Core Assessment Rubric: Criteria, Excellent Points, Problem

Core Assessment Rubriccriteriaexcellentpointsproblem Statementmax 1500

Core Assessment Rubric Criteria Excellent Points Problem Statement Max 1500 Words-an overview of the topic your research will investigate. It introduces and justifies your research question, key variables, their hypothesized relations, and your guiding theoretical perspective. It explains how your planned research is unambiguous in its goals and methods, concerned with a significant issue that will add to the store of human knowledge, theoretically justifiable and testable, practical and feasible to implement, ethical and respectful of human rights, and builds on existing knowledge in the field. 25

Literature Review Max 1500 words-critical summary of existing research your project will build upon. Your review will evaluate at least five other relevant research projects from original sources in reputable, peer-reviewed journals. The lit review discusses previous research, as it influences the proposed project. It evaluates the methodological, theoretical, or substantive strengths or weaknesses of those studies and explains how they shape your research plans. 25

Design and Procedures Max 2000 words- describes and justifies your plans for measurement, sampling, design, analysis, and interpretation of results. It explains which data you would collect, when you would collect it, and what you would do with it to make sense of your topic and shed new light on your research question — and how and why. This section is a set of “how to” instructions for actually turning your “good idea” into a real plan for scientifically answering your original question. Your research proposal is a carefully constructed argument for why your question should be answered and how a valid and reliable answer might be obtained. It should be a meticulous set of instructions for generating an answer according to the rules of scientific method, and it should make the case to interested parties for how such an answer can be achieved. 25

Ethics and Conduct of Research Max - 1500 words-summarizes potential ethical dilemmas, political consequences, and practical challenges associated with designing, conducting, implementing, and disseminating your research. It explains where your research process might go wrong and the safeguards you will put into place to minimize those risks. 25

Format (APA) Follows APA formatting 10 Total Points 100

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of academic research, the foundation of any substantial inquiry begins with a well-defined problem statement. This initial step is crucial as it delineates the scope and objectives of the entire research project. The problem statement must clearly articulate the research question, highlight the key variables involved, and specify the hypothesized relationships among these variables. It should also position the research within a guiding theoretical framework, ensuring that the study is theoretically justifiable and empirically testable.

Developing an effective problem statement involves establishing the significance of the research. It must address an issue that contributes meaningfully to existing knowledge and has practical implications. For instance, in social sciences, this could involve examining a pressing social problem such as mental health stigma or educational inequality. The statement should clarify why the research is necessary, highlighting gaps in current understanding that the study aims to fill. It is also essential to propose how the research methodology will be aligned with the goals, ensuring clarity and precision in the approach.

Building upon the problem statement, the literature review synthesizes existing research, critically evaluating previous studies related to the topic. The review should encompass at least five peer-reviewed articles, assessing their methodological robustness, theoretical contributions, and substantive findings. By doing so, the review identifies gaps, controversies, or limitations in the literature that justify the new investigation. Methodological strengths, such as rigorous data collection procedures or innovative analytical techniques, should be highlighted, as should weaknesses like small sample sizes or narrow theoretical scopes.

The literature review not only summarizes prior research but contextualizes it within the current study’s framework. This process involves discussing how previous findings influence the research questions and why the proposed approach can address unresolved issues. A thorough review guides the selection of measurement tools, sampling strategies, and analytical methods, ensuring that the new research contributes substantively to scholarly discourse.

The research design and procedures section provides a detailed roadmap for conducting the study. This includes specifying the data collection methods, such as surveys, interviews, or experiments, and justifying their suitability for capturing the variables of interest. Sampling strategies—whether random, stratified, or convenience sampling—must be rationalized based on the research context. Additionally, the design should outline the analytical techniques planned, such as statistical tests or qualitative coding procedures, and explain how these will help interpret the results.

In crafting this section, it is vital to ensure that the procedures are systematic, replicable, and aligned with scientific standards. This involves describing the timing of data collection, ethical considerations, and plans to manage data integrity and validity. The ultimate goal is to translate the initial conceptual idea into a comprehensive, step-by-step plan that can yield reliable and meaningful answers to the research question.

Addressing ethics and conduct of research entails honest acknowledgment of potential dilemmas and challenges. Ethical considerations encompass participants' rights, confidentiality, informed consent, and the minimization of harm. Political and practical challenges—such as access to data, resource limitations, or biases—must also be considered. To mitigate these risks, researchers should implement safeguards, including ethical review board approvals, anonymization procedures, transparent reporting, and adherence to institutional guidelines.

Overall, a robust research proposal integrates these components into a cohesive plan. It demonstrates the capacity to contribute new insights into the chosen topic while respecting ethical standards and methodological rigor. Proper formatting according to APA guidelines ensures clarity, professionalism, and scholarly integrity. When meticulously developed, such a proposal provides a solid foundation for successfully addressing complex research questions and advancing knowledge.

References

• Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, C. C., & Author, D. D. (Year). Title of the book. Publisher.
• Author, E. E. (Year). Title of the research report. Institution or Journal. URL
• Author, F. F. (Year). Another relevant study. Peer-reviewed Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, G. G. (Year). Theoretical framework in social research. Journal of Social Sciences, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, H. H. (Year). Methodologies in behavioral science. Research Methods Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, I. I. (Year). Ethical considerations in human research. Ethics Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, J. J. (Year). Data analysis techniques for social sciences. Statistics & Data Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, K. K. (Year). Challenges in research implementation. Research Practice Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, L. L. (Year). Advances in qualitative research methods. Qualitative Methods Review, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx