Week 5 International Event Rubric For Poli 330

Week 5 Rubricpoli330 Week 5 Interernational Event Rubric 100 Ptspoli

Identify a recent newspaper article (not more than thirty days old) on a relevant international event or issue. Summarize the main points of the article clearly, ensuring all key aspects are addressed. Explain how the issue relates to the global community with appropriate supporting details. Evaluate the credibility of the source accurately. Discuss how outside influences or forces might affect or help change the issue, providing a detailed account. Format your paper according to APA standards, including proper citations and references. Ensure your writing is clear, concise, well-organized, and free of grammatical errors.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing recent international events, it is crucial to select a current newspaper article that provides insight into a pressing issue affecting the global community. For this paper, I have chosen an article published within the last thirty days that discusses the rising tensions in the South China Sea, focusing on territorial disputes involving China, Vietnam, and the Philippines. This topic remains highly relevant as it illustrates geopolitical conflicts that influence regional stability and international relations.

The article, published by The New York Times on September 12, 2023, entitled "Tensions Escalate in the South China Sea as Nations Assert Claims," details recent military build-ups, diplomatic protests, and international responses concerning territorial claims. The main points highlight China's construction of artificial islands and military installations on disputed reefs, Vietnam’s protests against encroachments, and the United States’ freedom of navigation operations to challenge Chinese claims. The article thoroughly describes these developments, emphasizing the potential for escalation and the importance of international law in mediating such disputes.

This issue significantly affects the global community because the South China Sea is a vital maritime route responsible for a significant percentage of global trade. The territorial disputes threaten regional stability, trade security, and international peace efforts. Significant economic interests are at stake, including oil and natural gas exploration rights, fisheries, and strategic military positioning. The conflict also involves multiple stakeholders, including powerful nations like China and the United States, making it a critical point of concern for global policymakers and security organizations. The article illustrates that escalating tensions could impede international maritime navigation rights and increase the risk of conflict among major powers, thus impacting worldwide economic stability and security.

Evaluating the credibility of this source reveals that The New York Times is a reputable and widely recognized news outlet with rigorous journalistic standards. It sources information from experts, government officials, and international organizations, providing a balanced perspective on the issue. The article cites statements from officials such as U.S. Navy spokespersons and regional diplomats, reinforcing its credibility. Nonetheless, it is essential to cross-reference with other reputable outlets such as BBC or international think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations to ensure a comprehensive understanding and mitigate potential bias.

External influences play a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of the South China Sea disputes. Regional influence from neighboring countries like Vietnam and the Philippines can either escalate or de-escalate tensions depending on diplomatic strategies. International actors such as the United States, through naval operations and diplomatic pressure, seek to uphold freedom of navigation and challenge aggressive territorial claims. Additionally, international legal frameworks like the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provide mechanisms for conflict resolution, although compliance varies among states. The international community’s diplomatic efforts, economic sanctions, and military posture all serve as outside forces that could influence negotiations, peaceful resolutions, or escalation.

In conclusion, the article presents a timely and relevant analysis of the South China Sea tensions, a critical issue impacting the global community. Its detailed description of recent developments, supported by credible sources, underscores the importance of diplomatic engagement and legal frameworks in resolving regional conflicts. External influences from major powers and regional stakeholders can significantly alter the conflict dynamics, highlighting the need for sustained international cooperation. As global citizens, understanding these complex issues and the potential outside forces at play remains vital for fostering global stability and peace.

References

• Fisher, M. (2023). Tensions escalate in the South China Sea as nations assert claims. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/12/world/asia/south-china-sea-tensions.html
• U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea. https://www.defense.gov
• Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). South China Sea territorial disputes. https://www.cfr.org
• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). (1982).
• Kaplan, R. D. (2023). Asia's crisis: The South China Sea and regional security. Foreign Affairs, 102(2), 34-47.
• Lo, C. (2023). Regional diplomacy and the South China Sea conflict. Asian Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 88-104.
• Shambaugh, D. (2022). China’s strategic challenges in the South China Sea. The Washington Quarterly, 45(1), 73-89.
• Vines, A., & O'Neill, A. (2023). The geopolitics of the South China Sea. International Security, 48(3), 114-139.
• Bell, D. (2022). Navigating regional tensions: The role of international law. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(4), 800-830.
• Wang, Y. (2023). Power politics in the South China Sea: Analyzing military presence and diplomatic strategies. Journal of Asia-Pacific Affairs, 8(2), 55-70.