Unit 8 In-Class Assignment: Rights And Duties
Unit 8 In Class Assignment Rights And Dutieswrite In Your Own Words
Define a Rights Ethic? What are Universal Rights? What are Inalienable Rights? What are negative Rights? What are positive Rights? Why is it important to have limitations on Rights? Define a Duties Ethic. Who do Duties serve? What is the concept of Correlativity? What does the Means Justifies the Ends mean to you?
Paper For Above instruction
The concepts of rights and duties form the backbone of ethical decision-making, especially in moral philosophy and business ethics. A rights ethic emphasizes the importance of individual rights, asserting that certain rights are fundamental and should be protected regardless of the consequences. This perspective prioritizes respecting individual freedoms and autonomy, creating a framework wherein actions are judged based on whether they infringe upon others' rights. Universal rights refer to basic rights that apply to all individuals equally, regardless of culture, nationality, or background. They are inherent and inalienable, meaning they cannot be rightfully taken away or forfeited. Examples include the right to life, freedom of speech, and pursuit of happiness. Inalienable rights are rights that individuals possess inherently, and these cannot be surrendered or transferred, such as the right to personal integrity and dignity. Negative rights are primarily freedoms that require others to abstain from interfering in an individual's actions, such as freedom of speech or property rights. Conversely, positive rights obligate others to provide certain resources or actions, like the right to education or healthcare, demanding proactive support to ensure those rights are fulfilled.
Having limitations on rights is crucial because unrestricted rights could lead to conflicts, harm, or the dominance of one individual’s interests over others. Limitations help maintain social order and protect the rights of the community and individuals. The duties ethic, on the other hand, emphasizes the responsibilities individuals have towards others and society. Duties serve everyone by establishing moral obligations that guide behavior, such as honesty, respect, beneficence, and fidelity. These duties exist to ensure ethical interactions and promote social well-being. The concept of correlativity states that every right correlates with a duty; if you have a right, there is a moral obligation for others to respect that right. For example, the right to free speech implies a duty for others to respect your expression within legal boundaries.
The phrase “the means justify the ends” suggests that the morality of an action depends on how it is achieved, not solely on the outcome. To me, it emphasizes the importance of ethical methods over merely achieving desired results, aligning with duty-based ethics where the rightness of actions is paramount. Conversely, the idea that “the ends justify the means” captures a consequentialist perspective, where outcomes determine morality, even if the methods used are questionable. These differing viewpoints influence decision-making in business and personal contexts, shaping whether rules or results take precedence in ethical considerations.
References
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
- Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
- Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.
- Terrall, R. (2015). Ethics in Business: A Critical Approach. Routledge.
- Shaw, W. H. (2016). Business Ethics: A Text and Cases (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Beauchamp, T. L. (2004). Ethical Theory and Business. Pearson.
- Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
- MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.