Week 2 Discussion: Self-Awareness And Awareness Of Others

Week 2 Discussion 1self Awareness And Awareness Of Others Please Res

Please respond to the following: In Chapter Three, there is a discussion about emotions, and how the people in the workplace are affected by cognition that can impact affect, which can in turn impact behavior. This is followed by a discussion about attitudes. Give an example of a time that someone's behavior in the workplace was not useful to the situation. Why do you think it occurred? If you were the supervisor, what could you have done differently to change the outcome? Support your position.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective self-awareness and awareness of others are essential skills in the workplace, influencing how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to various situations. Understanding one's own emotion and attitude, along with recognizing others' emotional states, can significantly impact behavioral responses and overall organizational harmony. This paper explores a real-life workplace incident where an individual's behavior was counterproductive, analyzes the underlying reasons, and discusses potential managerial strategies that could have altered the outcome for the better.

In a previous professional setting, a coworker, during a team meeting, exhibited dismissive and abrupt behavior when a colleague presented an idea. Instead of supporting or providing constructive feedback, the coworker interrupted and dismissed the proposal outright. This conduct was not only unhelpful to the collaborative process but also created a tense atmosphere, discouraging open communication and the sharing of innovative ideas. The behavior was counterproductive to the organization's goals of fostering teamwork and open dialogue.

The reasons behind such behavior can be multifaceted. One plausible explanation is that the coworker was experiencing frustration or stress related to workload or personal issues, which affected their emotional regulation. Cognitive factors, such as biases or negative attitudes towards change or new ideas, may have also influenced their response. Additionally, a lack of emotional intelligence—specifically, low awareness of how their behavior affected others—may have contributed. In some cases, workplace culture that implicitly discourages dissenting opinions can also lead to suppressive behaviors, which are often manifestations of underlying negative emotions or attitudes.

If I were the supervisor overseeing this scenario, I would adopt several strategies to address and potentially improve the situation. First, I would intervene promptly to guide the conversation toward a more respectful and constructive exchange. This involves acknowledging the disruptive behavior and reminding all team members of the importance of respectful dialogue and active listening. I would conduct a private meeting with the coworker to explore any underlying issues that might be causing stress or negativity, emphasizing empathy and understanding. Furthermore, I would encourage emotional intelligence training and facilitate team-building activities aimed at improving interpersonal relationships and self-awareness among team members.

Promoting a workplace culture that values diverse perspectives and constructive feedback can significantly reduce dismissive behaviors. As a manager, setting clear expectations regarding respectful communication and providing tools for emotional regulation can help employees develop greater self-awareness and awareness of others. Recognizing positive behaviors and reinforcing their importance through feedback and recognition can also motivate employees to engage more thoughtfully. These approaches create a more inclusive environment where employees feel valued, understood, and motivated to contribute constructively, thereby enhancing team cohesion and productivity.

In conclusion, unproductive behavior in the workplace often stems from a combination of emotional, cognitive, and environmental factors. As supervisors and leaders, cultivating emotional intelligence, fostering open communication, and setting clear behavioral expectations are essential strategies to mitigate such behaviors. By addressing the underlying causes and promoting self-awareness and empathy among employees, organizations can create a more positive and effective work environment conducive to collaboration and mutual respect.

References

• Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
• Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
• Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
• Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(Suppl), 13-25.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
• Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
• Neumann, R., & Reicher, S. (2018). Social identity theory. In K. D. Deaux & M. H. Morgan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social psychology (pp. 376-396). Oxford University Press.
• Bradberry, T., & Greaves, J. (2009). Emotional intelligence 2.0. TalentSmart.
• Cooper, R. K., & Sawaf, A. (1997). Executive EQ: Emotional intelligence in leadership. Grosset/Putnam.