The Final Project Revolves Around You Diagnosing A Process

The Final Project Revolves Around You Diagnosing A Processstructuree

The final project involves diagnosing a process, structure, or environment within an organization that you are familiar with and that requires improvement. You will then design an organizational development (OD) intervention aimed at facilitating positive change. The organization can be your place of employment, community or volunteer groups, school committees, or governmental agencies.

Your paper must introduce the chosen organization and describe the specific process, structure, or environment that needs enhancement. Additionally, it should include an explanation of why you selected this organization, a diagnosis of the reasons why change is necessary, and a discussion of relevant organizational behavior concepts from the course text that will inform your intervention strategy.

Ensure your paper adheres to APA formatting guidelines, including 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1-inch margins, and an APA-style title and reference page.

Paper For Above instruction

The organization I have chosen for this project is my current workplace, a mid-sized marketing firm that specializes in digital advertising. Within this organization, one of the key processes requiring improvement is the communication flow between the creative team and the client relations department. Currently, there exists a disconnect where information often gets lost or misinterpreted, leading to project delays, client dissatisfaction, and decreased overall productivity. This process bottleneck not only hampers operational efficiency but also affects employee morale and client trust.

I selected this organization because I have firsthand experience with its internal dynamics and understand the tangible impact that communication breakdowns can have on organizational performance. Recognizing the significance of effective communication in organizational success motivated me to focus on this process as a critical area for improvement.

The need for change stems from observable symptoms such as frequent miscommunications, inconsistent project outcomes, and a rising backlog of unresolved client issues. Diagnostically, the root cause appears to be a lack of standardized communication protocols and insufficient use of collaborative tools that facilitate clear information exchange. Additionally, the organizational culture tends to discourage open dialogue between departments, which exacerbates misunderstandings.

Applying organizational behavior concepts from the course text, such as systems theory and communication theories, provides valuable insights for designing an intervention. Systems theory emphasizes understanding the organization as an interconnected system where changes in communication channels can ripple through different departments, affecting overall performance. Effective communication theories highlight the importance of clear messaging, active listening, and feedback loops, which are essential components for improving interdepartmental interactions.

An appropriate intervention would involve implementing structured communication protocols, such as regular cross-departmental meetings and standardized reporting formats. Additionally, adopting collaborative project management tools like Slack or Asana can enhance transparency and real-time information sharing. Training programs can also be developed to improve interpersonal communication skills and promote a culture of openness and feedback. These steps align with principles from organizational behavior, fostering a participative environment that encourages collaboration and continuous improvement.

Overall, diagnosing the communication issues within this marketing firm through a systems perspective and applying relevant organizational behavior concepts allows for a strategic approach to intervention. By improving communication processes, the organization can expect enhanced efficiency, greater employee engagement, and improved client satisfaction, ultimately leading to sustained organizational growth and success.

References

• Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization theory and design (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 343–376.
• Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Clampitt, P. G. (2019). Communicating for management (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Albrecht, K. (2010). The power of prime: How organizations can ignite extraordinary performance. Jossey-Bass.
• McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2018). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge, global reality (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (2013). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (10th ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership Fable. Jossey-Bass.