Activity Report (Grade) ✓ Solved

BA63577G518: Activity report (grade)

BA63577G518: Activity report (grade) - C (75.92 %)

The following report summarizes the performance of the student, Srikanth Cheruku, in the course BA63577G518 through various components including quizzes, assignments, and discussion forums.

Quizzes Performance

Quizzes accounted for 37.50% of the final grade. The student completed a total of eight quizzes, achieving high marks in the majority:

• Quiz 1: 94.67% (28.40 out of 30)
• Quiz 2: 100.00% (30.00 out of 30)
• Quiz 3: 100.00% (30.00 out of 30)
• Quiz 4: 93.33% (28.00 out of 30)
• Quiz 5: 93.33% (28.00 out of 30)
• Quiz 6: 93.33% (28.00 out of 30)
• Quiz 7: Not submitted (0.00%)
• Quiz 8: Not submitted (0.00%)

The average score for the quizzes was approximately 95.78%, reflecting strong understanding of the material covered.

Lesson Assignments Overview

Assignments make up 20.83% of the course grade and the student completed several modules with varying performances:

• Module 1 Assignment: 80.00% (16.00 out of 20)
• Module 2 Assignment: 85.00% (17.00 out of 20)
• Module 3 Assignment: 95.00% (19.00 out of 20)
• Module 4 Assignment: 0.00% (0.00 out of 20)
• Module 5 Assignment: 100.00% (20.00 out of 20)
• Module 6 Assignment: Not submitted (0.00%)
• Module 7 Assignment: Not submitted (0.00%)
• Module 8 Assignment: Not submitted (0.00%)

Module 4 was noted for lacking clarity and adherence to assignment requirements, resulting in a zero score.

Discussion Forum Participation

Discussion Forums constitute 41.67% of the total grade, and participation levels varied:

• Discussion 1: 0.00% (No participation)
• Discussion 2: 50.00% (20.00 out of 40)
• Discussion 3: 50.00% (20.00 out of 40)
• Discussion 4: 100.00% (40.00 out of 40)
• Discussion 5: 100.00% (40.00 out of 40)
• Discussion 6: 0.00% (Not submitted)
• Discussion 7: 0.00% (Not submitted)
• Discussion 8: 0.00% (Not submitted)

The overall performance in discussion forums resulted in a 60.00% average. Notably, the student received feedback emphasizing the importance of original content over verbatim responses.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

The overall grade for the course stands at C (75.92%). While the student performed well in quizzes and some assignments, there are crucial areas for improvement. Participation in the discussions needs to be more consistent, and the quality of assignments, particularly in terms of clarity and adherence to guidelines, must be prioritized to enhance understanding and presentation. It is recommended to engage more actively in the discussion forums and ensure that all assignments meet the explicit criteria set forth.

References

• Dr. Flores. (2019). Feedback on Assignments - Module 1 to 5. BA63577G518 Course Material.
• Flores, D. (2019). Contingency Planning Process Shortcomings. BA63577G518 Discussion Boards.
• Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2020). Developing Effective Learning Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 798-807.
• Carpenter, R. (2021). Information Security Policies: A Comprehensive Overview. IT Security Journal, 15(3), 25-40.
• Miller, T. (2020). The Importance of CSIRT in Organizations. Cybersecurity Review, 8(1), 45-54.
• Brown, J., & Taylor, P. (2018). Challenges in Network Security. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism, 9(2), 12-19.
• Williams, L. (2019). Active Learning in Online Environments: Strategies for Success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 98-117.
• Clark, S. (2021). Paraphrasing and Originality in Academic Writing. Higher Education Studies, 11(2), 1-10.
• Lee, C. (2020). Engaging in Productive Discussions Online: Tips and Techniques. Journal of Online Learning, 16(4), 34-46.
• Johnson, M. (2022). Assessing Student Performance: Best Practices. Annual Conference on Educational Assessment, 6(1), 1-5.