The Sections To Choose From Are As Follows Team Problem So

The Sections To Choose From Are As Following Team Problem Solvingyo

The sections to choose from are as following: (Team Problem Solving) You are to write a 2-3 page mini paper over your section—complete with a reference page in APA format. These are found in our LaFasto and Larson books, and your paper should be written in accordance to your section with the book. Overall, your papers should answer—does the team have (whatever section). You have to use Nashville Predators as a team example to research Team Problem Solving.

Paper For Above instruction

The Nashville Predators, an NHL team based in Nashville, Tennessee, serve as an intriguing case study for analyzing team problem solving within a professional sports context. Effective problem solving is critical to the success of any team, as it involves identifying, analyzing, and resolving issues that hinder team performance and cohesion. This paper explores how the Predators exemplify various aspects of team problem solving, drawing from the framework provided by LaFasto and Larson’s model, which emphasizes communication, leadership, mutual respect, and goal clarity.

Team problem solving begins with the recognition of issues affecting team dynamics or performance. In the case of the Predators, challenges such as injuries to key players, strategic misalignments, or communication breakdowns can hinder team effectiveness. For instance, during the 2017-2018 season, the Predators faced significant injury setbacks, necessitating rapid problem-solving to adjust team strategies, line configurations, and player roles. The ability to efficiently identify such problems and develop solutions is a hallmark of effective team problem solving.

According to LaFasto and Larson (2001), one of the key principles of successful teams is clear communication. The Nashville Predators exemplify this through their coaching staff’s emphasis on open dialogue and explicit tactical instructions. During high-pressure situations, such as playoff games, effective communication ensures that players understand their roles and can adapt quickly to evolving on-ice scenarios. For example, head coach Peter Laviolette facilitated team discussions and adjustments, which contributed to the team’s resilience and problem-solving capabilities under stress.

Moreover, leadership plays a vital role in team problem solving. The Predators’ leadership structure, including team captains and veteran players, fosters an environment conducive to problem solving by promoting trust and mutual respect. Players like Roman Josi and Ryan Johansen exhibit leadership qualities that motivate teammates to collaboratively address difficulties, whether tactical or interpersonal. Such leadership encourages a culture of continuous improvement and shared responsibility, essential for solving complex problems that inevitably arise during a demanding season.

Goal clarity is another critical component reflected in the Predators’ approach. Establishing clear, actionable goals helped the team navigate challenges efficiently. For example, their pursuit of the Stanley Cup required aligning individual and team objectives, focusing on a common goal, and adjusting strategies when faced with setbacks. The team’s ability to maintain focus on their primary objectives, even amidst adversity like injuries or tough opponents, highlights their effective problem-solving orientation.

Mutual respect and trust among team members further support problem-solving efforts by creating an environment where issues can be addressed openly without fear of conflict. The Predators’ team culture emphasizes respect and camaraderie, which fosters collaborative problem solving. When disputes or conflicts occur—such as disagreements over tactics—they are generally resolved through open discussion, with leadership guiding resolution efforts, thus maintaining team cohesion and focus.

In conclusion, the Nashville Predators demonstrate a proficient application of team problem-solving principles as outlined by LaFasto and Larson. Through effective communication, strong leadership, goal clarity, and mutual respect, the team effectively navigates challenges, adapts strategies, and maintains high performance. Their experiences affirm that successful problem solving is integral to team cohesion and success, particularly in high-stakes environments like professional hockey. This case underscores the importance of structured problem-solving frameworks in fostering resilient and adaptive teams.

References

LaFasto, F. M. J., & Larson, C. (2001). When Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team Members and Leaders Tell What It Takes to Succeed. SAGE Publications.

Kerr, R., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 374-403.

Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. Jossey-Bass.

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in team training? Military Psychology, 17(4), 229-242.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 333–375). Wiley.

Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Review Press.

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356-376.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

West, M. A. (2004). Effective Teamwork: Practical Lessons from Organizational Research. BPS Blackwell.