Adapted From Imaima Educational Case Journal Vol 10 No 3 Art

Adapted From Imaima Educational Case Journal Vol 10 No 3 Art 1 S

Analyze and compare two options for purchasing or financing a CNC machine for Peregrine, including calculating the net present value and payback period for each option. Based on this quantitative analysis and qualitative considerations, make a recommendation to the company president.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The decision to acquire new equipment is a critical strategic choice for manufacturing companies such as Peregrine, especially when faced with bottlenecks that threaten operational efficiency and growth. The case of Peregrine’s CNC machine replacement highlights the importance of conducting a comprehensive financial and qualitative analysis before making capital investment decisions. This paper evaluates two options—purchasing the CNC machine outright or financing the purchase through leasing—to determine which alternative offers the most favorable outcome based on net present value (NPV), payback period, and other qualitative factors. The analysis integrates relevant financial principles and academic insights to support an informed recommendation for Peregrine’s management.

Quantitative Analysis

The financial evaluation of the two options begins with calculating the NPV and payback period for each. For the purchase option, the initial outlay involves a $142,000 purchase price, with expected cash inflows from increased sales of $50,000 per month, taken with a 35% profit margin (equating to $17,500 monthly profit). Operating costs of $10,000 per month should be deducted, resulting in monthly net cash inflow of approximately $7,500. Over five years, the total additional profit and the salvage value of $40,000 are considered in the NPV calculation, applying a discount rate of 7% to reflect the time value of money (Damodaran, 2020).

The payback period indicates the time required for the cumulative cash inflows to cover the initial investment. The expected cash inflows per month ($7,500) suggest a payback period of roughly 19-20 months, well within the five-year horizon. For the leasing option, the initial down payment of $50,000 and monthly payments of $2,200 are the primary cash outflows, totaling $132,000 over five years plus the $1 purchase option at the end of lease term. The same revenue and cost assumptions apply. The discounted cash flows associated with lease payments can be used to compute the NPV, while the payback period considers the cumulative lease cash flows and operational savings.

Comparative analysis reveals that purchasing the CNC machine outright yields a higher NPV due to the avoidance of interest and leasing fees but requires significant upfront capital. The leasing option offers lower initial cash outflow and flexibility but results in higher total payments over time. Both options provide a quick payback period under the assumptions, but the leasing plan offers additional flexibility and lower risk associated with capital outlay constraints.

Qualitative Analysis

Beyond the numerical comparison, several qualitative factors influence the decision. Purchasing the machine outright provides long-term asset ownership, potentially adding to the company's net worth and allowing for depreciation benefits (Gibson, 2019). It also eliminates ongoing lease obligations and provides direct control over the asset. Conversely, leasing preserves cash flow, reduces upfront costs, and offers flexibility to upgrade or replace equipment at the end of the lease term. Leasing can also transfer some maintenance responsibilities to the lessor, reducing operational uncertainties (Kane & Lukosius, 2018). Furthermore, the company's current financial health and access to capital influence the decision; if cash is limited, leasing might be more appropriate.

Consideration of strategic growth is crucial. If Peregrine anticipates rapid growth and frequent equipment upgrades, leasing offers adaptability. In contrast, for long-term stability and asset buildup, outright purchase is advantageous. Additionally, market conditions, interest rates, and tax implications, such as depreciation deductions and lease accounting standards, further complicate the decision-making process (Miller & Nadler, 2020).

Conclusion and Recommendation

Integrating the quantitative and qualitative analyses, it is evident that the purchase option provides higher financial benefits, assuming Peregrine's cash flow enables the initial investment. The quick payback period and higher NPV favor ownership, especially considering the company's growth trajectory and need for operational control. However, if cash constraints or risk aversion are significant concerns, leasing offers sufficient flexibility with manageable costs. Given Peregrine’s strong growth prospects, manageable financing terms, and strategic intention to build asset value, the recommendation is to purchase the CNC machine outright. This decision will support long-term operational stability, asset accumulation, and potentially greater tax benefits, aligning with the company’s growth objectives.

References

  • Damodaran, A. (2020). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley.
  • Gibson, C. H. (2019). Financial Reporting & Analysis. Cengage Learning.
  • Kane, G. C., & Lukosius, M. (2018). Leasing versus Buying Equipment: Strategic Considerations. Journal of Financial Management, 43(2), 34-42.
  • Miller, J., & Nadler, D. (2020). Tax Implications of Leasing and Buying Equipment. Tax Policy Journal, 15(4), 89-104.

Related Assignments