Ashford 6: Week 5 Final Paper Focus Of The F

Ashford 6: - Week 5 - Final Paper Final Paper Focus of The Final Paper

In Week One, you will choose a generic organization (manufacturing plant, hospital, etc.). Assume that you are a hired consultant for this organization. You have been asked by the president of the organization to prepare a background paper on the results of your research and to make recommendations to improve group productivity in the organization. Your research has identified the following problems: Role conflicts within groups, Communication problems among group members, Lack of cohesiveness in groups with diverse members, Excessive intergroup conflict.

In an eight to ten-page paper, include the following: Introduction - clear explanation of the type of organization; Explanation of how each problem could impact a group’s productivity (use examples to illustrate points); Recommendations to resolve each problem; Suggestions, based on your knowledge of group dynamics, for a company-wide training program on best practices for group productivity; Conclusion/Summary.

Paper For Above instruction

The impactful dynamics of group work within organizations significantly depend on how well various internal factors are managed. As a consultant for a manufacturing organization, I have conducted an extensive analysis of key challenges impairing effective group functioning. These challenges include role conflicts, communication issues, lack of cohesion, and intergroup conflicts. Addressing these issues comprehensively through strategic recommendations can foster a more productive, harmonious, and efficient working environment.

Firstly, understanding the nature of the organization is fundamental. A manufacturing plant typically involves collaborative effort across multiple departments such as production, quality control, logistics, and management. These departments must work together seamlessly to ensure productivity and quality. The organizational environment is often fast-paced, target-driven, and reliant on precise coordination among teams.

Role conflicts within groups are prevalent in such settings, where overlapping responsibilities or ambiguous job descriptions create confusion. For example, when a production team member is unclear whether their role includes equipment maintenance or solely assembly, it leads to inefficiencies. These conflicts can cause delays, reduce morale, and negatively impact overall productivity. Clear delineation of roles, along with well-defined job descriptions, can alleviate this issue by establishing expectations and reducing ambiguity.

Communication problems are another critical barrier. Poor information flow, lack of transparency, or inadequate feedback mechanisms hinder effective coordination. For instance, if the quality control team fails to relay defect reports promptly to production, rework costs escalate, and delays occur. Implementing structured communication channels, such as regular team meetings and digital collaboration platforms, ensures information is disseminated accurately and efficiently. Training employees in effective communication skills further enhances understanding and cooperation among team members.

Lack of cohesiveness, especially within diverse groups, affects teamwork and mutual support. Cultural differences, varied work styles, and differing goals can lead to misunderstandings and mistrust. For example, a team comprising members from different cultural backgrounds may interpret feedback differently, hindering collaboration. Facilitating team-building exercises, promoting cultural awareness, and developing shared goals foster mutual respect and a sense of unity, thereby strengthening cohesion.

Excessive intergroup conflict disrupts workflow and erodes trust across departments. Conflicts often arise from competition for resources, conflicting priorities, or misaligned incentives. For example, the production department might clash with logistics over delivery deadlines, impacting the entire supply chain. Resolution strategies include establishing conflict resolution protocols, encouraging open dialogue, and implementing cross-departmental collaboration initiatives. Leadership must also promote a culture that values cooperation over competition.

Based on these identified issues, specific recommendations can be devised. To address role conflicts, an organizational review should be undertaken to clarify responsibilities, followed by the development of comprehensive role descriptions accessible to all employees. For communication problems, integrating communication training and adopting digital tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams can streamline information sharing. Enhancing group cohesion requires structured team-building activities, cultural competency training, and shared vision statements. To reduce intergroup conflict, leadership should enforce conflict resolution procedures and incentivize interdepartmental collaboration through joint projects and shared performance metrics.

Furthermore, a company-wide training program focusing on best practices for group productivity is essential. This program would encompass modules on effective communication, conflict management, diversity and inclusion, and teamwork. Incorporating scenario-based exercises and ongoing coaching sessions reinforces learned behaviors. Building a culture that values continuous improvement and open communication elevates the overall performance of teams and departments.

In conclusion, addressing role conflicts, communication issues, lack of cohesion, and intergroup conflicts through targeted strategies can significantly improve group productivity within a manufacturing organization. Implementing clear roles, fostering effective communication, promoting inclusiveness and cohesion, and resolving conflicts constructively create an environment where teams work more effectively towards organizational goals. As a consultant, I recommend that leadership prioritize these interventions and invest in continuous training and organizational development initiatives to sustain long-term improvements.

References

• Gabarro, J. J. (1978). The ailing organization: Diagnosing the problems. Harvard Business Review, 56(3), 83-94.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Kinicki, A., & Williams, B. (2020). Management: A practical introduction (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. Jossey-Bass.
• Mullins, L. J. (2016). Management and organizational behavior (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.
• Wheelan, S. A. (2016). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. SAGE Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 616-628.