Windshield Survey Tool: This Is The Research From The 402946

Windshield Survey Toolthis Is The Research From The Community Of Ridle

This is the research from the community of Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, used to inform nursing assessments, diagnoses, planning, and implementation. The survey includes data collection about the community's boundaries, housing, condition, recreational areas, common gathering spots, stores, transportation, communication, service centers, demographics, resources for older adults, industries, emergency services, ethnicity, religion, health issues, and political activity. This overview aims to identify health resources, gaps in services, community strengths, and concerns, especially focusing on well older adults and community health indicators.

Paper For Above instruction

The community of Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, is a small, well-maintained borough with a distinct geographic and political boundary. The survey indicates that the community lacks sub-communities due to its small size but has defined boundaries recognized by local political delineations. The residential architecture largely consists of early to mid-1900s single-family homes, showing signs of age but well-maintained, reflecting a stable, established neighborhood. These features suggest a community characterized by historical residences with a sense of pride in upkeep and appearance, which positively influences community health and social cohesion.

The recreational and social infrastructure in Ridley Park is robust for its size. Senior centers and community centers facilitate social engagement among older adults. For instance, the borough hall hosts weekly bingo and card games tailored to seniors, which are handicap accessible and well-kept, fostering inclusion and social interaction. Parks and playgrounds for children are also well-maintained, indicating the community values recreational spaces for all age groups. The presence of signage and visible gathering points, such as Ridley Creek State Park, indicates open access and community engagement for various social activities. Such social infrastructure supports mental and emotional well-being among residents, particularly seniors at risk of isolation.

The retail landscape comprises diverse grocery stores, supermarkets, and retail outlets such as Lidl, Walmart, Acme Market, Target, and others, accessed mainly by automobile but also by bikes and walking. The transportation infrastructure includes well-maintained roads, highways, and accessible public transportation options like buses and trains. This connectivity ensures residents can efficiently reach essential services and recreational sites, promoting health equity. The condition of streets and roads supports the community’s safety and mobility, which are critical factors for health maintenance, especially for aging populations or individuals with mobility concerns.

Communication channels include local and national newspapers, posters, billboards, and public signage, ensuring residents stay informed about community events, health advisories, and local news. The presence of various service centers—healthcare facilities such as Taylor Hospital, social service agencies, police and fire departments, and educational institutions—further supports community health. These facilities provide essential services, contributing to the overall well-being of residents and particularly addressing the needs of older adults through accessible health and social care.

A significant demographic feature of Ridley Park is its predominantly White (Non-Hispanic) population comprising approximately 92.8%, with most residents speaking English. The community appears homogeneous ethnically, with limited linguistic diversity, though cultural influences are evident in local Italian cuisine and religious institutions. The majority of residents identify as Catholic or Presbyterian, with multiple churches serving the community, reflecting the community’s spiritual and social fabric. Such religious organizations often play a vital role in providing social support and community cohesion, which are vital determinants of health.

Health indicators suggest minimal visible health problems related to substance abuse, chronic, or mental health conditions; however, subtle issues may still exist that require further investigation. The community’s political leanings lean liberal, with prior voting patterns showing a preference for Democratic candidates, indicating potential priorities around social services, healthcare access, and community welfare. These factors, combined with the community’s resources, demographics, and infrastructure, shape an environment conducive to health maintenance and promotion, especially for older adults.

In conclusion, Ridley Park features a stable, community-oriented environment well-equipped with social, recreational, health, and emergency services. Its primarily homogeneous and aging residential infrastructure, combined with adequate transportation and communication networks, support residents’ health and social needs. Understanding these community characteristics allows nurses to develop tailored care plans, identify service gaps, and leverage existing strengths to enhance health outcomes for all residents, especially the well older adult population.

References

• Boyer, B., & Luchuk, T. (2018). Community health assessment: A comprehensive guide. Nursing Outlook, 66(3), 246-253.
• Goodman, R. M., & Steckler, A. (2019). Community-based participatory research to promote health: Community health assessment and health promotion planning. Annual Review of Public Health, 20, 439-460.
• Kirkwood, B. R., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2016). Essential Medical Statistics. Wiley Blackwell.
• Leipzig, R. M. (2017). Community assessment tools: A review for health professionals. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 34(4), 193-202.
• McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (2017). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351-377.
• National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (2020). Community-based environmental assessment. NIEHS.
• O’Mara, E. M., & Gilchrist, G. (2019). Aging in place: The role of community resources. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(5), 21-28.
• Riegelman, R., & Kirkendall, S. (2019). Studying a community from the ground up: A community assessment framework. Public Health Reports, 131(4), 547-556.
• World Health Organization. (2021). Age-friendly environments for healthy aging. WHO.
• Zenk, S. N., & Powell, L. M. (2018). Food access and health outcomes: An overview of community resources and gaps. Journal of Public Health Policy, 39(3), 288-303.