organizational experience, increases flexibility, and enhances their value to the organization.

In Asda’s context, facilitating such mobility paths aligns with their strategic emphasis on internal growth, development programs, and fostering a versatile workforce. Ellen Rogan’s career exemplifies how organizations can cultivate employee potential by providing multiple pathways—both hierarchical and alternative—supporting a dynamic talent management framework that adapts to changing business needs and employee aspirations.

References

  • Barber, A. E. (2013). Recruiting Employees. In J. R. Schermerhorn Jr. (Ed.), Managing organizational behavior (12th ed., pp. 104-125). Wiley.
  • Brown, P., & Steel, R. (2019). Employee Development and Retention. Routledge.
  • Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). Investments in employee development. Journal of HR Management, 28(1), 59-75.
  • Keller, K., et al. (2020). Innovation and Organizational Culture. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(3), 45-53.
  • Kim, S., & Kuo, T. (2017). The influence of training on employee retention. International Journal of Training and Development, 21(2), 96-113.
  • Matthis, R. L., & Jackson, R. (2011). Human resource management. Pearson.
  • Noe, R. A., et al. (2017). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Saks, A. M., et al. (2022). Employee Engagement and Retention: The Role of Training. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(1), 47-66.
  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed). Jossey-Bass.

Related Assignments