Class Profile Student Name English Language Learner Gender ✓ Solved

Class Profile Student Name English Language Learner Gender

Create a class profile based on the provided data for the students. Each entry should include the student’s name, their status as an English language learner, gender, age, oral language development, reading Lexile/ grade performance level, written expression level, and social/pragmatic/communication skills. Include strategies, activities, and rationale for supporting their development, particularly focusing on their reading and writing skills.

Paper For Above Instructions

Class Profile Overview

This document presents a detailed class profile summarizing the diverse learning needs of students in a classroom setting. By analyzing the data for each student, we can identify their strengths and areas requiring support, particularly in reading and writing development. The profile covers students' status as English language learners, their various performance levels, and specific communication skills. This comprehensive overview can aid educators in tailoring instruction to meet each student's unique needs.

Student Profiles

Arturo: An English language learner, Arturo is a male student currently performing below grade level in reading. He uses phonics and morphology to decode words but struggles with written expression, only managing to write simple sentences. His social skills are deemed good, although he may require additional support in conflict resolution.

Bertie: A female student and not an English language learner, Bertie excels above grade level in reading and writing, demonstrating aptitude in crafting simple sentences. Her communication skills are strong, but she needs assistance with conflict resolution.

Beryl: Another female student, Beryl is not labeled as an English language learner. She is performing above grade level academically. However, the school does not have a gifted program which limits her potential for further academic challenges. Her written expression is proficient, and she shows good communication skills.

Brandie: A female student receiving Tier 2 RTI support for math, Brandie's reading skills are below grade level. She has difficulty with written expression, only being able to write her name and sight words. Additional attention to verbal and nonverbal communication is advisable.

Dessie: This female student is not an English learner and is performing at grade level. She demonstrates good social communication skills, indicating an ability to engage effectively with peers.

Diana: Diana is an English language learner facing challenges in reading performance levels, where she is also categorized as below grade level. Written expression is consistently below grade level, indicating the need for targeted literacy interventions.

Donnie: A female student who needs assistance with hearing aids and is currently at grade level. She faces challenges in reading but performs at grade level in written expression and shows good communication skills.

Eduardo: Eduardo, a male English language learner, is at grade level for reading but performs below in written expression, primarily creating simple sentences. His overall communication skills are good, indicating a need for further development in writing.

Emma: An English learner with robust reading and written expression skills, Emma performs above grade level and actively engages in her learning experience.

Enrique: Despite being one year above grade level in reading, Enrique faces challenges with decoding, primarily reading sight words only. His written expression is also below grade level.

Fatma: Fatma is a female English language learner who is currently at grade level but below in written expression where she can only write her name and sight words.

Frances: Frances is performing at grade level and demonstrates good written expression at the same level. Her communication skills are also commendable.

Francesca: Not an English language learner but performing above grade level, Francesca writes competently while needing support to maintain dialogue on topic.

Fredrick: As a Tier 3 RTI student, Fredrick performs at one year above grade level. He faces challenges in comprehending written tasks, requiring additional verbal and nonverbal support.

Ines: A female Tier 2 RTI support student in math, Ines performs well above grade level academically but requires assistance in social communication.

Jade: Jade is performing at grade level across both reading and writing with commendable communication skills.

Kent: Performing above grade level, Kent showcases strong social skills and copes well with oral language development.

Lolita: Despite being below grade level, Lolita excels in social and communication skills, indicating her ability to engage with peers effectively.

Maria: Male student facing similar challenges presents himself above grade level yet requires social communication assistance.

Mason: Mason performs at grade level across all subjects, demonstrating sound written expression and communication skills.

Nick: Nick is an English learner and needs support with conversational turn-taking, even as he performs above grade level in reading.

Noah: This student performs consistently at grade level, indicating a healthy balance in oral language development and written expression.

Sharlene: Below grade level in reading, Sharlene struggles with written expression requiring immediate evaluation for effective pedagogical strategies.

Sophia: A proficient writer, Sophia performs above grade level and is capable in her written expression and overall social interactions.

Stuart: Stuart's performance is strikingly at grade level across all assessments, though he may requires accommodation due to allergies affecting focus.

Terrence: Terrence shows respectable performance at grade level while needing additional support for resolving conflicts.

Wade: Performing below grade level, Wade’s strengths lie in his social interactions, and he needs targeted writing instruction.

Wayne: As a Tier 3 RTI student in math, Wayne shows potential to improve but is currently performing below grade level.

Wendell: Wendell is on grade level and requires differentiated instruction in writing.

Yung: A male student performing below grade level, his remarkable aptitude and above-grade-level performance in reading shows promise for future growth.

Strategies for Improvement

• Strategy 1: Implementing targeted reading interventions tailored for individual student needs will enhance decoding and fluency skills.
• Strategy 2: Utilizing phonics-focused workshops to strengthen foundational reading skills.
• Strategy 3: Encouraging collaborative written activities to improve written expression and promote peer feedback.
• Strategy 4: Providing social skills training and conflict resolution workshops to enhance interpersonal communication.
• Strategy 5: Regularly monitoring progress through formative assessments to adjust instructional strategies as needed.

Activities to Engage Students

• Activity 1: Group reading sessions where students partner to read and discuss selected texts.
• Activity 2: Writing workshops focusing on sentence expansion and creative storytelling.
• Activity 3: Role-playing scenarios to foster social skills and boost confidence in verbal interactions.

Rationale

These strategies and activities are essential in addressing the diverse learning requirements of students. By focusing specifically on reading and writing competencies, educators can foster a supportive environment conducive to growth. Engaging students through collaborative learning and targeted interventions can significantly uplift their academic performance and social skills, ultimately aiming for holistic development.

References

• August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners. A Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). The Condition of Education 2021. U.S. Department of Education.
• Gerber, M., & Scully, P. (2009). Learning by Listening: Effective Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher.
• Francis, D. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2006). Language and Reading Success: Evidence-Based Practices for Teaching Students with Reading Difficulties. Routledge.
• Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic Language and the Challenge of Reading for Understanding. Harvard Education Press.
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4).
• Graves, M. F. (2006). The Vocabulary Book: Learning and Instruction. Teachers College Press.
• Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Response to Intervention as a Means of Providing Secondary Students with Effective, Research-Based Interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
• Hollis, S., & McCabe, A. (2011). The Importance of Play: A Teacher’s Guide to Understanding Play for Language and Literacy Development. Childhood Education.
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better Learning Through Structured Teaching: A Framework for the Gradual Release of Responsibility. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).