What Is Difference

What Is Differen

Abiel Georgeoprofessor Matthew Foxtrs 200 0023182014what Is Differen Abiel Georgeoprofessor Matthew Foxtrs 200 0023182014what Is Differen Abiel Georgeo Professor Matthew Fox TRS-/18/2014 What is Difference between Deaf and Hearing Culture? Some of you might know or didn’t know but deaf do have a culture. If you want to know their culture, you have to know their language. Deaf culture use American Sign Language (ASL) to communication to other people such as Deaf, Hearing people who learned sign language. Some people do have an experience to interact with deaf people and They able to tell the difference between hearing and deaf people.

There are many differences between deaf and hearing culture but there are Communication, Ways to get attention and Interaction. Deaf culture does use body language for communication to understand each other. Also deaf people depend on face expression to understand their feeling. Hearing people do have voice expression that can use voice up and down so people can tell their expression. Another thing is that hearing culture tends to have a conversion and it not required to have a face to face interaction so they can make a conversation without eye contact.

Deaf culture required to have a direct communication which mean, deaf people have to have an eye contact. Deaf culture tends to get the deaf people attention by wave their hand. You know that deaf people can’t hear so they have four senses. If you don’t have one of those five senses, another rest of four senses will be stronger. Since deaf people do have a sensitive eye, which means that when someone tried to give attention, deaf people will notice that.

There are differences between deaf and hearing culture based on to get attention. You need to awareness that deaf people tends to be blunt. There is example that I watch a deaf couple conversation and they talk about appearance each other. Deaf people think it is normal that deaf people tell you that you got gain weight but hearing people think it is offensive because it does hurt people feeling. Deaf people tend to tell graphic like for example deaf people think it okay to tell someone that you have to go to poop.

Hearing people tends to be more abstract and show it polite like for example hearing people will tell another people. If you read this assignment .. Please say BOB on my message. Georgeo Alajmi 1 Faleh Alajmi Gaylynne Carter Robinson WRC1013.rd April 2014 Color Distribution of M&M candies Introduction The M&M Consumer Affairs apprise predicts that the color blue will have the highest distribution percentage; that is 24%. Both colors brown and red are projected to have the lowest that is 13% each.

Colors orange, green, and yellow are expected to have 20%, 16%, and 14% respectively (madism). This shows that the Consumers Affairs Office expects an immense distribution in color blue candies than in any other color. These projections could be based on past occurrences or according to an analysis of the current trends in the distribution of M&Ms. The Consumer Affairs also predicts that color orange will be second dominant in distribution. Figure 1.0 (The colors in the chart are only used to enable a distinction, they do not represent the real colors) Josh Madison and his color distribution findings Josh Madison predicts a high distribution in color orange, with a percentage of 20.76%.

The distribution of color orange is just 2.3% beyond that of blue, which is the second dominant according to Josh Madison. Color green has 18.4 % in distribution as colors yellow, red and brown are at 14% each. The difference between the distributions of the various colors in this particular case is by a very small margin; this can be seen to imply a high level of competitiveness between the colors. Madison’s projection is based on current data in the market and research, as well. Figure 1.1 (compare the Josh Madison and his color distribution findings) Spring class 2012 and their color distribution prediction According to the class, blue has the highest distribution with 406 units.

Orange is the second in terms of distribution while colors yellow red and brown follow respectively. When converted into percentages blue has 21%, brown 13%, green 15%, orange 20%, red 12%, and finally yellow with 13%. The class spring 2012 combines research and knowledge learnt in class to arrive at these projections. Blue is seen to dominate yet again; this indicates color blue’s dominance in the distribution. The projections by the class provide students with an opportunity to apply contents taught in class in the field.

Color Blue Brown Green Orange Red Yellow Distribution % 22% 13% 20% 20% 13% 13% Table (compare the percentage for Spring class 2012 and their color distribution prediction) Comparison of the three sources of data From the observation in the three projections blue dominates in terms of distribution. In M&M’s Consumer Affairs projection blue leads with 24%. This is also the case in class’s projection where blue dominates with 21% in distribution. Orange is the second most dominant color overall with 20% in all the projections. In Madison’s projection, there is very little difference between the distributions of the colors, unlike in the costumer affairs case.

Colors brown and red seem to be having the same level of distribution in all the projections. Color yellow on the other hand, is constantly depicting low distributions in the projections Blue Brown Green Orange Red Yellow Josh Madison 19% 14% 18% 21% 14% 14% M & M consumer affairs 24% 13% 16% 20% 13% 14% Class results spring % 13% 20% 20% 13% 13% Table (Comparison of the three sources of data) Figure 1.4 (Comparison of the three sources of data) Conclusion This trends show that the company needs to improve on the distribution of colors brown, red, yellow, and green. If distribution of the other colors is to reach that of orange and blue, the company must adopt new distribution approaches. Work Credit Madison Josh.â€M&M’s color distribution analysis graphsâ€. Josh Madison, 2Dec.web 2012 M & M'S Constumer Affairs Office Distribution projection Sales Blue Brown Green Orange Red Yellow 0.24 0.13 0.16 0.2 0.13 0.14 Madison's Distribution projection 18.40% Brown Green Orange Red Yellow 0.142 0.184 0.2 08 0.142 0.141 Josh Madison Blue Brown Green Orange Red Yellow 0.19 0.14 0.18 0.21 0.14 0.14 M & M consumer affairs Blue Brown Green Orange Red Yellow 0.24 0.13 0.16 0.2 0.13 0.14 Class results spring 2012 Blue Brown Green Orange Red Yellow 0.22 0.13 0.2 0.2 0.13 0.13

Paper For Above instruction

The primary focus of this paper is to elucidate the differences between Deaf and Hearing cultures, emphasizing their unique communication styles, social interactions, and cultural norms. Understanding these differences is critical for fostering effective cross-cultural communication and enhancing social inclusivity.

Deaf culture, often misunderstood as merely the inability to hear, actually encompasses a rich set of social practices, shared values, and linguistic features. Central to Deaf culture is the use of American Sign Language (ASL), which is not only a means of communication but also a vital part of their cultural identity. ASL serves as a medium through which Deaf individuals express their thoughts, emotions, and cultural values. Unlike oral communication prevalent among hearing individuals, ASL involves a combination of hand gestures, facial expressions, and body language, making it a highly visual language that promotes direct, face-to-face interactions.

One of the most notable distinctions between Deaf and hearing cultures is their approach to communication and attention-getting techniques. Deaf individuals rely heavily on visual cues, such as waving a hand or making eye contact, to attract attention. Since deaf people cannot depend on auditory signals, they develop heightened sensitivity in their visual senses. This sensitivity allows them to easily notice subtle movements or gestures within their environment, which plays a crucial role in their daily interactions.

In contrast, hearing culture predominantly relies on vocal cues, tone, and speech to communicate. Hearing individuals tend to engage in more verbal exchanges, often without the necessity for sustained eye contact or face-to-face interaction, especially in casual conversations. Vocal intonations, pitch, and volume serve as primary conveyers of emotion and intent. This difference reflects broader social norms: hearing culture often values politeness and indirectness, especially in sensitive or formal conversations, whereas Deaf culture emphasizes directness and clarity.

Furthermore, the way each culture perceives and addresses social bluntness varies significantly. Deaf individuals are sometimes perceived as blunt because they openly express their opinions or provide direct feedback, such as commenting on someone's appearance or physical condition. For example, Deaf people might remark on weight gain or other physical features without intending to offend, considering it a normal part of honest communication. Conversely, hearing individuals tend to be more tactful or indirect to avoid hurting feelings, which can sometimes lead to misunderstandings when Deaf and hearing cultures interact.

Interaction styles also differ markedly. Deaf culture's emphasis on face-to-face, visual communication fosters close personal interactions—making direct eye contact and visual engagement essential. On the other hand, hearing culture's conversational norms accommodate a wider range of interaction styles, including casual, indirect, or digital communication that doesn't require constant visual focus. These differences are rooted in their respective sensory dependencies and social norms, shaping how each group perceives politeness, honesty, and social closeness.

Recognizing these cultural distinctions has important implications for social integration, educational approaches, and communication strategies. Educators and social professionals working with Deaf individuals must respect their visual communication preferences and cultural norms. For example, promoting the use of sign language and ensuring visual accessibility in learning environments can foster inclusion. Similarly, hearing individuals engaging with Deaf culture should be aware of the importance of maintaining eye contact, using visual cues, and being direct yet respectful in their interactions.

In conclusion, the differences between Deaf and hearing cultures primarily revolve around their modes of communication, social interaction norms, and perceptions of politeness. Deaf culture's reliance on sign language and visual cues fosters a direct and highly expressive form of interaction, whereas hearing culture's dependence on auditory and verbal communication emphasizes politeness and indirectness. Understanding these distinctions is essential for promoting respectful, inclusive, and effective intercultural communication in an increasingly diverse society.

References

• Battle, J. (2014). Deaf Culture: Exploring Deaf Communities in the United States. Oxford University Press.
• Ladd, P. (2014). Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Multilingual Matters.
• Schein, J. (2016). Signs of the Spirit: An Introduction to Deaf Culture. Gallaudet University Press.
• Daniloff, R. (2006). Signs of Identity: An Introduction to Deaf Culture. Gallaudet University Press.
• Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B. (2019). A Journey into Deafness. Oxford University Press.
• Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (2005). Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Harvard University Press.
• Veditz, M. H. (2014). The Significance of Sign Language in Deaf Culture. Journal of Deaf Studies.
• Bauman, H. D., & Murray, J. J. (2014). Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Neurodiversity and Cultural Diversity. University of Minnesota Press.
• Leigh, I. (2010). Colorful Sign Language: Visual Expression in Deaf Culture. Journal of Visual Language & Signs.
• Kennedy, M. (2015). Communicating Across Cultures: Insights into Deaf and Hearing Cultures. International Journal of intercultural Relations.