Week 4 Project: Larry's Story (Motivation In The Workplace)

Week 4 Project: Larry's Story (Motivation in the workplace)

Provide a brief description of Larry's change in his work performance. Explain the concepts of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and how these may help explain Larry's motivation in his work. What would be your recommendations to Larry and his supervisor?

Paper For Above instruction

Larry's work performance has experienced a noticeable decline over the past few weeks, despite previously earning high ratings for proficiency and quality in his role as a customer service representative. Earlier, Larry exhibited enthusiasm and dedication—reflected in his proactive participation in a committee to improve customer relations, even working extra hours to ensure success. However, recent observations indicate that Larry's attention to his cases has waned, member complaints have increased, and he himself admits that his work "doesn't seem as interesting anymore." This change suggests a loss of motivation, which might be contributing to his decreased performance and growing consideration of leaving his position.

Understanding Larry's change in motivation requires exploring the concepts of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation refers to engaging in activities because they are inherently satisfying or align with personal values and interests. It is driven by internal rewards such as personal growth, enjoyment, or a sense of achievement. Conversely, extrinsic motivation involves performing activities to earn external rewards like salary, recognition, or avoiding negative consequences (Deci & Ryan, 2000).

Initially, Larry seemed motivated intrinsically; he enjoyed interacting with customers and found purpose in helping them access services, which likely contributed to his high performance and proactive attitude towards committee work. His role in creating solutions to improve customer relations probably satisfied his need for achievement and belonging, reinforcing his intrinsic motivation. However, as time went on, the decline in his interest and performance indicates a possible shift or diminution in intrinsic motivation. Perhaps the routine nature of his daily tasks, lack of ongoing challenges, or diminished recognition has caused him to rely more on extrinsic motivators, which may not be sufficient or sustainable to sustain his engagement (Gagné & Deci, 2005).

Several factors could explain Larry's waning motivation. The shift from a role that offered opportunities for meaningful contributions to routine task completion might have led to boredom or burnout. The recent increase in member complaints and his own acknowledgment that work feels less interesting could signal that his intrinsic motivators are no longer being fulfilled. Without continued recognition or new challenges, Larry’s extrinsic motivators—such as salary or job security—may seem inadequate for maintaining his enthusiasm. This mismatch can result in decreased performance, emotional disengagement, and consideration of leaving the job (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

To address these issues, recommendations should focus on re-engaging Larry by restoring or enhancing his intrinsic motivation and supplementing extrinsic incentives where appropriate. For Larry, it could be beneficial to offer opportunities for professional development, additional responsibilities that align with his interests, or participation in new projects that provide a sense of challenge and achievement. Encouraging him to share his ideas and giving him leadership roles on new initiatives might rekindle his intrinsic motivation rooted in mastery and purpose (Deci & Ryan, 2008).

For his supervisor, it is important to have an open and supportive dialogue with Larry, exploring his current feelings about work and identifying potential sources of dissatisfaction or boredom. Recognizing his past contributions and explicitly acknowledging his efforts could reinforce his sense of competence and belonging. Furthermore, implementing recognition programs or providing meaningful feedback can help sustain extrinsic motivation. When possible, tailoring tasks to match Larry’s interests and strengths or offering flexible work arrangements might also invigorate his engagement with their work (Pink, 2009).

In conclusion, Larry’s decline in performance appears to be linked to a reduction in intrinsic motivation, possibly compounded by insufficient extrinsic reinforcement. Restoring his enthusiasm involves creating a work environment that fosters ongoing challenge, recognition, and personal relevance. For managers, understanding the balance between intrinsic and extrinsic motivators is crucial in retaining skilled employees and maintaining high performance levels. Addressing these motivational factors proactively can help Larry rediscover purpose and satisfaction in his work, ultimately benefiting both him and the organization.

References

• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
• Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
• Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068.
• Lepper, M. R., Green, D., & Nisbett, R. (1973). Undermining of children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A teacher observation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
• Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611.