The Response Should Be In 75 Words: Transactional Leadership

The Response Should Be In 75 Wordstransactional Leadership Is A Style

Transactional leadership is a style of leadership that focuses on exchanges between leaders and followers, rewarding performance and penalizing failure (Bass, 1990). This approach emphasizes clear structures and goals, making it effective during initial organizational stages. Leaders like Tim Parker used transactional methods to turnaround companies by rewarding efficiency and punishing underperformance. Despite its harshness, transactional leadership fosters productivity and can drive immediate results before transitioning to transformational strategies.

Paper For Above instruction

Transactional leadership is a fundamental management style characterized by a clear exchange between leaders and followers, where performance is rewarded, and poor results are penalized (Bass, 1990). This leadership approach primarily emphasizes planning, organization, and task completion, making it especially effective in structured or goal-oriented environments. Leaders employ transactional methods by setting explicit expectations, providing rewards such as recognition or promotions, and enforcing disciplinary measures when targets are not met. This style is particularly valuable during the initial stages of organizational development, where stability and efficiency are priorities.

One notable example of transactional leadership in practice is Tim Parker’s leadership during the rescue of the British motoring company AA. Recognizing inefficiencies, low productivity, and high member attrition, Parker implemented strict measures—rewarding productive employees while punishing inefficiencies. His harsh but effective decisions included dismissals and restructuring, which ultimately restored the company’s stability and profitability. Such a leadership style underscores the importance of discipline, clear performance expectations, and measurable outcomes, which can result in rapid organizational turnaround.

Despite its effectiveness, transactional leadership has limitations, particularly when overused or relied upon exclusively. It tends to suppress creativity and innovation, as employees might focus solely on meeting specified targets rather than exploring new ideas. Furthermore, it can foster a transactional environment where motivation is purely extrinsic, diminishing long-term engagement and organizational loyalty. When leaders focus only on correcting mistakes and enforcing compliance, they risk demotivating staff and stifling initiative, which can hamper growth and adaptability in dynamic markets.

Transformational leadership offers a contrasting approach, emphasizing motivation, innovation, and employee development. Unlike transactional leadership, which operates within existing structures, transformational leaders inspire change by fostering a shared vision and empowering followers to transcend self-interest for the good of the organization (Bass, 1990). Jeff Bezos exemplifies transformational leadership at Amazon, having driven the company's exponential growth by inspiring innovation, encouraging risk-taking, and establishing a compelling vision that delimited traditional industry boundaries (Bass, 1994).

While transformational leadership can promote creativity and long-term growth, it may not always be appropriate in crisis situations that demand immediate results and strict compliance. Transactional leadership, with its clear expectations and rewards, is more suitable during such periods when stability and quick execution are necessary. For example, in industries with high regulation or safety concerns, transactional approaches ensure staff adhere to protocols, reducing errors and accidents (Howell & Avolio, 2005).

In conclusion, both leadership styles hold significant value depending on context. Transactional leadership excels during initial organizational phases by establishing order, discipline, and immediate results. However, integrating transformational leadership enables organizations to motivate employees, foster innovation, and adapt to changing environments. Leaders who balance these approaches can navigate complex organizational challenges, ensuring both stability and continual growth. Effective leadership must therefore be versatile, leveraging the strengths of both transactional and transformational methods as circumstances demand.

References

• Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.
• Bass, B. M. (1994). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational challenges. Harcourt Brace.
• Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 823–832.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
• David, M., & Conger, J. A. (2007). Leadership in organizations: Current practices and future prospects. Jossey-Bass.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
• Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Routledge.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education.