This Competency Will Allow You To Demonstrate Your Ability T ✓ Solved

This competency will allow you to demonstrate your ability to

This competency will allow you to demonstrate your ability to examine organizational changes that are due to technological changes and apply the sociological theory that would explain such change.

You have recently started working for a local department store in the Operations Department. Upon settling into your new position, you come to realize that they have outdated business practices. As a department, you and your peers begin to discuss changes that your store could make to help the store become more profitable and more competitive in the marketplace. This leads to discussions about the evolution of business practices at larger corporations such as Apple, Microsoft, Kohl's, etc.

Partway through your discussion, your Director of Operations comes in and joins the conversation. He likes what he is hearing and starts to brainstorm out loud with the group how your store can get "more with the times." Knowing that every change within an organization is made for a specific reason, your director asks that you research some of the key theoretical perspectives that would explain how and why organizations change. Because of your sociological prowess from your days in school, you know that you can apply Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interaction Theory to the reasons for organization change, but your supervisor has asked for a minimum of three theories that would support change.

In addition to conducting research on theoretical perspectives for change, your supervisor would like you to put together some sort of visual representation that demonstrates how each of the theories explains organizational change, and then highlight the one that you think is most applicable to your store. You will be presenting your visual presentation to store management in an effort to provide them information so that they can determine the avenues of change that are most appropriate for your store. Because your supervisor sees the value in the changes to the organization, he has encouraged you to create a presentation that will grab the attention of the audience and that includes both pictorial and written information so that all the audience can easily envision the application of the change to your environment.

For this presentation you are to reflect and address the following information/questions:

  • Provide a brief definition of Conflict Theory.
  • Provide a brief definition of Symbolic Interaction.
  • What changes have been made in various aspects of society (work, school, shopping, etc.)? Explain them through the lens of Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interaction Theory.
  • How do Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interaction Theory explain or impact organizational change?
  • Identify at least one other sociological theory, and demonstrate how it applies to organizational change in our society.
  • Of the three identified theories (Conflict, Symbolic Interaction, and the theory of your choice), which theory do you believe best explains organizational changes in our society? Consider various aspects of the organizations that change i.e. technology, online, and face-to-face transactions, local versus global operations, etc.

Paper For Above Instructions

Organizational changes are crucial for companies to adapt to the evolving market and technological environments. In this analysis, we will explore various sociological theories that explain organizational change, focusing on Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interaction Theory, and an additional theory: Structural Functionalism.

Conflict Theory

Conflict Theory, originating from Karl Marx, posits that society is in a state of perpetual conflict due to competition for limited resources. Organizations, as a part of society, experience this phenomenon where different stakeholders—such as employees, managers, and consumers—compete for power and resources (Coser, 1956). In the context of a department store, this theory can explain potential resistance to change among employees who may fear losing their jobs or power as new technologies and practices are implemented.

Symbolic Interaction Theory

Symbolic Interaction Theory, developed by George Herbert Mead, focuses on the subjective meanings that individuals attach to their social interactions. Changes within an organization are interpreted through symbols and interactions that shape the culture and identity of the workplace (Blumer, 1969). For instance, introducing new technology in the store can change how employees and customers interact, as they may adapt their behavior based on the new symbols (e.g., digital interfaces) present in the environment.

Changes in Society

Society has witnessed various changes across work, school, and shopping due to technological advancements and social dynamics. For example, remote working has become mainstream, influenced by changing societal norms regarding work-life balance and technological capabilities (Choudaha & Chang, 2015). In retail, e-commerce has transformed shopping behaviors, with consumers favoring online shopping due to convenience and access to diverse products. Through the lens of Conflict Theory, these changes can be viewed as battles over market share and customer loyalty among organizations, while Symbolic Interaction Theory emphasizes how customer interactions have evolved, focusing on the meanings associated with online versus traditional shopping experiences (Giddens, 2009). This analysis showcases the multilayered implications of societal changes on organizational practices.

Theories Impacting Organizational Change

Both Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interaction Theory significantly explain the factors driving organizational change. Conflict Theory highlights the competition between different groups within an organization and how their interests can create resistance to change. Conversely, Symbolic Interaction Theory emphasizes the importance of communication and the significance of shared meanings among group members during the change process. A change in management style, for instance, may be resisted by employees if they perceive it as a threat to their autonomy; however, effective communication can facilitate a smoother transition (Kotter, 1996).

Structural Functionalism

Structural Functionalism, rooted in the works of Emile Durkheim, views society as a system of interconnected parts that contribute to its stability. This theory applies to organizations by suggesting that every component must function effectively for the system to thrive (Parsons, 1951). Organizational changes, such as policy adjustments or technological upgrades, can be seen as necessary adaptations to maintain stability and efficiency within the organization's structure. In our department store scenario, implementing new practices aligns with the goals of improving profitability and competitiveness, ultimately supporting the functionality of the overall organizational system.

Determining the Most Applicable Theory

Among the three identified theories, I argue that Structural Functionalism best explains organizational changes in contemporary society. Organizations today must adapt not only to technological advancements but also to changes in societal expectations regarding ethics and sustainability. For example, moving towards a sustainable business model not only fulfills legal responsibilities but also aligns with consumer values. This multifaceted approach reflects the interconnectedness of various organizational elements and the necessity for alignment to succeed in a competitive market (Scott, 2003).

Conclusion

In conclusion, evaluating organizational change through the lenses of Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interaction Theory, and Structural Functionalism reveals the complexities involved in adapting to an ever-evolving environment. Each theory emphasizes different aspects of change, highlighting the need for organizations to manage internal dynamics and external pressures effectively. Understanding these theories will enable our department store to navigate its transformation successfully and remain competitive in the market.

References

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
  • Coser, L. A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. The Glencoe Press.
  • Choudaha, R., & Chang, L. (2015). Beyond the Numbers: The Role of Study Abroad and Growth of the Global Workforce. International Higher Education.
  • Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Free Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology. Polity Press.
  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Free Press.
  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall.
  • Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Free Press.
  • Zukin, S., & Magill, A. (2004). Whose Culture? Whose City? Ηary & Beecher Press.