Total Points For Each Discussion Board In Unit 8 Will Be Wor

Total Points Each Discussion Board In Unit 8 Will Be Worth 20 Pointsp

Please make sure to review this rubric carefully before participating in the weekly discussions, as this rubric may be different from ones you may have seen in previous courses. Discussions are a significant part of online learning. Consider this your "in-class time," where you can interact with your classmates and instructors to discuss what you have learned from the course materials and how it relates specifically to you. For each unit Discussion Forum, you will be graded on the following criteria:

• Main Post-Response Quality: Main post should be well elaborated and highly detailed in the discussion of required readings, demonstrating mastery of the course material, and containing new or original thought. Relevant theories, concepts, and/or research findings should be consistently incorporated to support opinion statements.
• One Reply Post-Response Quality: Reply posts should be highly detailed, thoughtful, relevant, and foster further learning and discussion of the classmate's or instructor's post. Relevant theories, concepts, and/or research findings continued to be consistently incorporated in order to support opinion statements.
• Professional Communication: Communication should be professional with no errors relative to grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.

Reminder, Unit 8 Discussion Boards close on Friday. See rubric for additional posting requirements. Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion boards in Unit 8 are crucial components of the course, designed to foster engagement and deepen understanding of human services and sociology topics. Each discussion board is weighted at 20 points, emphasizing their importance in the overall course assessment. To excel in these boards, students must focus on providing comprehensive and insightful posts that demonstrate mastery of the material, integrate relevant theories and research findings, and communicate professionally.

Specifically, the main post should be a detailed exploration of the required readings. It should go beyond surface-level summaries to include critical analysis, original thoughts, and connections to broader concepts within human services and sociology. Incorporating theories, concepts, and empirical research throughout the post supports arguments, showcases understanding, and aligns with academic expectations. For example, when discussing community intervention strategies, referencing specific theories like systems theory or social constructivism enriches the discussion and provides evidence for claims.

In addition, students are expected to respond to at least one peer’s post with a reply that is equally thoughtful and detailed. Effective reply posts engage with the original post meaningfully, adding new perspectives, asking questions, or expanding on ideas. Supporting these responses with relevant research or theoretical frameworks not only strengthens the discussion but also demonstrates critical engagement with course concepts.

Professional communication is essential. Posts should be clear, well-structured, and free of grammatical, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure errors. Maintaining a respectful and academic tone fosters a positive learning environment and reflects professionalism.

The discussion boards close on Friday, so timely participation is necessary. Students should consult the rubric carefully to understand the specific grading criteria and expectations. Adhering to these standards ensures that posts are substantive, relevant, and effectively convey understanding and critical thinking skills regarding course materials. In sum, success in the discussion boards depends on detailed, well-supported posts and responses, professional communication, and active engagement with peers and course content.

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research. Wiley.
• Sage Publications. (2010). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
• Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.