Week 4 Project: Leadership Styles Select A Well-Known Person
Week 4 Project Leadership Stylesselect A Well Known Personalityjudge
Week 4 Project: Leadership Style Select a well-known personality—judge, lawyer, correctional administrator, or police chief—in criminal justice and talk about this person’s leadership style in relation to the leadership theories discussed in your book. Answer the following questions in a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation: Which of the following theories is most suitable for describing this leader’s behavior? Situational leadership Multiple linkage model Cognitive resource theory Support your choice with reasons and explain why the other theories are not suitable. How can the leadership substitute’s theory be applied to explain the situational variables for this leader? Do you think the path-goal theory explains the strategies of influence used by this leader? Why? Did this leader receive too much credit for the agency’s success, or do you believe that he or she could have been successful despite the subordinates? Why?
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Leadership within the criminal justice system is diverse and complex, involving individuals who demonstrate unique styles shaped by various theories. This paper explores the leadership style of a prominent criminal justice figure, specifically a police chief, by analyzing their approach through the lens of established leadership theories. The primary focus is on identifying which theory best explains their behavior, evaluating the applicability of leadership substitutes, and examining the influence strategies per the path-goal theory. Additionally, the discussion considers whether the leader's success was primarily due to their own qualities or the subordinate team.
Selection of a Well-Known Personality
For this analysis, I have selected Chief William Bratton, a renowned police executive known for his leadership in multiple major cities including New York and Los Angeles. Bratton's innovative strategies and management style have significantly impacted law enforcement practices, making him an ideal candidate for this study.
Most Suitable Leadership Theory
Among the examined theories—Situational Leadership, Multiple Linkage Model, and Cognitive Resource Theory—the most suitable to describe Bratton’s behavior is the Multiple Linkage Model. This theory emphasizes the interconnectedness of various organizational factors, including environmental influences, leader-member relationships, and task structure, aligning closely with Bratton's adaptive leadership style.
While Situational Leadership offers valuable insights, it primarily focuses on adjusting leadership style based on subordinate readiness, which does not fully capture Bratton's proactive, strategic approach. Cognitive Resource Theory, which centers on stress and intelligence as determinants of leadership effectiveness, is less applicable as Bratton’s success seems rooted in systemic and organizational factors rather than individual cognitive capabilities.
Application of Leadership Substitutes Theory
The leadership substitutes theory suggests that certain organizational and task characteristics can diminish the leader's influence. In Bratton's case, his proactive policies, technological innovations like CompStat, and community policing strategies served as substitutes that reduced the need for directive leadership. These variables created an environment where subordinate initiative and motivation were driven by the organizational structures and resources, aligning with the theory.
Path-Goal Theory and Leadership Strategies
The path-goal theory, which posits that leaders influence subordinate motivation by shaping the work environment and clarifying paths to goals, aptly explains Bratton’s influence strategies. His focus on setting clear objectives, providing resources, and adapting leadership style to subordinate needs—whether through supportive, participative, or achievement-oriented behaviors—demonstrates this theory in action. Bratton’s use of data-driven policing and community engagement exemplifies the strategic influence promoted by the path-goal model.
Success and Attribution
Regarding the attribution of success, Bratton appears to have received a significant portion of credit for the improvements in crime rates and community relations. However, it is plausible that his success was also due to capable subordinates and organizational structures that supported innovative policies. His ability to motivate and guide his team was instrumental, but without the subordinate cooperation, such achievements might not have been possible. Therefore, the success stems from a combination of effective leadership and subordinate effort.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Chief William Bratton exemplifies a leadership style best understood through the Multiple Linkage Model, supported by his strategic use of substitutes and influence tactics aligned with the path-goal theory. His success highlights the importance of adaptive, data-driven leadership in complex organizational settings like law enforcement. While he received considerable recognition, the collaborative effort of his team was also vital, illustrating that leadership effectiveness is often a shared success.
References
- Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
- Hershey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice Hall.
- House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321-339.
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Leadership effectiveness and subordinate influence in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 125-134.
- Lippitt, G., & White, R. K. (1943). Autocracy and democracy: A study of leadership and participation. Harvard University Press.
- Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. Harper & Row.
- Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of transformational leadership: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 20-47.
- Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Zaleznik, A. (1977). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review, 55(3), 67-78.