There Are Several Theories That Have Been Postulated Over Ti

There Are Several Theories That Have Been Postulated Over the Past 100

There are several theories that have been postulated over the past 100 years to explain crime, and these ideas have recently been applied to digital crime. These theories include choice theory, deterrence theory, psychological theories, social structure theories, social process theories, subcultural theories, and political theory. Discuss which theory is the source of motivation for the majority of computer criminals. Be sure to justify your answer. Discuss which theory would produce the most dangerous criminals and/or criminal acts.

Paper For Above instruction

Over the past century, criminological theories have evolved to explain various facets of criminal behavior, including the rise of digital crime in the modern era. Understanding which theory best explains the motivation behind computer crimes can facilitate better prevention strategies and policy formulations. Among the diverse theories, social process theories are most pertinent when analyzing the motivations of the majority of computer criminals. Conversely, social structure theories may predict the emergence of the most dangerous criminal acts. This paper explores these theories in detail to identify their applicability to digital crime and their implications for criminal behavior.

Motivation of the Majority of Computer Criminals

The predominant motivation for most computer criminals is best explained by social process theories, particularly routine activity theory and differential association theory. Routine activity theory, developed by Cohen and Felson (1979), posits that crime occurs when a motivated offender encounters a suitable target in the absence of capable guardianship. In the context of digital crime, motivated offenders are often individuals seeking financial gain, notoriety, or challenge, targeting vulnerable systems or data with minimal risk of apprehension. These offenders are usually influenced by their environment and social interactions that normalize or encourage such behavior.

Differential association theory, developed by Edwin Sutherland (1939), emphasizes the role of social interactions and learned behaviors. Many computer criminals acquire their skills and motivation through peer groups, online forums, or hacking communities, where illicit activities are normalized and even celebrated. These social environments reinforce attitudes favorable to crime, making individuals more inclined to commit digital offenses. The socialization process within these communities provides knowledge and motivation, aligning with the core ideas of social process theories as primary drivers of criminal behavior.

While choice theory suggests that individuals choose to commit crimes based on rational calculations, and deterrence theory emphasizes the threat of punishment, these are often secondary considerations in digital crimes. The immediate social context, peer influence, and habitual exposure to illicit activities tend to be more influential, rendering social process theories the most compelling explanation for the motivation of computer criminals.

Theories Leading to the Most Dangerous Criminal Acts

Regarding the production of the most dangerous criminals and criminal acts, social structure theories, such as strain theory and conflict theory, offer valuable insights. These theories focus on societal inequalities, economic disparity, and power differentials as root causes of criminality. Strain theory, introduced by Robert Merton (1938), suggests that societal pressure to achieve culturally defined goals without adequate opportunities leads individuals to resort to illegal means, including hacking or cyberterrorism, to attain success.

Conflict theory, rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, argues that social and economic inequalities create a marginalized underclass that is more prone to engaging in criminal activities—particularly acts that threaten societal stability or institutions. Cyberterrorism and large-scale hacking campaigns often emerge from politically or ideologically motivated groups aiming to challenge authority or highlight social injustices. These acts tend to be more destructive because they target critical infrastructure, financial systems, or government institutions, posing significant threats to societal well-being.

Furthermore, subcultural theories, which examine the norms and values of specific groups, may also contribute to understanding the most dangerous acts. Black hat hackers motivated by ideological beliefs or group loyalty can engage in activities that severely damage digital infrastructure. Their actions are often calculated, strategic, and designed to maximize impact, thereby constituting the most dangerous criminal acts in the cyber realm.

Conclusion

In conclusion, social process theories predominantly explain the motivations behind the majority of computer criminals, emphasizing social influence, learned behaviors, and environmental factors. Conversely, social structure theories, particularly strain and conflict theories, are more capable of explaining the emergence of highly destructive criminal acts and groups motivated by ideological or societal disparities. Recognizing these nuances is essential for developing targeted interventions and policies to combat digital crime effectively.

References

• Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608.
• Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of Criminology. J.B. Lippincott Company.
• Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
• Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy.
• Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford University Press.
• Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2018). Cybercrime and Digital Forensics: An Introduction. Routledge.
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. Penguin Books.
• Herman, E. (2012). Social control, social change and cybercrime. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 1-15.
• Wall, D. S. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Policing & Society, 17(3), 266-283.
• McGuire, M., & Dowling, S. (2013). Cyber Crime: A Review of the Literature. Routledge.