Wal Nur S6241 06 A En Ccmp4612017 Rubric Detail Blackboard L

Wal Nurs6241 06 A En Ccmp4612017 Rubricdetailblackboardlearnht

The assignment involves creating a comprehensive discussion post and responses based on specified criteria related to scholarly writing, course participation, and professional communication. Students are expected to produce a well-supported, concise, and properly formatted academic discussion, respond to colleagues thoughtfully, and adhere to deadlines and APA formatting standards.

Paper For Above instruction

Scholarly communication plays a vital role in advancing nursing knowledge and fostering professional development. The core of this assignment requires students to craft a substantive primary post that addresses all relevant discussion criteria with significant depth and breadth, supported by credible references. The post must demonstrate a clear understanding of the discussion topic, employ proper APA formatting, and be free of spelling and grammatical errors. The use of at least two current credible references is essential to substantiate key points, enhancing the credibility and academic rigor of the discussion.

In addition to the primary post, students are tasked with engaging actively in the discussion by responding to at least two colleagues' posts. These responses should be reflective, justified with credible sources, and include questions that extend the dialogue. Responding in a respectful and professional manner fosters an environment conducive to learning and shared inquiry. Responses should be well-articulated, concise, and adhere to standards of Standard Edited English, with proper APA citation when referencing sources.

Timeliness is a key aspect of participation; initial posts should be submitted on time, and responses to colleagues should be made over at least three different days to promote ongoing discussion. Failure to meet these requirements results in point deductions, which directly impact the overall grade.

Overall, successful completion of this assignment hinges on demonstrating professional communication, critical thinking, and adherence to academic standards in writing and participation. This entails not only articulating well-supported opinions but also engaging respectfully and meaningfully with peers, thereby enriching the collective learning experience.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Cottrell, R. R. (2019). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Routledge.
• Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Walker, J. (2018). Effective academic writing strategies for health sciences. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 8(4), 45-53.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.
• Lee, A., & Edwards, M. (2019). Professional communication in health care settings. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 95, 120-124.
• Gillis, M. (2020). Building effective scholarly discussions in graduate nursing programs. Nursing Education Perspectives, 41(2), 89-91.