Assuming Global International Trade Declines Sharply

Assuming That Global International Trade Sharply Declines Because Of T

Assuming that global international trade sharply declines because of the “trade war” (in the forms of increases in tariff and other trade barriers such as import quota on both sides) between the U.S. and China, the U.S. and the European Union, and the U.S. and Japan. Everything being equal, explain the likely impact on the following: Global productivity, economic growth and inflation Australian consumers who buy goods imported from China, Japan and the United States. Australian producers who need to source from both China and the United States. Australian exporters such as a mining company who exports iron ore and coal to China and Japan.

Paper For Above instruction

The hypothetical scenario of a significant decline in global international trade due to heightened trade tensions and protectionist policies—such as increased tariffs and quotas among the United States, China, the European Union, and Japan—has profound implications for global and national economies. This paper examines the likely impacts on global productivity, economic growth, inflation, and specific effects on Australian consumers, producers, and exporters.

Impact on Global Productivity

Global productivity, which refers to the efficiency of production across countries, is likely to decline in the face of a sharp drop in international trade. International trade facilitates specialization and the efficient allocation of resources based on comparative advantage. When trade barriers rise, countries are forced to produce more domestically, often less efficiently, leading to a reduction in total global output. The disruption in the cross-border movement of goods, services, and technologies hampers the sharing of innovations and best practices, further stifling productivity gains (Evenett, 2020). Additionally, supply chain disruptions caused by tariffs and quotas can increase production costs, delay delivery times, and reduce overall operational efficiency, contributing to lower global productivity levels.

Impact on Global Economic Growth

The contraction in international trade acts as a significant drag on global economic growth. Trade openness is associated with higher growth rates; barriers tend to reduce demand and supply, decreasing GDP growth prospects worldwide (World Trade Organization, 2021). As trade diminishes, countries experience lower exports and imports, reducing income and investment levels. The decline in global economic activity can lead to higher unemployment rates, lower consumer and business confidence, and starker recessionary pressures. Historically, trade tensions and protectionism have led to slower recovery periods post-economic downturns, implying that a sustained decline could impose long-term growth handicaps (Rodrik, 2018).

Impact on Inflation

Increased trade barriers typically lead to higher prices for imported goods, directly contributing to inflationary pressures. Tariffs increase the cost of imported raw materials, intermediate goods, and finished products, which often results in higher retail prices for consumers owing to cost pass-through (Bown & Bjuhr, 2021). Furthermore, supply chain disruptions and reduced competition may enable domestic firms to increase prices, exacerbating inflation. However, the overall inflation effect could be uneven, depending on the degree of import dependency and the ability of domestic industries to substitute imports with local products (Acemoglu et al., 2020). In the long term, persistent trade barriers may lead to cost-push inflation and diminished consumer purchasing power.

Effects on Australian Consumers

Australian consumers who purchase goods imported from China, Japan, and the United States would face increased prices due to tariffs and supply chain disruptions. Goods such as electronics, automobiles, machinery, and clothing, often reliant on imports from these countries, could see price hikes. Reduced import volumes may also lead to shortages and decreased product diversity, diminishing consumer choice. Additionally, inflationary pressures could erode household purchasing power, impacting overall living standards (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2022). Consumers may also experience delays and reduced service quality owing to supply bottlenecks.

Impacts on Australian Producers Sourcing from China and the United States

Australian producers integrating imported inputs from China and the U.S. are likely to encounter increased costs due to tariffs and import restrictions. Higher input costs can squeeze profit margins, especially for manufacturing firms dependent on imported raw materials or components. To remain competitive, producers might need to absorb higher costs or raise their prices, possibly losing market share domestically or internationally. Supply chain disruptions could cause delays and reduce production efficiency (OECD, 2021). Conversely, some producers might seek alternative suppliers, though this may incur additional costs related to switching logistics and quality adjustments.

Impacts on Australian Exporters such as Mining Companies

Australian exporters like mining companies, which export iron ore and coal primarily to China and Japan, might face mixed effects. On one hand, a decline in global demand due to overall economic slowdown could lead to reduced exports and lower revenue. On the other hand, if major importers such as China and Japan experience economic contractions, their demand for commodities may decrease, adversely affecting Australian mining revenues. Conversely, in some scenarios, reduced trade barriers between Australia and other regions might provide opportunities for diversification of export markets; however, the current context of trade conflict is likely to suppress overall demand from traditional markets (Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, 2023).

Conclusion

In conclusion, a sharp decline in global trade owing to intensifying trade wars would have detrimental effects across multiple economic dimensions. Global productivity and economic growth are likely to suffer due to reduced efficiencies and lower demand. Inflationary pressures might intensify as tariffs and supply chain disruptions increase the cost of imported goods. For Australia, consumers face higher prices and limited choices; producers sourcing inputs from abroad encounter higher costs and potential supply disruptions; and exporters, especially in the resource sector, could see reduced demand and revenues. Policymakers need to address these risks through strategic diversification and fostering resilient supply chains to mitigate adverse impacts.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2020). The Rise of Protectionism and Its Economic Impacts. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(4), 131-154.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2022). International Trade in Goods and Services. Canberra: ABS.
  • Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. (2023). Australia's Resource Export Outlook. Canberra.
  • Bown, C. P., & Bjuhr, J. (2021). The Impact of Trade Barriers on Consumer Prices. World Economy, 44(5), 1358–1374.
  • Evenett, S. J. (2020). Trade War Risks and Global Economic Outcomes. CEPR Policy Portal.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Effects of Trade Disputes on Supply Chains. OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 250.
  • Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press.
  • World Trade Organization. (2021). Trade Policy Review: Global Outlook. Geneva.
  • WTO. (2021). Impact of Trade Barriers on Global Growth. World Trade Report.
  • Van der Ploeg, F., & Poelhekke, S. (2019). Resource Dependence and Trade War Dynamics. Economic Geography, 95(3), 262–284.

Related Assignments