This Week When You Meet With Your Consulting Partners

This Week When You Meet With Your Consulting Partners You Want To Ev

This week, when you meet with your consulting partners, you want to evaluate the following issues: How much longer should you stay as primary consultant? You feel your effectiveness is waning because you have become too close to the group and have not addressed the connection of the board to the president. The team is becoming dependent on you. Which of the 4 change projects should the consulting group suggest helping the company design and develop? Which function can the company OD do better (as primary lead consultant) than an external group?

Generate ideas about how you can move toward making the leadership team more independent. What would you have to see happen or what evidence would you look for to see that you can terminate your relationship with the team without any damage being done? Provide your thoughts about with which projects the consulting group should be involved. You know you could help with them all, but what is ethical? How much money and time can you, as consultants, lose or make based on this decision? What should drive the decision process?

Paper For Above instruction

Effective consulting relationships hinge on balancing influence, independence, and ethical considerations, especially when guiding leadership teams through transformational change. This paper examines these dynamics, focusing on assessing the consulting role's duration, promoting leadership independence, selecting appropriate change projects, and ethical decision-making.

Firstly, recognizing when to conclude the role as primary consultant is vital. An effective indicator involves leadership independence—if the team demonstrates autonomous decision-making, problem-solving capabilities, and a clear connection between the board and the president without external facilitation, it signals readiness for the transition (Carlson & Wilmot, 2014). Additionally, diminished reliance on the consultant, as evidenced by leadership initiating and sustaining change initiatives independently, suggests the consultant's role has effectively matured and can be phased out responsibly.

Secondly, fostering leadership independence requires deliberate strategies. These include coaching, skill development, and gradually transferring responsibilities. Evidence such as leaders confidently managing challenges, delivering sustained performance improvements, and maintaining momentum without external input exemplifies progress (Ellis et al., 2016). Moreover, establishing robust communication channels between the board and the president strengthens governance structures, reducing dependencies on external advisors.

Thirdly, when selecting change projects for assistance, operational and ethical considerations are paramount. The four proposed projects should be evaluated based on their strategic importance, potential impact, resource availability, and alignment with organizational goals. It is ethically sound to prioritize projects that benefit the organization's long-term health rather than quick wins that might compromise integrity. For example, focusing on leadership development and improving governance structures might ethically justify resource allocation, whereas projects with ambiguous benefits or misaligned incentives should be avoided (Anderson & Meyer, 2018).

Furthermore, the roles of internal Organizational Development (OD) teams versus external consultants should be clearly delineated. Internal OD professionals generally possess contextual knowledge and organizational trust that outsiders lack, enabling them to build sustainable solutions more effectively and ethically (Cummings & Worley, 2014). By positioning internal teams as primary leads in certain projects, organizations develop internal capacity, reduce dependency on external consultants, and ensure continuity.

Financial and time considerations are critical in decision-making. Overextension of consulting resources across multiple projects may dilute their impact and lead to burnout, while a narrow focus might result in insufficient organizational change. The decision process should be driven by the potential for sustainable organizational benefit, alignment with strategic priorities, and readiness for change—as evidenced by leadership capacity, stakeholder engagement, and organizational culture readiness (Cameron & Green, 2015).

In conclusion, to ensure ethical and effective consulting practices, the consulting team must evaluate leadership independence, prioritize impactful projects, and balance internal versus external capabilities. The decision to continue or terminate involvement should be based on tangible leadership development, organizational capacity, and strategic alignment, always aiming to empower the organization to sustain change independently.

References

• Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools, and Techniques of Organizational Change. Kogan Page.
• Carlson, R., & Wilmot, D. (2014). The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. Crown Business.
• Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization Development and Change. Cengage Learning.
• Ellis, S., et al. (2016). Leadership Development in Organizations: Great Expectations and Little Evidence. Journal of Management Development, 35(4), 539–551.
• Anderson, D. L., & Meyer, K. (2018). Ethical Leadership and Organizational Change. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 887–899.
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT Press.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Reeves, M., & Whitaker, K. (2017). Accelerating Organizational Change: The Role of Internal Champions and External Consultants. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 133–141.
• Wheatley, M. J. (2006). Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.