General Instructions For List Assignments And Discussions

General Instructions For List AssignmentsSome Discussions Assignments

Some discussions assignments are marked as “LIST” assignments. The instructions for LIST assignments are much simpler than for other discussions. The purpose of a LIST assignment is to come up with some sort of list as a class. Think of it as the online equivalent of a brainstorming session in an in-person class where you are making a big list of something on a whiteboard. For this type of discussion, you only need one post, and it must add something new to the list.

So you have to look through the posts of all other students and find something that no one else has posted. Note that the longer you wait to complete a LIST assignment, the harder it gets to find something new to add to the list.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of a LIST assignment in an academic setting is to facilitate collaborative brainstorming by encouraging students to contribute unique ideas that enrich the collective list. This method mimics the in-class exercise of jotting down ideas on a whiteboard, fostering an interactive learning environment. The core requirement is to submit a single post that introduces a new item or perspective not previously mentioned by peers. Timing plays a critical role; the sooner a student posts, the greater the chance of contributing a distinct item, as later posts require identifying novel entries in an increasingly saturated list.

Implementing an effective strategy for such assignments involves several steps. First, students should thoroughly review existing posts before drafting their own to avoid duplication. Second, contributions should be thoughtful, adding meaningful new dimensions to the list rather than superficial or redundant ideas. Third, timely participation is essential; waiting until the last minute diminishes the opportunity to offer something truly original, thus reducing the overall collaborative value of the activity.

Educationally, LIST assignments promote critical thinking, prompt engagement, and peer learning. They encourage students to pay close attention to peers’ contributions and to build upon existing ideas, fostering a dynamic and inclusive classroom atmosphere even in online settings. The format also supports the development of concise communication skills, as students must craft brief yet impactful posts that introduce genuinely new points.

In summary, the key aspects of successful participation in LIST assignments include understanding the purpose of collaborative idea generation, reviewing prior contributions comprehensively, contributing original content promptly, and ensuring that each post adds value. These practices not only enhance individual learning but also enrich the collective educational experience, illustrating the importance of timely and thoughtful engagement in online discussions.

References

• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 85-118.
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9.
• Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2019). Teachers' professional learning and the role of collaborative dialogue. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 92-107.
• Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
• Anderson, T. (2017). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view. Cengage Learning.
• Barab, S. A., & Dede, C. (2007). Games and immersive learning: Contemporary possibilities. Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 46-54.
• Salmon, G. (2013). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Routledge.
• Shank, J. D. (2010). Engaging online learners: Strategies for interaction and motivation. Jossey-Bass.