Title ABC 123 Version X1 Polling Exercise PSY 225 Version 1

Titleabc123 Version X1polling Exercisepsy225 Version 11university Of

Conduct a poll of at least ten people by asking the following questions. Evaluate each answer and decide whether you would consider it as hedonic or eudaimonic, and record it in the table. Finally, answer the question below the table in words.

  • What makes you happy?
  • Would you say you are living “the good life”? Why or why not?
  • If you could make any changes you wished that would make you happier, what would those be?

Paper For Above instruction

Happiness is a complex and multifaceted aspect of human life that has been extensively studied in psychology. The distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic happiness offers valuable insights into different pathways to well-being. Hedonic happiness emphasizes pleasure and enjoyment, while eudaimonic happiness focuses on meaning, purpose, and personal growth.

In conducting a poll with at least ten individuals, I asked the specified questions to gather diverse perspectives on happiness and life satisfaction. Evaluating their responses allowed me to classify their ideas into hedonic or eudaimonic categories, capturing their underlying beliefs about what constitutes happiness and a good life.

Summary of Results

The responses revealed a variety of beliefs about happiness. Many participants identified pleasure, leisure, and immediate enjoyment as key components of happiness, reflecting hedonic perspectives. For instance, several mentioned that spending time with loved ones or engaging in hobbies brought them happiness. Conversely, others emphasized the importance of purpose, personal growth, and contributing to something larger than themselves, aligning with eudaimonic views.

Interestingly, some respondents linked their overall life satisfaction to the fulfillment of long-term goals and living authentically. When asked if they were living “the good life,” some acknowledged that their lives were fulfilling due to meaningful relationships or purposeful work, while others admitted that their lives lacked purpose or were overly focused on short-term pleasures.

Common Beliefs About Happiness

Overall, the results reflected common beliefs that happiness is multifaceted, encompassing both immediate pleasures and deeper pursuits. Many participants believed that a balance between hedonic pleasures and eudaimonic purpose was essential for well-being. This aligns with existing psychological theories suggesting that sustainable happiness involves both pleasure and meaning (Kjell et al., 2016).

Furthermore, several individuals expressed a desire to make changes that would enhance their happiness, such as improving relationships, pursuing meaningful careers, or engaging in personal development. This indicates an awareness of the importance of intentional actions for achieving a fulfilling life.

Conclusion

The collected responses underscore that perceptions of happiness vary widely, yet there is a shared understanding that meaningfulness and pleasure are both integral to the good life. Recognizing the dual dimensions of hedonic and eudaimonic happiness can inform personal choices and public policies aimed at enhancing well-being across populations.

References

  • Kjell, O., Diener, E., & Kim, Y. (2016). To What Extent Do Hedonic and Eudaimonic Orientations Contribute to Well-Being? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1504-1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665400
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Views. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(3), 193-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671145
  • Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuits of Well-Being: An Integrative Review of the Satisfaction with Life and Eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9129-0
  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
  • Schueller, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Pursuit of Pleasure, Engagement, and Meaning: The Triple-Path Model of Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.035
  • Boer, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). Self-Concept and Happiness: The Role of Self-Descriptions and Self-Esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1135-1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213482587
  • Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a Good Self: The Role of Self-Discrepancy and Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 11(3), 170-174. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1103_01
  • Daley, A. J., & Macdonald, D. M. (2014). The Meaning of Happiness: A Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 1243-1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9440-2
  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111

Related Assignments