This Due In 10 Hours: Watch Short Video And Answer Question

This Due In 10 Hours Watch Short Video And Answer Question P

This due in 10 hours...….. watch short video and answer question...….. psych class if you bid and I assign you will have done within 10 hours..... watch the video: and on youtube: Do you think that this was a worthwhile study? Why or why not? What did we learn from it and are there any real world examples of this simulation? No cover page needed or reference page. Half page is fine.

Paper For Above instruction

The study depicted in the short video, which appears to be the Stanford prison experiment, is a highly significant and worthwhile psychological investigation. Conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, the experiment aimed to understand the psychological effects of perceived power and authority within a simulated prison environment. Despite ethical controversies, the study remains foundational in understanding human behavior under authoritative settings. The experiment demonstrated how quickly ordinary individuals could adopt abusive or submissive roles, highlighting the powerful influence context and social roles have on behavior.

One of the key lessons from this experiment is the ease with which situational factors can override personal morals and personality traits. Participants assigned as guards became increasingly aggressive, while those in prisoner roles experienced distress and helplessness. This reactive shift illuminates how external circumstances can drastically alter human conduct, encouraging psychologists and authorities to consider environmental influences when assessing behavior. The findings are especially relevant in understanding real-world issues like abuse in institutional settings, police misconduct, and military conduct, where authority and group dynamics play significant roles.

Moreover, the experiment underscores the importance of ethical oversight in psychological research. Its revealing insights into human nature come with serious ethical concerns about participant welfare. Today, ethical guidelines like informed consent, right to withdraw, and debriefing are standard to prevent such harm. Nevertheless, the experiment’s lessons continue to inform both psychological theory and practical applications like training programs aimed at mitigating abuse of authority and recognizing situational influences on behavior.

In real life, examples such as incidents of prisoner abuse by military personnel, or the misconduct witnessed in suffragist and civil rights protests, reflect similar dynamics. The Abu Ghraib prison scandal is a stark example where guards' behavior was influenced by the environment and authority, mirroring the findings in the simulation study. These real-world instances demonstrate the relevance of the experiment's insights, emphasizing that understanding situational behavior can foster more ethical policies and interventions.

In conclusion, the Stanford prison experiment is undoubtedly worthwhile due to its profound implications for understanding human nature and authority's influence. It offers critical lessons about vulnerability to situational effects and the importance of ethical considerations in research. While controversial, its contributions help guide strategies to prevent abuse and promote ethical treatment in institutional settings, making it an enduring and valuable study in psychology.

References

- Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the “nature” of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show. PLoS Biology, 10(11), e1001409.

- Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Response to 'The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil' by Philip Zimbardo. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 205–214.

- Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House.

- Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). The power and pathology of imprisonment. Federal Probation, 37(2), 39-43.

- Carroll, K. M. (1972). The psychology of imprisonment. Scientific American, 226(4), 104-113.

- Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378.

- Jordan, J. V. (2004). Violence and the social construction of gender. Societies, 6(1), 77–92.

- Kananen, J. (2008). Ethical challenges of research with vulnerable participants. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 1-22.

- Blass, T. (1999). The Milgram paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know about obedience to authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 955-978.

- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783.