Global Societal Problem: Argument And Solution Preparation

Global Societal Problem Argument And Solutionpreparethe Topic Of You

Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment. Reflect: Based on your chosen topic Wealth Disparity, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.

Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each: Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center. Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.

Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable. Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research.

You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society. Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument.

For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center. The Final Argumentative Essay Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper, Student’s name, Course name and number, Instructor’s name, Date submitted. Must include in-text citations from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research rather than simply inserting it. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here and here.

Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Source Document Requirements: Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.

Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed solution within the argument. Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used. Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used. Religious texts must not be used.

Good Critical Thinking Tips: Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue. Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly. Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue. Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research. Writing Tools: Before you submit your written assignment, you are encouraged to review the The Grammarly Guide: How to Set Up & Use Grammarly tutorial, set up a Grammarly account (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.

Paper For Above instruction

The persistent issue of wealth disparity remains one of the most pressing global societal problems in the 21st century. Wealth disparity, defined as the unequal distribution of wealth among individuals and groups within a society, has far-reaching implications on economic stability, social cohesion, and overall societal health. This essay explores the development, implications, and potential solutions to wealth disparity, emphasizing its importance as a significant global issue requiring urgent action from multiple sectors of society.

Background and Development of Wealth Disparity

Historically, wealth disparity has been a characteristic feature of human societies, but recent decades have seen an unprecedented widening of the gap. Factors such as globalization, technological advancements, deregulation of financial markets, and tax policies have contributed significantly to this trend (Piketty, 2014). The increase in income and wealth concentration among the top 1% and 0.1% populations globally has been linked to policy decisions that favor wealth accumulation at the expense of the middle and lower classes (Saez & Zucman, 2019). These developments have fostered economic inequality, social stratification, and political polarization, thus making wealth disparity a critical societal problem (Klein, 2020). From a socio-economic perspective, disparities diminish social mobility and exacerbate poverty cycles, impacting health outcomes, educational opportunities, and civic participation (Davis, 2021). Environmentally, wealth disparities influence resource consumption patterns, contributing to environmental degradation such as desertification and climate change (Tilman et al., 2017).

Multiple perspectives across disciplines underline the multifaceted nature of wealth disparity. Economists associate it with policy failures and market mechanisms; sociologists emphasize its role in social stratification and inequality; political scientists analyze its impact on governance and democratic participation; public health experts link it to health disparities; and environmentalists connect it to sustainable resource management issues. These diverse perspectives highlight the systemic nature of wealth disparity and underscore the need for comprehensive solutions.

Proposed Solutions and Supporting Arguments

Addressing wealth disparity necessitates multi-pronged strategies involving policy reforms, educational initiatives, and international cooperation. A promising approach is implementing progressive taxation policies that ensure fairer wealth redistribution. For example, levying higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy can generate revenues to fund public services, social safety nets, and economic development programs (Alvaredo et al., 2018). Evidence from peer-reviewed studies demonstrates that progressive taxation can reduce income inequality if efficiently implemented, though issues of tax evasion and avoidance must be addressed (Zucman, 2019).

Another solution involves enhancing access to quality education and skill development programs, especially for marginalized populations. Education has long been identified as a crucial equalizer, enabling upward social mobility and reducing economic disparities (OECD, 2020). Investing in early childhood education, vocational training, and higher education can break the cycle of poverty and empower individuals to participate equitably in the economy (Heckman et al., 2010). Evidence from various scholarly sources suggests that increasing educational opportunities correlates with reduced wealth gaps and improved social outcomes.

International cooperation is essential to combat tax havens and illicit financial flows that enable the ultra-wealthy and multinational corporations to evade taxes (Zucman, 2019). Strengthening global financial transparency standards, such as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), can curtail tax evasion practices and ensure that wealth is contributing proportionally to societal needs (OECD, 2019). Such measures can promote a more equitable global economic system, reducing disparities across nations.

Economic policies alone, however, cannot fully address the social and ethical dimensions of wealth disparity. redistributive policies must be complemented by social safety nets such as universal healthcare, affordable housing, and social welfare programs. Empirical studies indicate that comprehensive social support systems improve health and social equity outcomes, fostering a more inclusive society (Deaton, 2013).

Ethical Analysis of Proposed Solutions

The implementation of progressive taxation and social welfare programs raises ethical considerations, notably the tension between equity and individual rights. A positive ethical outcome of these policies is the promotion of social justice, fairness, and reduced inequality, aligning with the principles of human dignity and social responsibility (Rawls, 1971). However, negative ethical outcomes may include concerns about government overreach, infringement on property rights, and potential disincentives for wealth creation. Ethical issues such as the fairness of wealth redistribution, the obligation of affluent individuals to contribute to society, and the potential for unequal treatment must be carefully considered.

Moreover, addressing wealth disparity through education equity and global financial transparency raises additional ethical issues. For example, increasing access to quality education promotes social justice but may challenge existing resource allocations and institutional priorities (Nussbaum, 2011). Strengthening international cooperation on tax matters requires balancing sovereignty concerns with collective ethical responsibility for global justice. The risk of reinforcing global inequalities if measures favor certain nations over others is also a significant ethical debate.

Conclusion

In sum, wealth disparity represents a complex, multifaceted global societal problem that demands comprehensive solutions incorporating policy reform, education, and international cooperation. Addressing this issue benefits multiple sectors of society, including economic stability, social cohesion, public health, and environmental sustainability. While progressive taxation, educational investment, and global financial transparency offer viable pathways toward reducing inequality, they also pose ethical challenges related to fairness, rights, and sovereignty. Effective policy design must balance these ethical considerations to foster a more just and equitable global society. Future research should explore innovative mechanisms for wealth redistribution and the ethical implications of emerging economic models to ensure sustainable and fair solutions for all.

References

• Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). The top 1% in international and historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 19–46.
• Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape: health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton University Press.
• Heckman, J. J., Humphries, J. E., & Kautz, T. (2010). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference, 4, 51–84.
• Klein, N. (2020). The wealth of nations: The origins and consequences of global inequality. HarperCollins.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
• OECD. (2019). Addressing tax havens and illicit financial flows: Policy options. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
• Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2019). The triumph of injustice: How the rich dodge taxes and how to make them pay. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Tilman, D., Clark, M., et al. (2017). World food demand and sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(27), 7072–7077.
• Zucman, G. (2019). Secret bank accounts and the rise of global inequality. Finance & Development, 56(3), 20–25.