Guidelines For Writing The Reading Reviews ✓ Solved
Guidelines For Writing The Reading Reviewssyg 2010reading Reviews Are
Guidelines for writing the Reading Reviews SYG 2010 Reading Reviews are to be handed in on the day that the material is being discussed. They should be no longer than 4-6 pages double spaced. Over the course of the semester, you only have to write one of your choice. Definition of the Assignment: This assignment is designed for you to interact with sources outside of the typical classroom literature. Part of the purpose of this assignment is to help expose you to other ways of thinking about social problems as well as help you make connections between your sociological interests and the sociological study of social problems that we do inside the classroom.
In addition, this assignment should help to hone media literacy skills. The response should identify and connect the reading/viewings to the substantive area of the discussion, and provide a critical evaluation of the material and the topic under discussion. To sharpen your critical thinking skills, spot inconsistencies, contradictions, paradoxes or surprising statements in the non-academic material as compared to the Reading and elaborate on them. Specifically, the paper should discuss how the non-academic material informs our understanding of the substantive area we are discussing (whether correctly as our reading outline) or incorrectly. This paper should explore how the specific topic is framed and discussed, how the form of the material functions in conveying the message, and the importance of the analytical message each reading/viewing has.
Starting thoughts to consider: How does the suggested material illuminate the social problem; what questions emerge from your reading; short comparisons between concepts discussed in previous sessions and the concepts discussed in your response paper; connections to that week’s assigned readings as well as the broader understanding of the social problem. What should you include: The response should identify and connect the readings/viewings to the substantive area of the discussion, and provide a critical evaluation of the material and the social problem under discussion. Specifically, the paper should give a brief summary of the material and discuss how it informs our understanding of the social problem (whether correctly as our readings outline or incorrectly).
This paper should explore how the social problem is framed and discussed, how the form of the material functions in conveying the message, and the importance of the analytical message each reading/viewing has. Finally, each response should include 2 discussion questions (not included in page length). Important points about this assignment: You should use the response paper to raise points for discussion in class/help your understanding of the substantive area. In this course, you are expected to make an effort to understand social problems as both products of structural failings and social conditions but also as present "instruments" that can serve our thinking and research purposes. You should acquire knowledge about the place of concepts within bodies of literature and the potential contemporary uses of social problems.
Thus, in your response papers, I would expect to see a mix of insightful analysis and critique of particular readings, ideas, and authors and interpretive appraisals. An interpretive appraisal is an effort to understand the ideas, and authors "on their own terms." In addition, you will be unable to receive full credit for the assignment if you do not discuss the reading in class. You will be considered the expert on this “reading” as you will be reading it a lot more closely than your classmates. You will be expected to help educate the class on the finer points and take a lead during the discussion portion of the class period. Failure to do so will impact the final grade for this assignment.
Grading: You can earn up to 100 points for this paper. You will be graded on content, style, and formatting. I will not be looking to see if you agree or disagree with me or the readings, but how well you argue the readings’ points. In addition, a small portion of the grade will be based on the quality of your discussion during class. This review is expected to be in essay format, which includes the conventions listed in the syllabus. The style of your writing/essay is also taken into consideration. Please use correct grammar as improper grammar detracts from your writing and will hurt your grade. Please proofread your paper before turning it in to double check for errors or mistakes as well as readability. The flow of your writing is always unique as it identifies you as a writer, but choppy and awkward sentences (while sometimes useful in literature) have no place here and detract from the paper overall.
Sample Paper For Above instruction
[Sample answer based on the assignment prompt would be provided here, including a thoughtful summary and critical analysis of a selected reading/viewing material related to a social problem, along with two discussion questions.]
References
- Author A., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author B., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author C., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author D., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author E., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author F., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author G., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author H., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author I., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.
- Author J., Year. Title of the Source. Journal/Publisher.