Emerging Writer Worksheetreview The Videos As You Progress Through Thi
Review the videos as you progress through this document for a more detailed explanation of the assignment’s objective and expectations. Important note: The theme REFLECTION cannot be used for the final submission of the assignment. It is used in the video for demonstration purposes only. Thematic Matrix In this section use a thematic matrix to extract key themes from the articles in order to synthesize common themes. VIDEO: Section 1 Patterns and Themes (12:47): Coffman, Putman, Adkisson, Kriner, and Monaghan (2016) Garcia and Yao (2019) Inouye and McAlpine (2017) Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Insert a theme from the article listed above Looking over the thematic matrix above, what are two major patterns that are apparent in all three readings?
In other words, where do these patterns overlap? These two themes that are common to all 3 articles will be your synthesized themes for the paper. Please list them below. Theme 1: Theme 2:
Enter these in the worksheet below Finding Evidence to Support Themes VIDEO: Section 2 Evidence Worksheet, Topic Sentences, and Thesis Statement (12:18): Theme One: Title of Theme Here Coffman, Putman, Adkisson, Kriner, and Monaghan (2016) Garcia and Yao (2019) Inouye and McAlpine (2017) Synthesize How does this theme relate to the topic of the paper (role of the researcher)? This will become your topic sentence in the paper. Theme Two: Title of Theme Here Coffman, Putman, Adkisson, Kriner, and Monaghan (2016) Garcia and Yao (2019) Inouye and McAlpine (2017) Synthesize How does this theme relate to the topic of the paper (role of the researcher)? This will become your topic sentence in the paper. Forming a Thesis Statement List your two synthesized topic sentences to create your thesis statement. Topic sentence 1: Topic sentence 2: From these extrapolate a thesis claim about the role of the researcher. Organizing the Argument VIDEO: Section 3: Outline (13:11): I. Introduction a. Engaging statement b. Contextualize topic c. Contextualize themes d. Thesis statement II. Theme 1 a. Topic sentence b. Evidence from 3 articles c. Transition statement to next theme III. Theme 2 a. Topic sentence b. Evidence from 3 articles IV. Conclusion a. Support thesis statement b. Summarize theme points c. Future research recommendations Reflecting on the Process VIDEO: Reflecting on the Process (2:54): Transcript of Video In the following word reflection, please reflect on the process of synthesizing an argument from research articles. Please discuss the challenges that you encountered identifying patterns from the research articles and the development of themes that will be the foundation of your upcoming Module 5 paper. What did you learn about how to organize an argument? What did you learn about the process of synthesis? What has surprised you? What new perspectives have you acquired you will carry forward? References Coffman, K., Putman, P., Adkisson, A., Kriner, B., & Monaghan, C. (2016). Waiting for the expert to arrive: Using a community of practice to develop the scholarly identity of doctoral students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 28 (1), 30-37. Retrieved from Garcia, C. E., Yao, C. W. (2019). The role of an online first-year seminar in higher education doctoral students’ scholarly development. The Internet and Higher Education , 42 , 44-52. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.002 Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14 (2), 3-19. Retrieved from Appendix A: Transcripts of Videos Emerging Writer Worksheet: Reflecting on the Process Well there you have it. The emerging writer worksheet and you successfully completed filling out all of this information towards execution of our synthesis paper. The last thing we want to do is now reflect on our process. You have put in a lot of hard work. You have learned new things. You have uncovered new frameworks, new ways of learning, and new ways of thinking about information. Reflective practice offers us an opportunity to think about the processes we've actively engaged through the first 2 weeks of class and within this exercise. We have been reviewing research, highlighting keywords, terms, or word clusters that we may not have been familiar with previously. We have been categorizing information by means of thematic analysis and then organizing those efforts into a formal writing construct. So as you look back through your experiences over the previous two weeks (and perhaps even through the third week): what has this writing experience looked like and felt like for you as an emerging writer? Has your connection to the work - has your understanding of what our work entails, what becoming a researcher means collecting and analyzing data, developing your objective eye and your objective voice - discussing research outcomes - have those connections and the responsibility they carry become more real for you? Reflective practice is something we can continue to engage and revisit. Each of the processes here on the worksheet (the language, the concepts we are learning here); each are going to come up again. (Each) will provide us a first step in developing our familiarity with processes associated with reviewing literature, organizing information, and objectively discussing research-based outcomes. Take time here to look back. You want to discuss the challenges you have encountered: what did you learn what will you take forward with you? What might you have to change? And with that, we conclude our discussion of the emerging writer worksheet. 1. For this assignment, review the article: Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security, 4 , 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm.414 Address the following: · What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so? · Identify the hypothesis or question being tested · Summarize the overall article. · Identify the conclusions of the authors · Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis · Consider alternative explanations for the results · Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions) · The relevance or importance of the study · The appropriateness of the experimental design When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process. Your paper should meet the following requirements: · Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page. · Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion. · Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources. · Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing. Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a new idea from existing ideas. This assignment is designed to help you identify how themes can emerge from reading literature and how you can synthesize this information in a way that creates new knowledge. This assignment is designed to help you identify how themes can emerge from reading literature and how you can synthesize this information in a way that creates new knowledge. You will use your understandings of the course readings encountered to date to complete the emerging writer worksheet.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment involves synthesizing research literature by identifying common themes across selected articles, supporting these themes with evidence, and organizing a coherent argument through an outline. It starts with a thematic matrix to extract key themes from multiple articles, followed by selecting two overarching, synthesized themes shared by all the readings. These themes are then supported by evidence from each source, which will form the basis of topic sentences in the paper. The paper requires a clear thesis statement derived from these themes, an organized outline including introduction, body, and conclusion, and careful reflection on the process of synthesizing research arguments. Additionally, students must evaluate an article on cybersecurity and the Internet of Things, providing an objective critique focusing on the research question, methodology, conclusions, and implications. The overall goal is to develop skills in literature review, thematic analysis, synthesis, and scholarly writing, culminating in a well-organized, concise paper supported by relevant scholarly sources.
