You Will Write The Literature Review For Your Research Propo

You Will Write The Literature Review For Your Research Proposal This W

You will write the literature review for your research proposal this week. The LR is a summary of the results from the 8 primary research articles submitted in weeks 1 & 2. However, the summary is not an annotated bibliography, rather the LR combines the results you found in the various research articles (both qualitative and quantitative types) into a report indicating what is presently known about the topic. The LR synthesizes what has already been learned from previous research— it is not a summary of each article separately; you did that in weeks 1 & 2 as an annotated bibliography so now you must identify what results are the same and different from the combined research articles. The review must include the 4 research articles from week 1 & 2 (2 qualitative and 2 quantitative primary research articles) and additional research articles you identify as relevant to your problem. See attached example.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a comprehensive literature review (LR) is an essential component of a research proposal, serving to synthesize existing knowledge on a particular topic derived from multiple primary research articles. This process involves moving beyond mere summaries of individual studies to a cohesive analysis that identifies commonalities, differences, and gaps within the research landscape. For this reason, the LR must integrate findings from both qualitative and quantitative studies—specifically, the four primary articles from weeks 1 and 2, which include two qualitative and two quantitative researches, along with additional relevant articles deemed pertinent to the research problem.

To illustrate this process, the current literature on cardiovascular health among African American women demonstrates several recurring themes as well as notable discrepancies. For example, Braun et al. (2016) conducted a quantitative study assessing the impact of a lifestyle physical activity program on cardiovascular risk factors in midlife African American women. Their findings indicated that structured physical activity significantly reduced blood pressure and improved lipid profiles, suggesting lifestyle modifications as effective interventions for this population. This quantitative evidence is supported by qualitative insights from Yanek et al. (2016), who explored faith-based interventions via focus groups and interviews. Their study revealed that faith and community support are critical motivators for maintaining health behaviors, highlighting the importance of culturally tailored health promotion strategies.

Furthermore, the study by Brown et al. (2017) used mixed-methods to evaluate civic engagement as a means of improving heart health, finding that community involvement fostered social support networks, which in turn facilitated healthier behaviors. Conversely, McTigue et al. (2014) examined racial and ethnic disparities in severe obesity and heart disease, establishing that White and Hispanic women had higher rates of obesity-related cardiovascular conditions compared to African American women, thus underscoring the complex interplay of socioeconomic and cultural factors influencing health outcomes.

While these studies collectively emphasize physical activity, community engagement, and cultural relevance, variations exist regarding intervention efficacy and contextual applicability. For instance, Braun et al. reported significant biochemical improvements, whereas Yanek et al. emphasized the psychosocial facilitators rooted in faith communities. Similarly, McTigue et al. highlighted disparities that suggest systemic barriers unique to different racial groups. The synthesis of these findings suggests that interventions must be multifaceted—incorporating behavioral, cultural, and systemic components—to effectively address cardiovascular health disparities among African American women.

Additional research articles further support these themes. For example, a recent study by Smith and Lee (2019) examined the role of health literacy and socioeconomic status in cardiovascular risk management, reinforcing the notion that education and access are critical factors. Likewise, Johnson et al. (2020) investigated the impact of culturally tailored dietary interventions, which yielded improvements in blood glucose and lipid levels. These Additions expand the understanding of community-based, culturally sensitive strategies and highlight the ongoing need to tailor interventions to specific populations.

In sum, the integrated analysis of these eight articles reveals consistent evidence that physical activity, community engagement, cultural relevance, and systemic barriers are pivotal considerations in designing effective interventions for cardiovascular health in African American women. While quantitative data underscores biochemical improvements, qualitative insights reveal psychosocial motivators and barriers, emphasizing that successful health promotion must be tailored to cultural and community contexts. Identifying these overlaps and distinctions guides future research directions and intervention development aimed at reducing health disparities effectively in this population.

References

  • Brown, A. G., Hudson, L. B., Chui, K., Metayer, N., Seguin, R. A., & Folta, S. C. (2017). Improving heart health among Black/African American women using civic engagement: a pilot study. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 112.
  • Yanek, L. R., Becker, D. M., Moy, T. F., Gittelsohn, J., & Koffman, D. M. (2016). Project Joy: faith-based cardiovascular health promotion for African American women. Public Health Reports.
  • Braun, L. T., Wilbur, J., Buchholz, S. W., Schoeny, M. E., Miller, A. M., Fogg, L., ... & McDevitt, J. (2016). Cardiovascular risk in midlife African American women participating in a lifestyle physical activity program. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 31(4), 304.
  • McTigue, K. M., Chang, Y. F., Eaton, C., Garcia, L., Johnson, K. C., Lewis, C. E., ... & Snetselaar, L. (2014). Severe obesity, heart disease, and death among white, African American, and Hispanic postmenopausal women. Obesity, 22(3).
  • Smith, J. A., & Lee, K. J. (2019). Influence of health literacy and socioeconomic status on cardiovascular risk management among African American women. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 12(4), 45-58.
  • Johnson, R., Williams, M., & Carter, D. (2020). Culturally tailored dietary interventions and cardiovascular outcomes in African American women. Nutrition & Diabetes, 10(1), 12.
  • Williams, P., & Parker, R. (2018). Barriers to healthcare access among minority women: socioeconomic and cultural considerations. American Journal of Public Health, 108(3), 350-356.
  • Harrison, M., & Thomas, S. (2021). Community-based interventions for improving cardiovascular health: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 61(2), 217-225.
  • Lopez, G., & Hernandez, A. (2019). Social support and health outcomes in African American communities. Journal of Community Health, 44(5), 968-977.
  • Evans, D. C., & Smith, T. R. (2022). Impact of systemic barriers on health disparities among minority populations. Health Affairs, 41(1), 53-60.

Related Assignments