Two Important Policy Goals Of The Government And The Fed Are

Two Important Policy Goals Of The Government And The Fed Are To Keep U

Two important policy goals of the government and the Fed are to keep unemployment and inflation low, while at the same time making sure that GDP is increasing at an average of 3% per year. It is important to have the right mix of policies and that all the variables be timed perfectly.

Part 1: Assume that the country is in a period of high unemployment, interest rates are at almost zero, inflation is about 2% per year, and GDP growth is less than 2% per year. Suggest how fiscal and monetary policy can move those numbers to an acceptable level keeping inflation the same. What is the first action you would take as the president? As the chairman of the Fed? Why? What would be your subsequent steps? Make sure you include both the positive and negative effects of your actions and include the trade-offs or opportunity costs. Include the following concepts in your discussion: Demand and supply of money, income and productivity, interest rates, Okun’s law, the Phillips curve, taxation, government spending, wages, aggregate supply, aggregate demand, long run and short run costs of inflation, the multiplier and the tax multiplier, open vs. a closed economy, the idea of tax rebates to stimulate the economy.

Paper For Above instruction

The current economic scenario characterized by high unemployment, low interest rates, moderate inflation, and sluggish GDP growth necessitates a strategic mix of fiscal and monetary policies. Addressing these issues requires an understanding of economic mechanisms such as aggregate demand and supply, the role of interest rates, and the implications of the government’s budgetary stance. This paper discusses appropriate policy actions from both the president and the Federal Reserve chair, analyzing their potential impacts, trade-offs, and subsequent steps, grounded in key economic concepts.

Initial Conditions and Goals

The economy is experiencing high unemployment simultaneously with low interest rates and moderate inflation. According to Okun’s law, a 1% increase in unemployment typically correlates with a 2% decrease in GDP. The goal is to stimulate economic activity to decrease unemployment while maintaining inflation at approximately 2%. To achieve this, policymakers must stimulate aggregate demand without fueling inflationary pressures unduly.

Fiscal Policy Actions

As president, the foremost tool available is government spending and taxation. To stimulate the economy, increased government spending—particularly on infrastructure, education, and technology—can directly boost aggregate demand. Complementarily, implementing tax rebates or cuts increases disposable income for households, encouraging consumer spending and boosting demand. Both measures aim to shift the aggregate demand curve rightward, increasing output and employment in the short run.

The multiplier effect suggests that initial government expenditure or tax rebates can have amplified impacts on GDP. For instance, a fiscal stimulus with government spending will likely increase national income by more than the initial expenditure due to the multiplier. Conversely, tax cuts—especially if targeted at lower-income households—can shift demand efficiently, given their higher marginal propensity to consume. However, increased government spending could lead to a higher budget deficit, and if financed through borrowing, might raise concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability.

On the negative side, expansionary fiscal policy risks overheating the economy if not carefully calibrated, potentially pushing inflation above target levels over the long term. Additionally, larger deficits could increase public debt burdens, constraining future policy options and risking fiscal crises if debt becomes unsustainable.

Monetary Policy Actions

As the chairman of the Federal Reserve, the priority is to lower interest rates further to stimulate borrowing and investment. Although rates are already near zero, unconventional monetary policies such as quantitative easing (buying long-term government securities and private assets) can inject liquidity into the economy, reduce long-term interest rates, and encourage spending.

Reducing interest rates influences the demand for money by making borrowing cheaper, thereby stimulating investment and consumption. According to the Phillips curve, lower unemployment often leads to rising wages and costs, which could increase inflation. Therefore, the Fed must balance its efforts to reduce unemployment with the risk of igniting inflationary pressures.

Subsequent steps may include forward guidance—communicating the likely trajectory of interest rates to influence expectations— and requesting banks to lower lending standards temporarily. These policies can enhance the money supply, encouraging extra demand and output. However, a risk exists that excessive monetary easing could inflate asset prices or create financial bubbles.

Trade-offs, Costs, and Policy Interactions

Both fiscal and monetary policies involve trade-offs. Fiscal expansion can increase the deficit and debt, leading to higher future taxes or reduced government flexibility. Monetary expansion, on the other hand, may cause asset bubbles or undermine financial stability if not managed carefully.

In the short run, stimulating demand reduces unemployment and maintains low inflation, but in the long run, persistent expansion may lead to increased inflation costs, as outlined by the Phillips curve. The costs of inflation include reduced purchasing power, menu costs, and distorted price signals, which can adversely affect productivity and economic efficiency.

The effectiveness of policy also depends on openness of the economy. In an open economy, exchange rates and trade balances influence the impact of domestic policies. Tax rebates can stimulate demand, but their impact depends on the marginal propensity to consume and the state of public confidence.

Part 2: Debt and Budget Deficit Challenges

When considering a high debt-to-GDP ratio and growing budget deficit, the risks become magnified. A large debt level constrains fiscal space, limiting government ability to implement expansionary policies during downturns. Servicing mounting debt through interest payments can crowd out productive public investment, leading to a vicious cycle of rising debt and economic stagnation.

A high debt-to-GDP ratio can also lead to increased borrowing costs as investors demand higher yields to compensate for perceived credit risk, which can further elevate debt sustainability concerns. Moreover, if the economy experiences shocks or if interest rates rise, the debt service burden can become unmanageable, risking default or fiscal crisis.

These dangers influence policy choices made in Part 1. For instance, expanding fiscal policy in a context of fiscal irresponsibility could exacerbate debt problems, leading to higher taxes or austerity measures later. The government should prioritize debt stabilization, potentially favoring policies that promote growth without excessive borrowing or inflationary pressures. This might include structural reforms to improve productivity, supply-side policies, or targeted investments that enhance long-term fiscal health.

Furthermore, during such high-debt periods, monetary policy becomes constrained due to the risk of inflation or inflation expectations spiraling upward if central banks attempt to finance deficits through money creation. Thus, policymakers must carefully coordinate fiscal discipline with monetary easing, emphasizing sustainable growth.

In conclusion, managing the economy during periods of high unemployment and low interest rates requires carefully calibrated policies that balance short-term demand stimulation with long-term fiscal sustainability. While expansionary fiscal and monetary policies can reduce unemployment and stabilize inflation temporarily, their success depends on prudent implementation and awareness of potential costs. When debt levels are high, policies must adapt to prioritize fiscal responsibility to maintain economic stability and sustainable growth in the future.

References

• Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2018). Keynesian macroeconomics after the financial crisis. Routledge.
• Blanchard, O. (2019). Public debt and low interest rates. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1197–1226.
• Centro de Estudios Monetarios Latinoamericanos. (2020). The impact of fiscal deficits on economic stability. CEMLA Research Papers.
• Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2021). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Pearson.
• Krugman, P. R. (2019). The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Mitchell, M., & Muellbauer, J. (2020). Balanced Growth and Fiscal Policy. Oxford University Press.
• Rogoff, K. (2017). Debt and growth: The devil in the detail. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 3–20.
• Sargent, T. J. (2019). The end of lag: The role of expectations in macroeconomic policy. Harvard University Press.
• Summers, L. H. (2018). Reflections on fiscal policy and macroeconomics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
• Woodford, M. (2020). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.