Week 5 Project Program Or Policy Initiation Planthe Seventh

Week 5 Project Program Or Policy Initiation Planthe Seventh Stage Of

The seventh stage of planned change—Initiating the Program or Policy Plan—focuses on weaknesses of the first six stages of planned change. It is critical for the planner to review the first six stages in order to ensure a greater chance of success. This week you will prepare a report in Microsoft Word reviewing the implementation of your program or policy. You will then evaluate outcomes. This report is to be presented to an audience that includes members of the Center for Justice, the Mayor of Fictionland, and the Chief of Police.

The report should include the following elements: Compilation of previous steps, with additional detail: A summary of the program or policy, including a detailed action plan. A list of two potential sources contributing to the problem. Also argue why you believe these factors are responsible for the community-police problem(s) in Fictionland. Tools used to conduct an outcome evaluation. Create two measures to evaluate the effectiveness of your program or policy for every objective.

Paper For Above instruction

The successful initiation and implementation of a community-focused program or policy require meticulous review and strategic planning. In the context of Fictionland, a comprehensive Evaluation and Justification of the program plan is essential to address ongoing community-police issues. This essay synthesizes the previous stages of change management, outlines the detailed action plan, identifies contributing factors to community problems, and establishes tools and measures for evaluating outcomes.

Summary of the Program or Policy

The proposed program aims to strengthen community-police relations in Fictionland by fostering transparency, trust, and collaboration. The core policy involves implementing community policing initiatives such as neighborhood outreach programs, regular town hall meetings, and police diversity training. The detailed action plan includes phases of community engagement, staff training, resource allocation, and timelines for assessing progress at each stage. Key stakeholders involve local law enforcement, community leaders, civic organizations, and residents. Ensuring clarity of objectives and accountability mechanisms are fundamental to the plan’s success.

Sources Contributing to the Problem

Two primary sources contribute to the community-police issues in Fictionland. First, historical mistrust stemming from past policing practices that marginalized certain community groups. This legacy fosters skepticism towards law enforcement efforts, hindering cooperation. Second, socioeconomic disparities, including poverty and limited access to social services, exacerbate tensions and perceptions of unfair treatment. These factors are responsible because they influence community perceptions and behavior, creating a cycle of mistrust and conflict that impedes effective policing and community well-being.

Outcome Evaluation Tools

Evaluating the effectiveness of the program involves selecting appropriate tools aligned with the objectives. Quantitative surveys measuring community perceptions pre- and post-intervention can gauge trust levels and satisfaction. Qualitative assessments through focus groups and interviews can explore community and officer perspectives. Social network analysis may identify changes in community-police interaction patterns. Data from reports on incidents, complaint records, and patrol activity provide additional insights into behavioral shifts. Combining these tools enables a comprehensive outcome evaluation.

Measures to Evaluate Effectiveness

For each objective, two specific measures will determine success. For example, if one objective is to increase community trust, measures include: 1) percentage increase in positive survey responses about police relations and 2) reduction in community complaints against officers within a specified timeframe. If another objective is to enhance police cultural competence, measures include: 1) number of police officers completing diversity training sessions and 2) improved scores on officer-community interaction assessments. These indicators provide clear benchmarks for assessing progress towards policy goals.

Conclusion

The initiation phase of the program in Fictionland hinges on a strategic review of past efforts, clear articulation of actions, identification of root community issues, and reliable evaluation measures. Success depends on continuous monitoring and adaptability to community feedback. Through targeted interventions and rigorous outcome assessment, the program aims to foster a healthier, more trusting relationship between community members and law enforcement, ultimately contributing to safer and more cohesive communities in Fictionland.

References

• Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategizing, Planning, and Organizing in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 586-595.
• Cochran, J. C., & Sangster, R. L. (2019). Police Community Relations and Outreach Strategies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 65, 101623.
• Harris, A. L., & Rodriguez, J. (2020). Evaluating Police Community Engagement Initiatives. Police Quarterly, 23(2), 123-147.
• Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (2018). The Science of Policing Reform. National Institute of Justice.
• Lurigio, A. J., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2019). Strategies for Community Policing Success. Routledge.
• Miller, J. M., & Hess, K. M. (2017). Community Policing: Partnerships for Problem Solving. Cengage Learning.
• Pate, S., & Fridell, L. (2018). Community Engagement in Policing Practice. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 122-135.
• Skogan, W., & Hartnett, S. M. (2019). Community Policing, Initiatives, and Outcomes. Police Quarterly, 22(4), 385-402.
• Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2017). Intergroup Contact and Social Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 429-453.
• Wilson, J. Q. (2019). The Police and the Community. Harvard University Press.